Originally posted by ChristFirst
Your philosophy sounds good, but that's all it is. Does your reasoning have anything to do with the fact that these offenses were deemed punishable by God first...no matter how they are defined. God said that they are sins...now they are the foundation of the laws of man! They make sense because man had nothing to do with them.You limit incest to just the act of impermissible sexual relations between and adult and child, when in fact, it is an act of immoral sexual behavior between any/all family members, whether young or old. Sexual interaction between adults and youth is molestation, pedophilia and incest altogether. Homosexuality has nothing to do with consent...it's still immoral.
Nevertheless, these things extend beyond what you think you know...they are all spiritual...since you had nothing to do with setting these human and supernatural laws in motion and how they intertwine...your philosophy means nothing.
There is no way you are ever going to have a good conversation about this with someone who doesn't accept religious beliefs about God and Sin. It just never works out well. You can have the best arguments out there...but in the end, no one is going to change their point of view.