The Hamas victory, despite it being a democratic one, is ill news...
Just last year Palestine and Israel finally came to something remotely an understanding and made a few steps towards a possible peace.
Sadly the main figures in this positive development are now wiped of the board, Sharon is on the edge of death and the progressive and sort of peace desiring government of Palestine is about to be replaced by the aggressive Hamas. Simultaneous, their cause finds more support in the likes of the increasingly maniacal Iran and the terrorist world.
With Israel as an US ally and the Hamas as a main representative of the anti-western community, this might turn in to the next gulf/ or even world war pretty damn soon.
Originally posted by mechmoggy
That's great WD...always thinking with your stomach! 😉
I just can't reason on an empty belly. 😛
On topic:
There is been protesting and some rioting (as usual) in the Gaza strip over the victory of Hamas.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/01/27/palestinian.election/index.html
Which begs the question....could this cause a split between Palestinians? Or just a small group?
This might be the start of a small rebellion within Palestine, but as the Hamas are by far the most powerful entity, even compared to the regular army, the result will be swift and in Hamas' favour.
The situation in this nation is a prime example of how extremists ideas can exceed the common people's wishes.
Hey, if it was democratically decided, then why wouold a country that's engaging in psuedo-terrorist activities in the middle east to spread democracy have any issues with it?
Could it be that people in this world are not all going to view the presence of a 'democracy' spreading western nation like America, as a good thing? If we want the people of Palestine to stop voting in favor of a terrorist-run government, then we need to hack Israel in half and give one side to them. As it is, they are segregated into a little ghettoesque corner of the country.
Originally posted by PandemoniacIMO autocratic unilateral moves by Ariel Sharon, who refused to even meet with Mahmoud Abbas.... did not amount to a remote understanding.
Just last year Palestine and Israel finally came to something remotely an understanding and made a few steps towards a possible peace.
Originally posted by finti
it would make thing easier if you dont have to worry about the delegates you meet aint got no bomb strapped unto their bodies
Ok, I thin k I got it now. Hamas = Terrorist therefore we won't negotiate with them until they have showed that they are not "evil" terrorists anymore (now that they actuially are then leaders of a democratic government would their attacks now be considered an act of war?) -> they can only show that they are not terrorists if they don't attack us when we negotiate with them -> we won't give them a chance.
Or is it that you are saying that all terrorist attacks have to cease before the Hamas are allowed to speak to the glorious US? Kind of hard to achieve isn't it. Are you sure they are actually able to tell everyone what to do and what not?
Or is it that you are saying that all terrorist attacks have to cease before the Hamas are allowed to speak to the glorious US?I think you need to get more into what was really said and why, Hamas has had an agenda where as the only way to deal with Israel is to blow them up. They also have glorified and recruited suicide bombers among young Palestinians. They dont care if they attack innocent people as long as it is for their cause.
Hamas = Terrorist therefore we won't negotiate with them until they have showed that they are not "evil" terrorists anymore
Are you sure they are actually able to tell everyone what to do and what not?as Hamas and for controlling their own members yes they need to or else they wont have any credibility at all.
Originally posted by fintiAside from bad PR, how much does the Israeli Administration really care about the innocent people in the Palestinian territories though?
They dont care if they attack innocent people as long as it is for their cause.
Originally posted by finti...are terrorists therefore we do not negotiate with them, therefore they use violence as a political tool therefore they are terrorists, therefore we do not negotiate with them, therefore they use violence as a political tool, therefore they...
US have always had the policy to not to negotiate with terrorists and it aint gonna change now. And there are now doubts wiht the ways Hamas have presentd themselves in the past they aint nothing but a bunch of terrorists
The U.S. deals with regimes as "illustrious" as that of Uzbekistan....
Aside from bad PR, how much does the Israeli Administration really care about the innocent people in the Palestinian territories though?I agree on that but that doesnt make it allright for Hamas to allow their memebres to blow up innocent, if they teargeted military instalations then at least they would look like freedom fighters, but they dont they target innocent people all the time and then they hide themselves among the innocent of their own
The U.S. deals with regimes as "illustrious" as that of Uzbekistanand the Uzbegi government blew up a bus when? the Uzbeki government blew up a market place, a dicsco, a shopping mall when?
Originally posted by fintiThe Uzbek government boils people to death...
and the Uzbegi government blew up a bus when? the Uzbeki government blew up a market place, a dicsco, a shopping mall when?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,963497,00.html
I will remind people that Hitler's Government was elected.
Whilst being elected is one important prerequisite for good government that can be dealth with, it is NOT an all-encompassing concept that warrants acceptance by the international community.
Hamas is a vicious and evil organisation that is condemned as a terrorist group by both US and EU; there is no question of any one agenda here, paitning them out simply because they are opponents. Hamas IS evil, pure and simple.
If they do not renounce violence immediately, and so no give up their recently re-stated policy that Israel has no right to exist, then it is not only the right but also the moral duty of other nations to shun them, and perform actions like cutting off funding.
You do not accept such obviously evil regimes simply on the basis of an election. There are other areas to consider.