Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
How is it NOT? It took Xbox Live, some many years later, to even salvage some fans. Even then it was with a majority of old games or rehashed sequels.I can't think of one good game that was exclusive to it. Halo maybe, but that was overrated.
-AC
Well, I know the XBOX is not profitable.
But at the end of September of 2005, the XBOX sold 20 million consoles. This is from the official manufacter.
Well, it hasnt done great like the PS2, but it hardly is called an flop.
What you think about the games doesnt really matter. It's what people buy. If you think the XBOX has crappy sequels and crappy old games, thats fine by me, I somewhat agree with you. But does that reflect on why it flopped. No.
Just checking Game Ranking.com to see whats the top 10 games were of all 3 consoles and how many were not sequels.
XBOX has 4 with Halo, Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia (pretty much completly different than the original), and KOTAR
PS2 has 1 with God Of War. ( I could also include GTA3, but that can go both ways
GC has 2 with Vietiful Joe and Prince of Persia.
I know that it just 10 games, but these are the best games out there (according to averages of critics)
Overall, maybe others beat the XBOX, but its impossible to find that out.
But to say XBOX has just sequels is wrong. Every console has thier strengths.
PS2 has the biggest amount of games, but alot of them suck, and they're a few big games but less killer apps.
XBOX is the port king,
GC has the most killer apps, but less software support. The're probaby the biggest abusers of sequels and rehashes. How many Mario Karts, mario sport games are theyr?
Zelda's and Metriods are amazing buth they're pretty much the same game since the 80's.
I dont think XBOX flopped completly, it couldnt contend with Sony.