Originally posted by Smasandian
Well, I know the XBOX is not profitable.But at the end of September of 2005, the XBOX sold 20 million consoles. This is from the official manufacter.
Well, it hasnt done great like the PS2, but it hardly is called an flop.What you think about the games doesnt really matter. It's what people buy. If you think the XBOX has crappy sequels and crappy old games, thats fine by me, I somewhat agree with you. But does that reflect on why it flopped. No.
Just checking Game Ranking.com to see whats the top 10 games were of all 3 consoles and how many were not sequels.
XBOX has 4 with Halo, Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia (pretty much completly different than the original), and KOTAR
PS2 has 1 with God Of War. ( I could also include GTA3, but that can go both ways
GC has 2 with Vietiful Joe and Prince of Persia.
I know that it just 10 games, but these are the best games out there (according to averages of critics)
Overall, maybe others beat the XBOX, but its impossible to find that out.But to say XBOX has just sequels is wrong. Every console has thier strengths.
PS2 has the biggest amount of games, but alot of them suck, and they're a few big games but less killer apps.
XBOX is the port king,
GC has the most killer apps, but less software support. The're probaby the biggest abusers of sequels and rehashes. How many Mario Karts, mario sport games are theyr?
Zelda's and Metriods are amazing buth they're pretty much the same game since the 80's.I dont think XBOX flopped completly, it couldnt contend with Sony.
So basically, you didn't prove much with that did you?
"It sold 20 million copies." Yeah, resulting in Microsoft losing out big time because they had to drop their ridiculous prices about ten times due to nobody buying the thing. That, plus all the money they laid out on pathetically expensive advertising and merch, it was a knock to them. So yeah, they sold a shitload after they succumbed to about ten reductions and were selling them for dirt cheap and with four games (like they were doing here).
PS2 didn't have a strength then did it? You make no sense. It had loads of games...ok. "But a lot of them sucked." So what's the point?
Xbox is a failed PC, simple as. It has PC style graphics with nowhere near the quality of visual or more importantly, gameplay. It was the "port king" only because it had more ports. It didn't do any of them particularly well.
Nintendo make a bulk of their own games. Sony and Xbox have franchises and they just keep them going throughout the consoles. Nintendo have that too, sure they do, but they also bring out brand new games. Xbox and Sony have to rely on multi-platform games. The games that Nintendo DON'T create, they take and make better. EG: Resident Evil. It got to a point where Xbox, Dreamcast and PS2 could do nothing more and Nintendo just come along and said "Hang about."
Also, how on Earth you can claim that Prince of Persia was totally different and Metroid Prime wasn't, I'll never know. They were essentially both side scrolling games. Cube took Metroid into first and third person with many new kinds of gameplay and RELEVANT features. Prince of Persia took the easy way out. Make it 3D, steal from some other games and add some gymnastics. When you're plagiarising from Devil May Cry, you're scraping the barrel.
So yes, in closing, the Xbox was a failure when compared to what was promised, and Microsoft- for the superficial sake of having high sales- took price losses to make sure it happened. It didn't matter whether people liked it, they wanted to shift units.
-AC