Originally posted by jinzin"He doesn't have a shot, not even with bone claw?"
ummm no 😕... but i understand how your use of "logic" would lead you to that conclusion... doh
Fanboyism at its finest.
Hulk and Juggernauts occupations are not wolverine villans, therefore they are not... wolverine villans.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
"He doesn't have a shot, not even with bone claw?"Fanboyism at its finest.
Hulk and Juggernauts occupations are not wolverine villans, therefore they are not... wolverine villans.
Sabertooth's occupation is Professional assassin, guess since it's not "Wolverine villian" he's not a Wolverine villian.
Venom's occupation is listed as former journalist, I guess since it's not listed as Spiderman villian, he's not a spiderman villian.
Carnage's occupation is listed as convict, I guess since his occupation isn't "Spiderman villian" he's not a spiderman villian.
The first green goblin's occupation is listed as Professional criminal, owner and president of Osborn Industries, I guess he too isn't a Spiderman villian.
I can't find any character that's listed as "villian of" anyone. So I guess there are no such things as villians.
A rogue of a hero or team is a character intended to be a primary antagonist of said hero or team, commonly this may be apparent from their very conception. A rogue of a team may also be intended to be a primary antagonist of a specific character of that team, in which case they may be considered the rogue of that character personally also. The intention in the rogue character's formulation is to act as specific antagonist of that character, although they may also antagonise (other) entire teams or other characters, and they may antagonise multiple characters in such a fashion i.e. they may be a rogue of multiple heroes (however more often a rogue has an exclusive relationship to a hero). This personal individual antagonism being designed and illustrated by the history set out in the rogue's principle characterization and the actions and intentions of said rogue in multiple story arcs in specifically machinating against and opposing an individual hero.
You need to get out, talk about trains of thought... I guess that makes the other characters not heroes since they have ordinary jobs?
Originally posted by Creshosk
Sabertooth's occupation is Professional assassin, guess since it's not "Wolverine villian" he's not a Wolverine villian.Venom's occupation is listed as former journalist, I guess since it's not listed as Spiderman villian, he's not a spiderman villian.
Carnage's occupation is listed as convict, I guess since his occupation isn't "Spiderman villian" he's not a spiderman villian.
The first green goblin's occupation is listed as Professional criminal, owner and president of Osborn Industries, I guess he too isn't a Spiderman villian.
I can't find any character that's listed as "villian of" anyone. So I guess there are no such things as villians.
How dense, they are created for the purpose of being an antagonist, hulk was not created to antagonize wolverine. Abomination was created to antagonize hulk. ETc, end of story.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterHey you were the asstard that cam up with "Hulk's occupations isn't villan of wplverine, therefore he isn't a wolverine villian.
You need to get out, talk about trains of thought... I guess that makes the other characters not heroes since they have ordinary jobs?
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterAh, BNut Wolverine WAS created to antagonize the Hulk. So I guess Kingpin isn't a DD rogue, despite the frequent antagonizing of his character.
How dense, they are created for the purpose of being an antagonist, hulk was not created to antagonize wolverine. Abomination was created to antagonize hulk. ETc, end of story.
Hey how about the hand is that DD's or Wolverine?
Originally posted by CreshoskSo if in ANY case that would make wolverine a MINOR hulk villan but not the other way around, cute though...
Hey you were the asstard that cam up with "Hulk's occupations isn't villan of wplverine, therefore he isn't a wolverine villian.Ah, BNut Wolverine WAS created to antagonize the Hulk. So I guess Kingpin isn't a DD rogue, despite the frequent antagonizing of his character.
Hey how about the hand is that DD's or Wolverine?
And he isn't currently anyways, quite like kingpin, no need for this...
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterSo a character can be a rogue to one person, but not the other way around.
So if in ANY case that would make wolverine a MINOR hulk villan but not the other way around, cute though...And he isn't currently anyways, quite like kingpin, no need for this...
I love all these self contradictory conditionals you set up that have no logical backing. 😆
Anything to give Spiderman the win? 😄
Originally posted by Tha C-Master😆 That's going off of your definition which already has the problem with DD and the King pin. 😉
Was hulk made to antagonize wolverine? Or magneto?
Sorry, your definition is flawed and can't be used.
Originally posted by who?-kidSorry, I don't see the personal connection there. 😆 And spiderman wasn't created in a hulk comic or vice versa, same can't be said of the canadian midget.
Just following some peoples erm "logic"...
Originally posted by DarkCrawlerNope, being ion the same team would kinda negate that. 😄
Namor has fough Hulk twice as much as Wolverine, probably...Namor = Hulk villain? Vice versa?
Even though they are in same team?
As I went over with X when he suggested that Emma was a Storm rogue.
You guys are really reaching here. 😄
Originally posted by Creshosk
Sorry, I don't see the personal connection there. 😆 And spiderman wasn't created in a hulk comic or vice versa, same can't be said of the canadian midget.
I guess your sarcasm detector wasn't on. Some people here tried to sell us that Hulk is a Wolverine villain, because they fight a lot.
I followed that flawed logic and said if that's true, Spider-Man would be a Hulk villain too, because he has at least (probably more) fought the Hulk as Wolverine.
See ? Not so difficult.
Originally posted by who?-kidNo you created your own bad logic by not following what was said on the matter and strawmanning by ignorieing everything else so you could exagerate the point. Thus invalidating it. 🙂
(Deep, deep sigh...)I guess your sarcasm detector wasn't on. Some people here tried to sell us that Hulk is a Wolverine villain, because they fight a lot.
I followed that flawed logic and said if that's true, Spider-Man would be a Hulk villain too, because he has at least (probably more) fought the Hulk as Wolverine.
See ? Not so difficult.