Darth Sion vs Yoda

Originally posted by kingkman
Easier said than done. The Exile was a much greater duelist than Darth Sion but that doesn't mean than Sion couldn't have defended his vital organs properly. He's not just some shit ass duelist.

This ties into Janus' post. If the Exile was the superior duelist to Sion, then why was the Exile forced to erode Sion's will instead of hacking him to pieces?

He was 'forced' to break Sion because he wasn't able to hack him into pieces. He was a better duelist than Sion but wasn't good enough to hack him into pieces.

That begs for proof there.

If the Exile was better (Debatable... certainly not proven canonically, unless you consider Battle Precog enough to make Exile > Sion in lightsaber combat), why would he not be able to simply bisect Sion or lop off a hand?

Originally posted by Darth Traya
This ties into Janus' post.

Why don't you let Janus try to prove me wrong?

I think he just did.

Why don't you do it right now chump?

Yeah, I didn't think so.

Apparently you can't respond directly to my points above. This is probably because you're a multi-posting noob and overall moron. So please, stfu and go away.

Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
I think everyone's making unsupported assumptions when dealing with Sion and declaring it evident and logical truth. This is not the case.

Sion's body is described literally as being "broken, fractured" and obviously burnt and scarred in thousands of different places. I don't need to bust into a medical lesson to remind everyone how infeasible it is for a body to remain like that without almost supernatural aid. And indeed, Sion is described many times as surviving through his sheer will and control of the Force alone. It is only when he gives up the will to live and survive that he falls apart.

What instances are there of Sion being susceptible to blaster bolts? None. Lightsaber strikes? None. If anything, why would the Exile be forced into fighting Sion's will when he could be reasonably hacking his body into pieces? Wouldn't hacking Sion apart be easier? Or something else like kicking him into the Malachor V core?

I think you guys need to add conditionals to your observations on Sion; specifically, IF Sion can be hacked part THEN Person A may/may not be able to do it. Otherwise, you need to prove that Sion's will and power of the Force can be overcome by a lightsaber (When canonically it never was.)

Way to quote.

Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
That begs for proof there.

If the Exile was better (Debatable... certainly not proven canonically, unless you consider Battle Precog enough to make Exile > Sion in lightsaber combat), why would he not be able to simply bisect Sion or lop off a hand?

The fact that The Exile was repeatedly able to beat Sion in a lightsaber duel basically proves that he was a better duelist.

So you think that every time the Exile lowered his -health bar- that it's a direct victory over Sion in lightsaber combat? I don't see that as logical at all.

Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
So you think that every time the Exile lowered his -health bar- that it's a direct victory over Sion in lightsaber combat? I don't see that as logical at all.

Yes, I do think that it is logical that when The Exile fully depletes an enemy's health bar, he defeats them as they do tend to die you fool. How is that not logical?

It's a game mechanic. By this logic Brianna the Handmaiden killed Atris, but Atris then apparently had Wolverine's mutant healing factor and survived, only to pwn Brianna with force lightning.

Health bars are a game mechanic to show the player how close they are to completing the battle, not how dead the opponent is.

You're the fool here.

Firstly, the last time that I played KOTOR was about a year ago so don't just dish out random facts that have hardly any evidence to the argument. 99% of the time the health bar represents the amount of life the oponent has and when the bar is fully depleted, the opponent has no more energy and so dies. This is during normal combat. The 1% represents the boss battles.

Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
Health bars are a game mechanic to show the player how close they are to completing the battle, not how dead the opponent is.

I didn't say they represent how "dead" someone is, I said they represent an opponent's life, which is true.

Which Sion is a boss. There you have it. You just pwned your own argument.

Originally posted by kingkman
I didn't say they represent how "dead" someone is, I said they represent an opponent's life, which is true.

No, they don't... because the Handmaiden lowers Atris' lifebar entirely and Atris merely pwns her and then fights the exile... with a brand new health bar. It's a game mechanic. Don't argue game mechanics.

If you had read my comment from above, you would see that I said 99% of the time. The 1% represented boss battles and this was due to things such as dialogue afterwards or the boss coming back at a later stage. Atris is a boss you idiot.

Originally posted by kingkman
If you had read my comment from above, you would see that I said 99% of the time. The 1% represented boss battles and this was due to things such as dialogue afterwards or the boss coming back at a later stage. Atris is a boss you idiot.

You are dense, and a waste of my time.