Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
So you think that every time the Exile lowered his -health bar- that it's a direct victory over Sion in lightsaber combat? I don't see that as logical at all.
You obviously do not know how to interpret the way KOTOR worked at all do you. Please explain how you interpret the way duels work in KOTOR because you seem to be way off of the mark here.
Okay, since you appear to be an idiot, let me do this as simple as possible.
1- You have established that boss fights account for the 1% of KOTOR game fights where the health bar is not reflective of the actual health/life/closeness to death of the bosses portrayed. In other words, the little red bar thingy going down doesn't mean the Exile is killing them. After all, he has to slash them multiple times for it to go down. Realistically, they would be in pieces.
2- Atris is a boss. Sion is also a boss.
3- Atris demonstrates the validity of your earlier claim; that is, health bars aren't reflective of how close to dying or whether or not they are killed when it comes to boss characters.
4- Again, Sion is also a boss.
5- Therefore, it is foolish to assume that the Exile pwned Sion in lightsaber combat -just because his lifebar went down to nothing-.
This also weakens your earlier claim that the Exile was better than Sion but he could not hack Sion to bits because apparently, while he was better than Sion, he wasn't good enough to hack off any limbs. So he talked him to death.
Yes, that was a stupid assumption you made. Now, you've successfully self-owned yourself. Have a nice day.
Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
Therefore, it is foolish to assume that the Exile pwned Sion in lightsaber combat -just because his lifebar went down to nothing-.
Why is it foolish to assume that? You mentioned earlier that "Health bars are a game mechanic to show the player how close they are to completing the battle", in other words how close they are to defeating the opponent, whether it is temporary or permanent. And because of the fact that The Exile depleted his life force about 5 times at least, in other words defeating him at least five times (as soon as the Exile defeats him, Sion rejuvenates his life force), I think it is safe to logically say that he "pwned" Sion.
Originally posted by Darth Traya
Janus just WTFOMFGpwned you, Kingman...
Tell me one thing that Janus has said about the argument that I have not logically replied to. Is it because he says lame one liners at the end of his argument that geeks like you seem to find hilarious? Or those super cool pictures, interesting to see what you do in your spare time janus.
Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
You are dense, and a waste of my time.
You do realise you are a 23 year old man on a Star Wars forum trying to take the piss out of a 14 year old with petty insults. You're a bit of a loser, huh. I would tell you to get a life, but I see you already have one, one the internet.
Originally posted by kingkman
You do realise you are a 23 year old man on a Star Wars forum trying to take the piss out of a 14 year old with petty insults. You're a bit of a loser, huh. I would tell you to get a life, but I see you already have one, one the internet.
Oh, I do love the petty insults. When in doubt, reroute.
The Commandments of Fanboyism.
I. Thou shalt not adhere to logic if and when it impedes the progress of your biased argument.
II. Thou shalt insult the opposition as a diversionary tactic when thy arguments are proven horribly false.
III. Thou shalt not admit under any circumstances that thou art lost concerning thy argument.
IV. Thou shalt use hyperbole liberally throughout thy argument.
V. Thou shalt not not reply directly to any well-formulated rebuttals or questions.
VI. Thou shalt always retreat back to an earlier defeated point when thy latest point runs aground.
VII. Thou shalt not respect the equally valid sources of thy opposition and should seek to destroy their credibility with extreme prejudice.
VIII. Thou shalt play the victim when thy argument is being destroyed and thy own personal ignorance coming under fire.
IX. Thou shalt exclusively debate topics which deal with thy most favorite, unreproachable characters.
X. Thou art infallible in so much as thou crusade against the opposition with all the lowly weapons of thy craft.
Amen.
Originally posted by kingkman
You do realise you are a 23 year old man on a Star Wars forum trying to take the piss out of a 14 year old with petty insults. You're a bit of a loser, huh. I would tell you to get a life, but I see you already have one, one the internet.
Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
The Commandments of Fanboyism.I. Thou shalt not adhere to logic if and when it impedes the progress of your biased argument.
II. Thou shalt insult the opposition as a diversionary tactic when thy arguments are proven horribly false.
III. Thou shalt not admit under any circumstances that thou art lost concerning thy argument.
IV. Thou shalt use hyperbole liberally throughout thy argument.
V. Thou shalt not not reply directly to any well-formulated rebuttals or questions.
VI. Thou shalt always retreat back to an earlier defeated point when thy latest point runs aground.
VII. Thou shalt not respect the equally valid sources of thy opposition and should seek to destroy their credibility with extreme prejudice.
VIII. Thou shalt play the victim when thy argument is being destroyed and thy own personal ignorance coming under fire.
IX. Thou shalt exclusively debate topics which deal with thy most favorite, unreproachable characters.
X. Thou art infallible in so much as thou crusade against the opposition with all the lowly weapons of thy craft.
Amen.
lol, that is great Janus
Originally posted by Dark Aristokrat
The Commandments of Fanboyism.I. Thou shalt not adhere to logic if and when it impedes the progress of your biased argument.
II. Thou shalt insult the opposition as a diversionary tactic when thy arguments are proven horribly false.
III. Thou shalt not admit under any circumstances that thou art lost concerning thy argument.
IV. Thou shalt use hyperbole liberally throughout thy argument.
V. Thou shalt not not reply directly to any well-formulated rebuttals or questions.
VI. Thou shalt always retreat back to an earlier defeated point when thy latest point runs aground.
VII. Thou shalt not respect the equally valid sources of thy opposition and should seek to destroy their credibility with extreme prejudice.
VIII. Thou shalt play the victim when thy argument is being destroyed and thy own personal ignorance coming under fire.
IX. Thou shalt exclusively debate topics which deal with thy most favorite, unreproachable characters.
X. Thou art infallible in so much as thou crusade against the opposition with all the lowly weapons of thy craft.
Amen.