Tournament Finals! *fanfare*

Started by stormfront1318 pages

Originally posted by jinzin
yeah I won he didn't.....

two people shoot at innocent bystanders... one hits one misses.. the one that missed by your logic is responsible for less of an immoral act than the one that hit his target...

hmmmm 🤨 great logic... 🙄

that's different.

the first shooter after he shot, provocted the second shooter. if the first shooter didn't shoot, then the second shooter wouldn't have either, that's what I'm basing this whole thing on

Originally posted by jinzin
yeah I won he didn't.....

two people shoot at innocent bystanders... one hits one misses.. the one that missed by your logic is responsible for less of an immoral act than the one that hit his target...

hmmmm 🤨 great logic... 🙄

Jinzin and Scooby in a fist fight then Scooby pulls out a gun and trys to shoot Jinzin...jinzin back kicks the gun but it still shot his leg but then jinzin gets scoobs gun and shoots him with his own gun in the head.

Jinzin is clearly the bad guy 😐

Originally posted by stormfront13
that's different.

the first shooter after he shot, provocted the second shooter. if the first shooter didn't shoot, then the second shooter wouldn't have either, that's what I'm basing this whole thing on

Scooby Shot first 😐

Originally posted by jinzin
you checked the claculations with certainty that they were correct yet you don't remember the "system" they went by?

I'm guessing they went by MATH.. but hey that's just me....

your calculations are off.. probably because of the bonus round.. but even then your previous statements don't make any sense.

it had something to do with who lost, and the bonus round coming earlier, idk it was months ago, though we both concluded that there were three, so when i found that you asked after the second, then this started.

Originally posted by stormfront13
that's different.

the first shooter after he shot, provocted the second shooter. if the first shooter didn't shoot, then the second shooter wouldn't have either, that's what I'm basing this whole thing on

their shooting at the same time.. one hits one misses who's done the immoral act?

in terms of your scenario however, then who's worse the first or second shooter?

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Scooby Shot first 😐

yes, but if scoobless hadn't of shot, then jinzin wouldn't have either, since he wants this to be fair.

Originally posted by stormfront13
it had something to do with who lost, and the bonus round coming earlier, idk it was months ago, though we both concluded that there were three, so when i found that you asked after the second, then this started.

there were three rounds INCLUDING the bonus round... [smilie]doh[smilie] next time you need to clarify your facts before making absurd accusations....

Originally posted by stormfront13
yes, but if scoobless hadn't of shot, then jinzin wouldn't have either, since he wants this to be fair.

yes.. and what's your point?

Originally posted by stormfront13
yes, but if scoobless hadn't of shot, then jinzin wouldn't have either, since he wants this to be fair.

So how is jinzin the badguy when the scooby started the whole thing 😕

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Jinzin and Scooby in a fist fight then Scooby pulls out a gun and trys to shoot Jinzin...jinzin back kicks the gun but it still shot his leg but then jinzin gets scoobs gun and shoots him with his own gun in the head.

Jinzin is clearly the bad guy 😐

😐

Originally posted by jinzin
their shooting at the same time.. one hits one misses who's done the immoral act?

in terms of your scenario however, then who's worse the first or second shooter?

there's the difference, scoob shoots first, then you shoot back. you both didn't ask at the same time, in which case then i would also hae this discussion with scoob. whose worse? the second shooter, because he hit someone. both are at fault, but second actually hit his target, making it a bit worse.

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
So how is jinzin the badguy when the scooby started the whole thing 😕

stormfront already explained his reasoning on that one.. cause jinzin won... 😕

Originally posted by jinzin
yes.. and what's your point?

if that was the case, then we wouldn't be aving this conversation

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
So how is jinzin the badguy when the scooby started the whole thing 😕

i consdier jinzins case worse because he won with the unfair tactic

Originally posted by stormfront13
there's the difference, scoob shoots first, then you shoot back. you both didn't ask at the same time, in which case then i would also hae this discussion with scoob. whose worse? the second shooter, because he hit someone. both are at fault, but second actually hit his target, making it a bit worse.

Killer breaks into your house, and he shoots at you...you dodge and shoot him in the head..then you go to jail...WTF

the killer is less evil that tried to kill you..than the selfdefense

Originally posted by stormfront13
if that was the case, then we wouldn't be aving this conversation

yes I'm aware of this fact.....

but as you said

Originally posted by stormfront13
yes, but if scoobless hadn't of shot, then jinzin wouldn't have either, since he wants this to be fair.

so then why are you pestering me about this whole mess? 🤨

your logic is quite full of gaps my friend.. you definitely need to rethink the premise to your argument here..

Originally posted by stormfront13
i consdier jinzins case worse because he won with the unfair tactic

two men shoot one man kills his target.. did the man who missed his target perform a less immoral act than the other who hit his?

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Killer breaks into your house, and he shoots at you...you dodge and shoot him in the head..then you go to jail...WTF

the killer is less evil that tried to kill you..than the selfdefense

Point is that if the killer is trying to kill you and you do nothing then duh the killer gets away with murder.....

Originally posted by jinzin

so then why are you pestering me about this whole mess? 🤨

your logic is quite full of gaps my friend.. you definitely need to rethink the premise to your argument here..

well i was ready to wuit a while ago, but everyone kept posting. i would not be talking to you right now if you hadn't of asked for votes. but you did, and you won with that tactic, that's the reason behind all this.

Cough read my post cough