Originally posted by jinzin
yeah I won he didn't.....two people shoot at innocent bystanders... one hits one misses.. the one that missed by your logic is responsible for less of an immoral act than the one that hit his target...
hmmmm 🤨 great logic... 🙄
that's different.
the first shooter after he shot, provocted the second shooter. if the first shooter didn't shoot, then the second shooter wouldn't have either, that's what I'm basing this whole thing on