Character Ownage

Started by Gecko4lif5,121 pages

Why is hulk bald btw

Doom shaved him, shaved him so hard his hair cannot grow back.

Because Telly Savalas is The Hulk!

Doc Ock owns hulk

What. The. Fukc...

I mean the Batman Superman pic.

Originally posted by SamZED
What. The. Fukc...

I mean the Batman Superman pic.

Lulz that pre crisis bs its funny when Batman "died Superman didn't cry

Originally posted by TheGodKiller

This is pure gold.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller

Just don't make any sense why he is the way he is. Northstar would love to meet Superman.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Super hearing is a *****. LOL. Pansy Kent

Originally posted by abhilegend
Doc Ock owns hulk
hulk was "holding back"

Abhi wouldn't have known that because he only looks at low fts.

I like when people feel the need to defend their chars when they are owned. Not talking about psycho or carver in particular. Just an observation. Abi and Biensalsa and almost everyone else do it.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
I like when people feel the need to defend their chars when they are owned. Not talking about psycho or carver in particular. Just an observation. Abi and Biensalsa and almost everyone else do it.

In most cases there is some outside circumstance that is being purposely ignored when a character gets owned unceremoniously. Unless the character is Thor... then it just happens frequently for no reason. 😎

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
😆

You say that you don't need anyone to draw your attention to the fact that tips of Wolverine's claws are visible on the panel... and yet here you are, a dozen or so posts removed, still ignoring that fact. The artist drew Wolverine's claws pointed. The pointed section of the claws were drawn outside of Wolverine's skull. The very tips of the claws are the portion that meets in a point (duh). Ergo, Wolverine never stabbed himself in the brain.

You can gripe about effect positioning, and cry about the way Wolverine's arm is posed in one panel, until the cows come home, but at the end of the day it's all irrelevant. Based on the art as depicted on panel Wolverine wasn't stabbed in the brain. If you have a problem that I suggest you head to twitter and ask the artist why he decided not to draw Wolverine stabbing through his adamantium skull... as though that is a question that needs to be answered.

No, I don't need somebody manipulating scans with their own coloring to obfuscate the panel itself. All I see are Wolverine's claws shoved straight into his own skull. I know this because his arm is awkwardly stuck into the same position after being laid out, the holes in his mask are larger than pinpoint pricks, and Thing is mocking him for stabbing himself:

I don't need to appeal to Twitter to read the plainly obvious. Here, Mindless Hulk made Wolverine stab himself through the head. Coming from the guy that argued Wolverine never had a bullet penetrate his skull, what else do I expect from you other than your whining insistence to the contrary?

Sh1t happens in comics you don't like. Shocker, I know. Stop trying to convince me that it isn't occurring because it's pretty obvious to a 7-year old what's going on. You can argue that it should never have happened. Just don't ague that it didn't happen. Because it did. Clearly. Unequivocally.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Great strength feat for Hulk, great healing feat for Wolverine.
Yup. 👆

Originally posted by psycho gundam
hulk was "holding back"


PAD was a butthurt ***** at that showing. He directly insulted Larsen by making hulk quote "Petty Larceny". That was just his excuse to redeem hulk, when we saw ock own him fairly easily after hulk tried to sneak attack him.

Originally posted by carver9
Abhi wouldn't have known that because he only looks at low fts.

Don't presume you know me. I'm perfectly aware of hulk beating ock later.

Originally posted by carver9
Abhi wouldn't have known that because he only looks at low fts.

😂 Sure.

Originally posted by abhilegend
PAD was a butthurt ***** at that showing. He directly insulted Larsen by making hulk quote "Petty Larceny". That was just his excuse to redeem hulk, when we saw ock own him fairly easily after hulk tried to sneak attack him.
sure. it was a spider-man comic after all so he WILL be the deciding factor 99% of the time. but honestly, it was a low showing cause beating even merged hulk was i believe the highest showing for doc ock up to that point and hulk was being written down pretty bad in that arc, even using him to hype up a ka-zar/spider-man villain: gog by oneshotting hulk