General Kaliero
F = ma, beeyotches.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
do remember sumthings. a great number of consoled of 360 are the ones with WHICH developers were having trouble with space/hardware/online etc. and lack of disk space.
Last I heard, no one is having problems developing for the 360 hardware. That's the PS3.
ofcourse, theoretically, u cud create an even BETTER console than ps3 and name it 360 but then, software and online capabilities arent shared with the old consoles.
What exactly are you saying here?
this is a problem, as a sizeable number of gamers who do have the old versions will either have to upgrade{and be angry for paying more} or not buy the game at all.
If you have the console, you can play the game meant for the console. It's pretty simple, really. This is not like computers, where you have to upgrade every six months.
this in the long term will affect both console and game sales. looking at the LACK of exclusives{see this is where WII wins, "QUALITY EXCLUSIVES/FRANCHISES},
The 360 has several very nice exclusives, so it's hard to understand where you're coming from. Also except for the in-house flagship series, the Wii really has very little in the "quality exclusives" area.
WHY shud sum1 buy a new suped up 360 with 120 gb harddraive which costs even MORE than ps3{not forgetting no free online membership}
The Elite, which comes with the 120GB HDD, is $399 currently, and was $479 at launch. That is not more than than even the 20GB PS3 model, which is $499. And even if you bought a $399 Premium ($299 now) and later upgraded with the $180 120GB HDD, that's still less than the $599 60GB PS3. So either way, you're getting twice the space that the best PS3 offers, for less money. Your attempted point here, quite simply, fails.
when they can just buy the ps3 which is still the better hardrware and has most of the same games as 360?
Because the better hardware is a moot point when not utilized properly, and the 360 still has several high-profile exclusives, and remains cheaper.
final fantasy 13 may be a blow, true, but still, if people have a choice, wudnt they rather buy a ps3 versus 360?
Overall sales say no.
also, 13 VERSUS is still exclusive to the ps3.
That's hardly the point. The next main segment of Square Enix's flagship series is no longer a PS3 exclusive. That is a huge blow for Sony, and spin-off exclusives are not going to lessen that blow.
again, if ur gonna go for a console, either buy wii, or the ps3. 360 is trying to be a jack of all trades and failing miserably as being master of any of em.
Now this amuses me, because it's the PS3 that everyone says tried to do everything - media system, Blu-Ray player, online browsing, oh and it plays games, too.
now if the newer versions of 360 and the ps3 were just being LAUNCHED, then maybe ude have sumthing to talk about, but currently, no.
Again, you make no sense.
oh hey, do NOT forget the built in blue ray player and winning blue ray technology over hd dvds.
Which is useful to a marginal percentage of people and thus not a mainstream pull.
360 cud have RULED the market, if they played their cards right and got more exclusives quicker as well as fix their hardware problems/paying membership etc etc. but they blew it.
Who
is ruling the market? It sure ain't Sony. Oh, that's right, it's Nintendo.
ps3 is just the better choice right now, unless ur going for 2 dollars a piece, perfectly pirated games, in which 360 is currently king due to the blue ray technology{yes thats a BIG reason why "game" sales are higher for the 360. even copiers need original to copy from}
Do you even listen to yourself? If overall game retail sales are higher, it's not because everyone is buying illegal pirated copies. You look like a fool.
otherwise, it really is like paying the same prive for a dvd versus a vhs of an original/certified disney movie.
Umm... what?