Character Ownage

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I don't consider Infinite Crisis or Final Crisis to be ages ago:

I mean... really... you hold up half a building's weight with a grip on glass window panes? You hold up an ancient pyramid without it breaking apart? I'm not saying tactile kinesis is a substitute for strength, but there's no other explanation for these feats.

Oh... and before someone accuses me of spamming debate int he ownage thread, here's some more ownage. My two favorite Green Lanterns... but only one could win the fight:

Originally posted by Galan007
i'd lean more towards writer error, myself.

meaning; i doubt the staff of DC thought twice [or even cared] about those events, beyond what they were *mainly* intended to depict [ie. strength feats.] if tactile TK would have also been a consideration for them, i'm sure some kind of reference would've been made/alluded to.

pretty much, people always have the strong characters do that kind of stuff with pure strength.

Originally posted by namorsubby

.....as Namor is to Mr. Marvel.lol

Originally posted by SamZED
😆 Please tell me where's that from?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
well, i'm not saying that, all the ttk is for in my opinion is to prevent things from crumbling from the aforementioned effects, be it from flight or being lifted.

and i have no issue with that.

Originally posted by carver9
I dont think its a low showing since we dont have any kind of strength feats to back up his moon feat. We seen him pull it with the aid of people, we have even seen him have a harness on tugging the planet BUT pushing, or setting a moon back into its place, never happened.

he has PLENTY of strength feats of equal or higher measure. and the earth harness feat still counts, as it's still his strength being used.

given his other feats, it IS a low showing.

Originally posted by Galan007
i'd lean more towards writer error, myself.

meaning; i doubt the staff of DC thought twice [or even cared] about those events, beyond what they were *mainly* intended to depict [ie. strength feats.] if tactile TK would have also been a consideration for them, i'm sure some kind of reference would've been made/alluded to.

pretty much.

Originally posted by Galan007
i'd lean more towards writer error, myself.

Originally posted by guy222

so its safe to assume Moon Knight is due for a major upgrade?

Wow, they're really trying to force the entire Batman/Superman dynamic a bit too hard there.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
so its safe to assume Moon Knight is due for a major upgrade?

time will tell

Originally posted by guy222
time will tell

i heart you guy 🙄

Never try to anger Carter Hall.

He will go Ultra Violence on yo ass!

Originally posted by -Pr-
and i have no issue with that.

he has PLENTY of strength feats of equal or higher measure. and the earth harness feat still counts, as it's still his strength being used.

given his other feats, it IS a low showing.

pretty much.

Show me these strength feats and its hard to even tell anything about that earth moving feat since we dont know how much of the earth the gl was pulling. Superman could have been moving 1% of the planet and it could have been gl doing all the work.

Show me these strength feats that proves he can move the moon.

Originally posted by carver9
Show me these strength feats and its hard to even tell anything about that earth moving feat since we dont know how much of the earth the gl was pulling. Superman could have been moving 1% of the planet and it could have been gl doing all the work.

Show me these strength feats that proves he can move the moon.

we don't know the percentages, so the logical conclusion is that each man was pulling half, which was well above the mass/weight of the moon.

how about lifting at least half of a book that contained infinite pages, and he wasn't even struggling?

Originally posted by Galan007
i'd lean more towards writer error, myself.

meaning; i doubt the staff of DC thought twice [or even cared] about those events, beyond what they were *mainly* intended to depict [ie. strength feats.] if tactile TK would have also been a consideration for them, i'm sure some kind of reference would've been made/alluded to.

Are people trying to downplay Superman based on the New Krypton issue with Jupiter's moon?

Apparently they ignored the part where they used some kind of weird Kryptonian technology to put it in some kind of dimensional bubble that needed to be broken first before attempting to move it. That's what the Thanagarians were there for.

Superman has moved the earth's moon by himself multiple times in the past. This incident doesn't somehow make all of those disappear.

Originally posted by -Pr-
we don't know the percentages, so the logical conclusion is that each man was pulling half, which was well above the mass/weight of the moon.

how about lifting at least half of a book that contained infinite pages, and he wasn't even struggling?

How much did that book weigh?

Sentry lifted the cosmic cube, how much did that weigh? 😕

Originally posted by carver9
How much did that book weigh?

Sentry lifted the cosmic cube, how much did that weigh? 😕

infinity.

How much does one page weigh? Multiply that as much as humanly possible and you have your answer 😱

Originally posted by -Pr-
infinity.

So the book has infinite weight? Superman should have been able to move the earth with his pinky if he lifted something with infinite weight.

He should have also been able to rip through Superman prime like nothing.

Is there some kind of evidence that supports your case that the book weighed that much or is this something that you used some kind of caculations on?