Silverspider/Dizzle's Team Tounrament: Round 1, Fight 2- DarkCrawler vs. illadelph12

Started by illadelph1220 pages

I know, but I don't feel it would be fair to DarkCrawler if I cut the time of debating in half simply because I have to travel for my job. What if he comes up with a valid rebuttal on Thursday and I'm not here to retort. Would he simply not be able to use it?

It sucks, but I believe in being fair.

If I don't have net access in my hotel room, I'll give DC the win.

No contest, and no regrets.

I'm a fair man.

Originally posted by illadelph12
I know, but I don't feel it would be fair to DarkCrawler if I cut the time of debating in half simply because I have to travel for my job. What if he comes up with a valid rebuttal on Thursday and I'm not here to retort. Would he simply not be able to use it?

It sucks, but I believe in being fair.

If I don't have net access in my hotel room, I'll give DC the win.

No contest, and no regrets.

I'm a fair man.

No! ..... debate for as long as you can.... if it's only till wednesday then just debate until wednesday..... after that leave it up to the judges/voters

it's unfair to everyone else in the tourney if anyone gets a walkover

if DC comes up with arguments when you can't come on then so be it, people will take into account that you can't respond.... maybe he'll be a gent and agree to only one response after your last post

but don't give anyone a walkover.... there was way too much hassle in the drafts for that

Agreed. DC can handle it how he wants, but walkovers should be frowned upon.

Haven't had the time to give this thread the time it deserves yet, what with the duplicating insanity over in the other match. But knowing I have roughly a week now, I'll make some time for this so that my vote (as a judge this week) is an intelligent one. But great stuff so far with what I've browsed through.

Originally posted by Scoobless

it's unfair to everyone else in the tourney if anyone gets a walkover

....coughdeadcough.....someones gonna have to have a swim in the "pool" dont you think?

at this point, i vote for ill. i just believe he has the better team, and gamora and kk alone stand a very good chance at beating DC's team. i am voting now because i won't have access to a computer for a few days.

My flight is Wednesday morning at 7:46a. I get my full iteniary tomorrow morning. I should know if my room has net access by tomorrow afternoon. If I don't I'll just debate through tomorrow night and let it ride, one way or another.

Good luck DC.

Originally posted by Scoobless
because vibranium absorbs vibration ....... and kinetic energy to some degree ..... not other energy types (such as heat)

...... as far as i know

🙂

Sound is, at it's essence, kinetic energy. Heat conduction and convection likewise.

Originally posted by Scoobless
debating until wednesday should be enough for you to get your point across

your second round match probably wont start for about a month.......

if you get through.....

😛

Based on the strength of his rebuttal he definitely should do 😉

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Sound is, at it's essence, kinetic energy. Heat conduction and convection likewise.

If you have queries then research and highlight on panel evidence. Comics dont revolve around science so while what youre saying might be the case in the real world its far from conclusive in this comic based debate.

If I have queries I'll ask the participants of this fight to provide me with information that will convince me of their argument so that I may better judge who I consider the victor. Thanks for the (oh-so-unpatronizing) advice, but I'm all good.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
If I have queries I'll ask the participants of this fight to provide me with information that will convince me of their argument so that I may better judge who I consider the victor. Thanks for the (oh-so-unpatronizing) advice, but I'm all good.

That wasnt patronising in the slightest. You just decided to interpret it in such a way due to the high regard you have for your own intelligence. You have a chip on your shoulder. Lose it. 🙄

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Based on the strength of his rebuttal he definitely should do 😉

Wait...have I done something to you that makes you be like that?

Unless you don't have something else to say then just insult my debating here, leave....

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Wait...have I done something to you that makes you be like that?

Unless you don't have something else to say then just insult my debating here, leave....

How was that insulting youre debating? I said for the time being my vote lies with Ill. Scoobs later questioned whether Ill would make it in to the next round and i said based on the strength of his argument he would. How is that in any way insulting your argument?

If i felt you had the stronger argument then id speak up for you in the same way. Its nothing personal, so dont take it as such.

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
How was that insulting youre debating? I said for the time being my vote lies with Ill. Scoobs later questioned whether Ill would make it in to the next round and i said based on the strength of his argument he would. How is that in any way insulting your argument?

If i felt you had the stronger argument then id speak up for you in the same way. Its nothing personal, so dont take it as such.

So coming up to this thread and basically say that my debating is weak isn't insulting?

Also...

Originally posted by King_Mungi
Your not suppose to post in here unless your asking a question or voting. It helps if other members don't clutter the thread with comments.

Did you have any good reason of commenting the strength of my arguments...?

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
That wasnt patronising in the slightest. You just decided to interpret it in such a way due to the high regard you have for your own intelligence. You have a chip on your shoulder. Lose it. 🙄
I interpret it as patronizing because you come across as patronizing, regardless of whether you may realise it or not.

But this isn't the place to discuss common perception of your manner. 🙂

I'll judge this bout using my own criteria, I don't need your two cents. It doesn't buy much.

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
So coming up to this thread and basically say that my debating is weak isn't insulting?

Also...

I never said your debating is weak. Someone has to win here DC. At this moment in time my vote just happens to lie with Ill as i stated. By saying that am i saying your argument is weak? Not at all. Weaker than Ills? At the moment yes.

As for King M's comment, my first post was a vote so that was cool, my second was a response to Scoobs which was also neither a vote or a question. Youre being too sensitive Dc someone has to lose its nothing personal. Ironically your response to my comment hardly abides by KM's post as well.

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
I never said your debating is weak. Someone has to win here DC. At this moment in time my vote just happens to lie with Ill as i stated. By saying that am i saying your argument is weak? Not at all. Weaker than Ills? At the moment yes.

As for King M's comment, my first post was a vote so that was cool, my second was a response to Scoobs which was also neither a vote or a question. Youre being too sensitive Dc someone has to lose its nothing personal. Ironically your response to my comment hardly abides by KM's post as well.

But I wasn't saying anything about your vote. Your second post had nothing to do with voting or question.

And I aren't being sensetive, just asking why you felt the need to answer Scoob...when he wasn't asking anything.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I interpret it as patronizing because you come across as patronizing, regardless of whether you may realise it or not.

But this isn't the place to discuss common perception of your manner. 🙂

I'll judge this bout using my own criteria, I don't need your two cents. It doesn't buy much.

You interpret it as patronising because of the aforementioned. Nowhere in my post did i put you down, however you took offence to my comments because of how you feel about your own prowess. 🙄

Youre right two cents doesnt buy much but hopefully you'll see it as my contribution towards a much needed sense of humour. 😮

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
But I wasn't saying anything about your vote. Your second post had nothing to do with voting or question.

And I aren't being sensetive, just asking why you felt the need to answer Scoob...when he wasn't asking anything.

If i realised it would be taken by yourself in the way it did then i wouldnt have said anything. Youre right i didnt need to respond to Scoobs and im sorry you took it the way you did. Seriously, its nothing personal. Who knows by the end of the round i may have switched allegiances. Im gonna stop now because im cluttering the thread. 😮

You took it upon yourself to offer unwanted and superfluous "advice" about how I should judge the fight. "GS knows best."?

None of my queries in this thread are directed towards anybody other than the participants.

Ill has yet to convince me that Agent Zero will glow red hot if someone turns up the thermostat, as the nature of vibranium is to absorb vibratory energy such as, but not limited to, sound and store the energy in it's bonds increasing it's hardness at least according to Marvel Directory - the example that vibranium can be destroyed by explosives is explained by Marvel as the vibranium being unable to absorb the "force of the explosion" rather than an inability to absorb heat (A simple scan or incident where someone in vibranium, BP, Agent Zero etc. is burned etc. will suffice, Ill.). Or for that matter that Vertigo can go full-tilt with her powers affecting people 3000 ft away in a 180 degree arc, something I've never seen Vertigo do.

There are points that seem off to me in DC's posts that I also haven't had time to get around to. And I can do so without your pearls of wisdom, thanx.