Abortion: Should parents need to be informed?

Disagreeing with abortion, Parents should be informed about their daughter's happening. A minor doesnt have the ability to rationalise as much as a parent especially in this case.

I think parents should be informed. After all, they should know what their little girl is doing behind their backs, if she's stupid enough to get herself pregnant. Way to go, bimbo-****...

Anyways, John Anderton's an idiot. 😂

Originally posted by GCG
Disagreeing with abortion, Parents should be informed about their daughter's happening. A minor doesnt have the ability to rationalise as much as a parent especially in this case.

Considering a minor is anyone under legal age, I'd say that's a drastic call.

-AC

Originally posted by GCG
Disagreeing with abortion, Parents should be informed about their daughter's happening. A minor doesnt have the ability to rationalise as much as a parent especially in this case.

What about if a girl has a baby young, without consulting a parent.

Then during her second pregnancy she will be a parent already, and can use her new rationalisation skills to terminate the baby.

Now that would be a loophole innit ?

I meant responsable Parents against abortion who know and believe that life starts at conception not at birth.

Originally posted by GCG
Now that would be a loophole innit ?

I meant responsable Parents against abortion who know and believe that life starts at conception not at birth.

Life starts at conception?

I say we don't stop there.

Let's make masturbation a crime of genocide.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom

Let's make masturbation a crime of genocide.

Men and women ejaculate without masturbation. Is that a crime of genocide ?

But the moment an egg is fertilised, it begins its path into life.

masterbation is reckless abandonment of a child

lol

Originally posted by GCG
Men and women ejaculate without masturbation. Is that a crime of genocide ?

But the moment an egg is fertilised, it begins its path into life.

Yet it is nowhere close to being human. It's just some cells.

Originally posted by GCG
But the moment an egg is fertilised, it begins its path into life.

Keywords being path to.

A white belt karate student is beginning a path to being a black belt. They're not actually a black belt just because they could conceivably become one.

-AC

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Yet it is nowhere close to being human. It's just some cells.

All humans have 46 chromosomes.

An egg has 23 and a sperm cell has 23. Once conjoined they have 46. Therofre yes I consider a human so at conception. Now thats my opinion like it or not.

Originally posted by GCG
All humans have 46 chromosomes.

An egg has 23 and a sperm cell has 23. Once conjoined they have 46. Therofre yes I consider a human so at conception. Now thats my opinion like it or not.

It being your opinion doesn't surround you in some ACME Nev-R-Rong shield. You're wrong.

You can consider it what you want, but the fact being that your considerations are false.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Keywords being path to.

A white belt karate student is beginning a path to being a black belt. They're not actually a black belt just because they could conceivably become one.

-AC

Of couurse you are right here. Now if i bring the abortion into the equation of your analogy, you dont become a black belt cause your sensei decided to amputate your leg and put you in a wheelchair for the rest of your life.

Originally posted by GCG
All humans have 46 chromosomes.

An egg has 23 and a sperm cell has 23. Once conjoined they have 46. Therofre yes I consider a human so at conception. Now thats my opinion like it or not.

That's what you call a syllogism.

All swans are white.

This bag is white.

This bag is a swan.

even after the moment of conception the heart doesnt begin to beat until day 17 into the beginning process...up till that point its just division and joining....not life....or I should say...not a baby.

Originally posted by GCG
Of couurse you are right here. Now if i bring the abortion into the equation of your analogy, you dont become a black belt cause your sensei decided to amputate your leg and put you in a wheelchair for the rest of your life.

Of course you don't. What's your point? (I know what your point is, but it's so laughably wrong that I'd like you to elaborate in the hope that you stop and go "Haha, silly me."😉

-AC

You tell me whats wrong with my point AC.

Originally posted by Ms Flower
even after the moment of conception the heart doesnt begin to beat until day 17 into the beginning process...up till that point its just division and joining....not life....or I should say...not a baby.

I am talking about life not heartbeats. Conception is the path to life. Once you halt the process of division you wont get a heart.

Originally posted by GCG
I am talking about life not heartbeats. Conception is the path to life. Once you halt the process of division you wont get a heart.

But you're not ending the life -- you're preventing it from beginning.

Originally posted by GCG
You tell me whats wrong with my point AC.

You took it upon yourself to change my analogy, you elaborate the point. The burden of proof is on you.

When you used the amputation analogy, what were you getting at? Oh, for excrement and laughter, let's just go with it.

There is a huge difference between a man purposefully sabotaging another man's life and career (bearing in mind he's already a human, already living, already having a life. Fact) and stopping a bunch of cells from becoming something that will become a child, for the better.

You are claiming to VALUE life but you are saying that ruining a man's life purposefully is equal to that of aborting cells to preserve another way of life.

Basically, you've cut your nose off to spite your face here.

Fact is, this whole debate is based around you CONSIDERING life to begin at conception. You are factually wrong there. So that puts an end to things.

-AC