Originally posted by Fifthchild
Undeniable that he powered them up (not sure how one could misinterpret that part) but i think its equally obvious that they weren't amped beyond normal Kryptonian levels - Apollo was merely responsible for them not having Kryypto-noob powerlevels from a limited exposure to the sun.
Quite a feat for Wonder Woman if true they WERE amped beyond Superman level that first time around ...
Handling not one but two opponents physically superior to Superman in the first fight? Got to admit, I rather like the implications of that.
http://oi62.tinypic.com/29usvn7.jpg
http://oi60.tinypic.com/6y16b8.jpg
http://oi57.tinypic.com/2e1d8ow.jpg
http://oi59.tinypic.com/209r4ed.jpg
http://oi60.tinypic.com/2n0qvl.jpg
http://oi59.tinypic.com/x573ps.jpg
http://oi60.tinypic.com/27xpfcz.jpg
http://oi60.tinypic.com/8voj8l.jpg
-------------------------
Ignore the rest of this post.
The remainder is largely to aid in transferring this info to Google search engines instead of KMC's crappy ones so I can find the showing in the future and not have to search through a thousand pages.
Also to see if working links can be created for pages of threads that do not yet exist but soon will.
1. crucifix imagery, christantichrist imagery, christ/antichrist imagery, sun god sungod sun of a god songod godson godsun. note as superman and wonder woman activate Heph's special suits' trump card that clark and diana are in christ crucified poses, with a brilliant white cross of light in the background besides. zod and faora getting dumped in the drink. echo. "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven". Apollo equals Lucifer equals Dragon.
Empowers the (two) defeated beast(s) ...
2. expaireement
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=382350&pagenumber=2610
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=382350&pagenumber=2612
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=382350&pagenumber=2613
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lol. Your search terms are very strange. Either that, or you don't really have an idea of the general public's search patterns.
You're largely correct.
In general, I DON'T really have an idea of the general public's search patterns.
But the strangeness is deliberate.
I'm not particularly worried about someone thinking me strange in an online forum, where, to the world at large, I am a random collection of words.
I'm concerned more with how effective the methods I use will be for my intended purpose or purposes. And I rarely have just one.
I'm genuinely interested to know how you'd go about such a thing now.
How would you arrange things so that you could find an entry, on a page of 20 posts, in a thread of over two thousand five hundred PAGES of 20 posts?
Whatever your answer, note that my odd word construction limits the hits I'll get on Google in the future to a relative handful.
In fact, at the moment, for the word "expaireement", there is only one Google hit. The second will almost certainly be mine, and unlikely anymore will join it for a long, long time.
So I eliminate a search on KMC that would take who-knows-how-long, to one where I type in a single word on Google and have my entry found in 10 seconds flat.
If you've got a better method than that, I'd like to know it.
