Execution of Saddam?

Originally posted by Wonderer
I agree, but I also think that this very arrogant and plain stupid American politicians should leave the rest of the world alone - how would they feel if the rest of the world tries to rule them?

Well considering the land they inhabit was English theyve all ready experianced that.

Whats with all the pacifistic utopian left wingers on here? Saddam must be punished. Everyone is reedemable, but some have to die to be redeemed. Saddam must face the justice. Of course everyone on here who thnks executing will make him a martyr has a good point, but as for those who believe it is inhumane.....

Well its inhumane to murder people with gas isnt it? Thats what he did. He deserves death. Stop with the left wing (BLEEP)! Its people like you who make the world and our homes easier targets for these scum. Anyone who thinks Saddam doesnt deserve death because of ethics is a complete idiot who's living onm another planet.

And who are you to decide who deserves to live or die? You don't have that right, unless you like being a murderer.

You apparently are clueless as to how the real world works. Execute him, and we risk turning him into a martyr for the terrorist cause. Keeping him alive but in prison is the much better option because it'll not only show his followers that he is only human and subject to the same punishments as anyone else, but also that we took the moral high ground because we chose to not kill him.

You make a good point Alana. But I personally dont mind being the one to kill him.

I think it'd be much more degrading to have him in prison the rest of his life than to execute him. Kill him and he gets to go out with a bang. A better punishment is to let him rot and watch himself fade into obscurity. Though I do believe that he deserves to die.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I A better punishment is to let him rot and watch himself fade into obscurity.

I guess that is a better punishment. He can stew in what his life has become or will become and he will only have himself to blame. ✅

These forums have gone to hell in a bucket......

Originally posted by Trickster
I don't think he should be executed. Not publicly. As people have said, it creates a martyr - but also it makes America look worse than it does already. And if he's not, they'll be accused of cowardice. Hopefully, at least for the US and Britain, he'll commit suicide.

Like Hitler

I doubt Saddam will be viewed as a martyr; he did **** all but kill fellow Muslims himself.

Just do it, get it over with, and move on.

Originally posted by GCG
I doubt Saddam will be viewed as a martyr; he did **** all but kill fellow Muslims himself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trials_of_Saddam_Hussein

Originally posted by Inspectah Deck
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trials_of_Saddam_Hussein

What did you link wikipedia for ?

Originally posted by GCG
What did you link wikipedia for ?

Because they paid me

for sex whistling

Originally posted by Mišt
for sex whistling

no2

Originally posted by Lana
And who are you to decide who deserves to live or die? You don't have that right, unless you like being a murderer.

You apparently are clueless as to how the real world works. Execute him, and we risk turning him into a martyr for the terrorist cause. Keeping him alive but in prison is the much better option because it'll not only show his followers that he is only human and subject to the same punishments as anyone else, but also that we took the moral high ground because we chose to not kill him.

Well on the grounds of the piece ....."who are you to decide who deserves to live or die," instead of taking a life you merely make the decision for that person that they will be confined for the rest of their life. Either way you are taking something from that person without letting them choose..........either or, you are still playing God.

Jail doesn't make a man degrade over time Nelson Mandella is a good example.

Killing someone and letting them spend the rest of their life in confinement are two totally different things, Soleran.

Originally posted by Wonderer
how would they feel if the rest of the world tries to rule them?

America being under imposition by others, you mean?

Well let's see here:

The U.N. and foreign whizzkid George Soros endlessly funding a treaty for 06' that would impose on the U.S. 2nd Amendment by making all private gun ownership in America totally illegal with the exception of military, police, and oh yeah i forgot, Michael Moore and the UN and the society rich and elite (including the politicians.)

All of our hunting and shooting traditions taken away from the public and given to hypocritical "gun haters" like John Kerry, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clunton and Ted Kenndy, the man whose car killed more people than most legally bought and owned guns now in America's hands. Foreign and international case law imposed on our Bill Of Rights and our Constitutional amendments.

What makes politicians and other rich people any more deserving of
the right to hunt, shoot, and bust a few clay pigeons at a trap range? What because they're rich and we aren't? we don't need Kofi Annan's permission to own a gun (or Michael Moore's for that matter.)

America's religious and holiday traditions under attack from Atheists,
as well as Jews and Muslims. (funny considering the last 2 have disagreed with each other for the last 200 years) You can say
Kwanzaa or Hanukah all you want on TV, but God forbid you say "Merry Christmas" or "God Bless" to someone, you're automatically stepping on someone and forcing God down their throats...

Oh not to mention the idiot down the street who sues his neighbor because her Christmas decorations go against HIS religious edicts. Oh and the people who have strokes over Santa Claus being on the side of a soda can...here we go. This is a REAL winner.

The ACLU standing behind people who print books instructing illegal immigrants on how to infiltrate America from the Mexican border, saying it's a violation of Free Speech to not print such material. Dosen't matter if violent gangs are shooting back at police on our borders, it's still Freedom Of Speech..Where does it say America has to accomodate illegal activity as part of it's concession to others?

The human rights people screaming because Mexicans die from dehydration in their illegal treks across the border, screaming for watering stations, while they say absolutely nothing about the kidnapping, beheading and torture of every Western or pro-Western person Al Qaeda gets their hands on in Iraq or elsewhere.

Yeah as you can see, no other country, or any special interest group attached to them, has ever used THEIR ideals religions, or principals to impose on the good old US of A.
🙄

Originally posted by Dagons Blade
America being under imposition by others, you mean?

Well let's see here:

The U.N. and foreign whizzkid George Soros endlessly funding a treaty for 06' that would impose on the U.S. 2nd Amendment by making all private gun ownership in America totally illegal with the exception of military, police, and oh yeah i forgot, Michael Moore and the UN and the society rich and elite (including the politicians.)

All of our hunting and shooting traditions taken away from the public and given to hypocritical "gun haters" like John Kerry, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clunton and Ted Kenndy, the man whose car killed more people than most legally bought and owned guns now in America's hands. Foreign and international case law imposed on our Bill Of Rights and our Constitutional amendments.

What makes politicians and other rich people any more deserving of
the right to hunt, shoot, and bust a few clay pigeons at a trap range? What because they're rich and we aren't? we don't need Kofi Annan's permission to own a gun (or Michael Moore's for that matter.)

America's religious and holiday traditions under attack from Atheists,
as well as Jews and Muslims. (funny considering the last 2 have disagreed with each other for the last 200 years) You can say
Kwanzaa or Hanukah all you want on TV, but God forbid you say "Merry Christmas" or "God Bless" to someone, you're automatically stepping on someone and forcing God down their throats...

Oh not to mention the idiot down the street who sues his neighbor because her Christmas decorations go against HIS religious edicts. Oh and the people who have strokes over Santa Claus being on the side of a soda can...here we go. This is a REAL winner.

The ACLU standing behind people who print books instructing illegal immigrants on how to infiltrate America from the Mexican border, saying it's a violation of Free Speech to not print such material. Dosen't matter if violent gangs are shooting back at police on our borders, it's still Freedom Of Speech..Where does it say America has to accomodate illegal activity as part of it's concession to others?

The human rights people screaming because Mexicans die from dehydration in their illegal treks across the border, screaming for watering stations, while they say absolutely nothing about the kidnapping, beheading and torture of every Western or pro-Western person Al Qaeda gets their hands on in Iraq or elsewhere.

Yeah as you can see, no other country, or any special interest group attached to them, has ever used THEIR ideals religions, or principals to impose on the good old US of A.
🙄

Originally posted by Imagawa666
Then he doesnt deserve to die for all his crimes? Funny that. How come Its ok to execute murderers in the USA, but when its a war criminal whos commited genocide its not ok? I'm boggled with the stupidity....

Agreed.

Well you know the answer to that one...Stalin said that the death of ONE person was a tragedy, but the death of millions was a statistic. And you know how them thar' dicktators work, they're always trying to beat the previous high scores set in Europe from 1914-1918 and again from 1939-1945. So when THEY do it, rest assured it's only a game and they're trying to beat the high scores 🙄 🙄 🙄

Originally posted by FeceMan
I love you.

Aww...big HUG 😮