Tournament Finals! *fanfare*

Started by stormfront1318 pages
Originally posted by jinzin
two men shoot one man kills his target.. did the man who missed his target perform a less immoral act than the other who hit his?

no, both are at fault, but the man who hit his target would be consdiered worse for me

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Killer breaks into your house, and he shoots at you...you dodge and shoot him in the head..then you go to jail...WTF

the killer is less evil that tried to kill you..than the selfdefense

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
Point is that if the killer is trying to kill you and you do nothing then duh the killer gets away with murder.....

yes, obviously. what's your point? the killer would be at fault, but if he is truly a killer, then he might have done this before, which would make him more at fault, because this isn't the first time.

Cough read my post cough

i don't have the time to respond to your pathetic posts

Originally posted by stormfront13
no, both are at fault, but the man who hit his target would be consdiered worse for me

who's at fault is not in question.. which one of them performed the more immoral ACT... (hint: consequence does not matter as consequence comes AFTER the act in question) ?

Originally posted by stormfront13
yes, obviously. what's your point? the killer would be at fault, but if he is truly a killer, then he might have done this before, which would make him more at fault, because this isn't the first time.

i don't have the time to respond to your pathetic posts

Your bitter mode is back on 🙄

Ok storm, next time some guy tries to kill you in your house...do NOTHING to DEFEND youself because it's wrong 🙄

Originally posted by stormfront13

i don't have the time to respond to your pathetic posts

stop projecting yourself on twister...

Originally posted by jinzin
who's at fault is not in question.. which one of them performed the more immoral ACT... (hint: consequence does not matter as consequence comes AFTER the act in question) ?

well both have performed immoral acts, but imo, the person who has completed their goal by doing something like this has performed the more immoral act.

Originally posted by jinzin
stop projecting yourself on twister...

all he does is give me analogies to try and figure the reasoning behind what i think. he's like your back-up

Originally posted by stormfront13
well both have performed immoral acts, but imo, the person who has completed their goal by doing something like this has performed the more immoral act.

if they both had the same intention when they ACTED.. the degree of immorality is the same... 😕

personal opinion doesn't change that...

Originally posted by stormfront13
all he does is give me analogies to try and figure the reasoning behind what i think. he's like your back-up

lay off him.. he's a good kid and he made a good analogy... your obscure reasoning doesn't chage what he did...

Originally posted by Creshosk
Try an d tell me that Scoobless didn't indirectly (yeah I noticed his use of words when defending himself) influence some of his votes.

i'd like to think i influenced everyone who voted for me

🙄

Originally posted by Scoobless
i'd like to think i influenced everyone who voted for me

🙄

😂

good point..

😛

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
^^ thats so stupid no offence..I mean Scooby would of won because he cheated FIRST.

prove it!

Originally posted by stormfront13
that's different.

the first shooter after he shot, provocted the second shooter. if the first shooter didn't shoot, then the second shooter wouldn't have either, that's what I'm basing this whole thing on

And the second shooter hit something, clearly its soley his fault.

*slaps head*

Try to play nice. Mudslinging (if you absolutely need to do any of this) can take place in the general tourney discussion thread. Keep it outa the battles.

Originally posted by Creshosk
And the second shooter hit something, clearly its soley his fault.

i have already explained my reasoning, i don't think i need to explain myself anymore.

Just hat to laugh on what it says under your sig Digi. Is it that bad you got to post it lmao...why don't you make that link a linke...add url to it so people can clicl it.

Originally posted by stormfront13
i have already explained my reasoning, i don't think i need to explain myself anymore.
The defense rests?

Verdict: Guilty.

<<The defense rests?>.

good. damn, EVERYONE give it a rest.

i haven't read a damn thing about this match in about 5 pages. i DO know jin pm'd votes. (though he didn't pm me . . . should i be insulted
😄?) i know scoob pm'd votes. apparently first. (damn, my opinion 'round here really DOESN'T mean a damn thing, does it . . .?) i know storm thinks jin's was the worse offense because he won. i know that logic is kinda . . . 😑 i know cresh is defending (ad nauseum, sorry cresh) jinzin.

what i don't know -- do most think jin's shield tactic is viable? how does jinzin plan on getting through the doc's shield that was in such debate against khell? you've really posted a lot on how you plan to avoid being sliced/shocked/shot, but i've not read a lot on just how you plan to actually attack shock assuming your defenses will stand up. and maybe digi could clear up the grey area of this magnetic attack lp's so hip on. IS it viable, digi?

damn, get back to the match already. this bickering is ruining what should be a great final and what has up til now been an entertaining tourny.

Originally posted by leonidas
<<The defense rests?>.

good. damn, EVERYONE give it a rest.

i haven't read a damn thing about this match in about 5 pages. i DO know jin pm'd votes. (though he didn't pm me . . . should i be insulted
😄?) i know scoob pm'd votes. apparently first. (damn, my opinion 'round here really DOESN'T mean a damn thing, does it . . .?) i know storm thinks jin's was the worse offense because he won. i know that logic is kinda . . . 😑 i know cresh is defending (ad nauseum, sorry cresh) jinzin.

what i don't know -- do most think jin's shield tactic is viable? how does jinzin plan on getting through the doc's shield that was in such debate against khell? you've really posted a lot on how you plan to avoid being sliced/shocked/shot, but i've not read a lot on just how you plan to actually attack shock assuming your defenses will stand up. and maybe digi could clear up the grey area of this magnetic attack lp's so hip on. IS it viable, digi?

damn, get back to the match already. this bickering is ruining what should be a great final and what has up til now been an entertaining tourny.

HEY! I didn't get vote solicitations either! Maybe it's cuz we actually know what we're talking about, so influencing us would take more effort than, "Hey, I'm cool, go to this link and say 'I vote Jinzin!'"... Or everyone just hates us. We should each find a corner to cry in. And then we should each write a song about our experiences with crying in corners. Think, leo. We could be EMO!!!

Anyhoo, as to the actual questions...

I don't see why Venom/Taskmaster shouldn't be able to pull a web shield together. It's not especially rocket science-esque.

I STILL have no idea how strong Lady Ock's shield really is. It's taken some hits, but Scarlet Spider did KO her by launching her through a wall. Venom>SS, physically speaking. (or at least that's my logic...)

I thought he was attacking with symbiote tenticles. He uses enough of them to grab Ock's tenticles, and try the "short circuit Electro" thing, or he just goes for the face.

And as to magnetising adamantium... I'm pretty sure that if manipulating an energy shield counts as tk, taking control of another person's body and flinging him around is too. The rule pretty much was that if you want the other guy to go flying, it's gotta be done by a blast or your fists.

Oh, and I definitely love how this degenerated from a tourney fight into "jin and twister vs. stormfront: Who's a bigger *******, Scoob for cheating first, or Jinzin, for winning by cheating?" It's an epic battle of morality. I say we cook and eat both, then get on with our lives.