Anakin Skywalker Vs Mace Windu

Started by kamikz8 pages

1. Akbar, Kaithen means when Anakin and Padme are looking out the windows from different buildings in Courascant. You can quietly hear Palpatine's voice whisper in his head, but Palpatine is several buildings away. He also says something that he has never said before.... (Not the words that Kaithen said, but something else. Kaithen you got the words mixed up).

2. Here he is talking about when Sidious is using lightning against Mace when Anakin has entered. Exactly before Sidious stops using lightning, Mace gets hit by lightning on his left hand and drops it from the saber. Just at that moment, Sidious stops using lightning. Kaithen means that because Palpatine wasn't really weak, he could have continued firing lightning at that moment, and Mace with one hand would not be able to parry it...

There did that explain it?

Windu..without a doubt. 😐

Originally posted by overlord
Hahaha, the fight started out stupid, they slashed a bit and began to babble again, Anakin just pointed his sword to the ground when Dooku blocked Obi Wan. They talked and went further with apperantly testing each other. (I heard they even used other dueling styles or something but who cares)

Dude. If you want to discuss swordfights with me please get yourself some knowledge about swordfighting instead of simply assuming that swordfighters won't fight serious from the first strike to the last. There is this funny moment in the fight where Anakin gives Dooku a two-handed swing and Obi-Wan is attackin him in the same moment and he blocks them with his blade horizontally above his head while handling his lightsaber one-handed.


Dooku retaliates and starts fighting serious and punishes them both, yes this is a sign of superiority (something wich may have impressed you a bit too much) but it was only for a short moment.
Then Anakin began fighting seriously with Shienn and they began fighting at a good way.

Anakin gives Dooku two-handed swings (form V) throughout the entire fight but suddenly he decides to...well...use more two-handed strikes and the very same form and overpowers him ? While we have seen Dooku blocking Anakin and Obi-Wan and once and toss them through the room with his force powers ?

Use some common sense. If Dooku can control Obi-Wan and Anakin at once why would he not be able to control Anakin alone. Because Anakin wasn't fighting serious before ? That's laughable. We see Anakin and Obi-Wan having quite some problems with Asajj Ventress quite close before ROTS when they were fighting serious - why shouldn't they have problems with Dooku who is far more powerful and a far better duellist then Asajj ?


Awww.. You don't believe it right? And you are talking about the impressive retaliation of Count Dooku again? Well, Anakin and Obi Wan learned a hell of a lot more and the last time they fought was way different. I assume they thought they could take him out, no problem. They didn't know he was also not fighting seriously at the beginning up until he punishes them and especially Obi Wan.
But you may continue your believes that they weren't cocky (and by that I mean Kenobi) and they really gave their best immediately. I will just ignore you in that case.

Again: You're talking about three trained warriors here. You don't enter swordfights and "get cocky" after decades of training. You don't go into a fight without fighting seriously. That might happen in some nice sparring session with toy sabers but it doesn't happen in a serious confrontation in the middle of a space-battle in a full scale war.

They were all fighting serious and Dooku took Obi-Wan out of the fight, then he taunted Anakin to use (instead of fight or control) his anger and has Anakin disarming him with a surprise action. That's it. And if Dooku wasn't allowed to kill Anakin (see the ROTS novel and the audio commentary where Lucas mentions that this scene should show that Sith Apprentices can recruit Jedi too), then he simply wasn't able to go all out against Anakin.


At least I don't have to constantly mention that I am laughing my ass off behind my computer, idiot.

No. You don't have because you'd rather cry because of getting your pretty assertions exterminated every single post, right ?


WOWZERS!! You discovered the whole secret!! Not that I am a dumbass like you all but at least the one I am defending indeed defeated the one you are all defending. Go cry some more and make up some more theories to why Dooku didn't lost fair and square.

No. You aren't a "dumbass like we all". You are the King of Idiocy here. I'm making things up ? You mean like "Hey. We have three trained warrior entering a serious fight here. First they get cocky, then they try to test their opponent, not fighting serious until one of them decides to wipe the floor with his 2 opponents. And just after this the one opponent left decides that this might be the right moment to use everything he can against his enemy. This always happens in a 2vs1. Nobody fights seriously before the single person managed to take one of the other team out to make the fight at least look fair". That's what you try to tell us ? Uh-hu. This is especially nice against directs statements in the novel and from Lucas in the commentary - but nevermind. You must be right of course.


If you start screaming that Dooku could always win because he has two hands in a lightning fast duel then you should ask yourself why Dooku and Sidious don't win every duel by using force lightning. Oh yeah, your theory is that they ALWAYS hold back.. Hmm.. I don't think I believe much of that crap..

What ? I did say that I don't believe that Anakin would win against Dooku everytime because Dooku was not using his force powers. Did you ever develop the idea that if Dooku can force choke Obi-Wan out of a duel situation without effort and we've seen Anakin stalemating Obi-Wan in their force push contest on Mustafar that he should be able to do the same thing to Anakin ? No...of course not.
The lightning was just another example.


Ahh.. All that crap about Yoda and Dooku having beaten Mace some time. I didn't saw them do it in ROTS and frankly, I don't care.. All I know is that Mace did some way more impressive sabering than Dooku.

He did ? Watch Dooku vs Yoda and Dooku vs Anakin and Kenobi in AotC and RotS and then tell me that Mace looked as if he did the more impressive sabering. He and Sidious moved so freaking slow in their fight it's hilarious.


About force sensitivity (oh, the force is strong in this one!), sure it means nothing anymore to you, doesn't it? That suits you fine in this argument.
So Anakin didn't manage to get the upper hand on Obi Wan, I say he should've stayed calm, then he'd stand a chance. But who cares, the circumstances in the Dooku/Anakin fight are way different. And what is your definition of power in this "Dooku is most powerful they evar saw!!11!!11" line?

What the...
Dooku took out Obi-Wan with a force TK attack. Dooku > Obi-Wan.
Anakin and Obi-Wan stalemated when trying to use force TK against each other. Anakin = Obi-Wan.
Can that mean that Dooku could do the same to Anakin ? Yes.

The point is that Anakin's force sensitivity means jack shit because he's lacking control and training. He couldn't overcome somebody with a far lesser force sensitivity or potential then Dooku because the guy had 25 years of training advantage. How would he be able to overcome somebody who had 70 years of training advantage and more force powers + aggressive force powers like Dooku in a sheer force contest. Exactly: He can't because he misses the control.


Is that your answer to that Dooku never came up with a whole new fighting style? Don't bother anymore in that case. You aren't forced to say something to every sentance I make. Just make it relevant. Mace Windu completed that f*cking Vaapad and even managed to get Sidious beat who is by his own right the master of Dooku. Just let it go, people became better than Dooku, you aren't losing sleep over this fact I hope?

I hope that you aren't losing sleep over the fact that you can't proof Mace Windu is more powerful or a better swordsmen then Dooku. Dooku didn't have any need to develop an own style since his was the "ultimate refinement of lightsaber to lightsaber combat" while Mace style doesn't focus on this one single situation of fighting (lightsaber vs lightsaber) but created a more versatile form.
That doesn't make him stronger in lightsaber vs lightsaber combat - in fact we have seen that he wasn't able to defeat Dooku when he already used this style before. So what do you want ? The apprentice doesn't have to be a lesser skilled lightsaber combatant than his master just because he's the apprentice. See Anakin and Obi-Wan - even in AotC Anakin gave Dooku more trouble than Obi-Wan did before. And another theory getting destroyed. Ups.


I suppose they spent training together in cool EU BS right until ROTS and Mace finally completing the form, otherwise what you are telling me is mighty irrelevent.

Yes. Of course. Because Windu will suddenly completely change the style that he's using for almost 3 decades in 13 years. And we still know that Dooku was able to beat Mace why we have no proof that Mace would be able to defeat Dooku. So what do you want ? Playing the pathetic Dooku hater ?


At least I go by the movies instead of level this and that and goku powerlevel 9. But yes, Mace can probably overcome Dooku aswell. The things Dooku showed in ROTS weren't so impressive unfortunately.

You go by what ? You go by your own interpretation of the movies lacking any knowledge of swordfights, common sense and combat in general. And if you want to go by the movies Dooku was much more impressive (movement, speed) compared to Mace.


Hey, maybe Sidious was overcome just because of the unknown new way of dueling! Who knows! Mace his reaction skills were pretty fine though to beat the lord of the sith, if Anakin already could surprise Dooku, I am sure Mace can aswell. Who cares anyway..

You care as you were starting this pointless argument, correct ?

...continue...


Yeah yeah, they supposedly have beaten Mace in the past. He's a prodigy or something or a fast learner, who cares.. He just improved massively for some reason wich may be a bit contradictory to some EU material or something, who cares.. He showed he could beat Sidious in a fair duel and Sidious is no easy opponent. You just may have to consider that Mace indeed came to the level of Yoda or something.. Would this upset you?

LOL. Come back to me when you have learned to discuss a topic and give me some arguments. Saying "No matter what the in universe facts say, my opinion must be right" is no debating. Sorry to tell you.


What in the world would Lucas have to do or film to convince people that Dooku and Sidious were beaten in a duel! I don't think any fight is clear enough for most of you. It is for me though.. But I agree, Sidious could probably win in a rematch just like Dooku could. Lightsabers aren't really that predictable but just what are you trying to say with this?

I'm saying that you can't use the outcome of fights as they happened in the movie in certain situations with surprise elements (for the people who lost) to determine the outcome of other fights involving those persons with 100 % certainty if you change the situation.

If Mace and Sidious would go and fight in the Senate chamber - Mace might very likely use. If you replace Mace with Yoda in the scene where Mace fought Sidious - Yoda might clearly win this.


Let's get back to the topic.. Can Anakin beat Mace Windu? You somehow seem to place mace under Dooku and Yoda so are you saying Anakin can do it? I for one think Mace is better than Anakin (and Dooku aswell by the way) so I have made my points for this topic.

Now what ?
I place Anakin under Yoda, Dooku and Mace because he lacks experience, force control and the clear state of mind needed in a battle - hence Mace will beat him.

Originally posted by kamikz
1. Akbar, Kaithen means when Anakin and Padme are looking out the windows from different buildings in Courascant. You can quietly hear Palpatine's voice whisper in his head, but Palpatine is several buildings away. He also says something that he has never said before.... (Not the words that Kaithen said, but something else. Kaithen you got the words mixed up).

2. Here he is talking about when Sidious is using lightning against Mace when Anakin has entered. Exactly before Sidious stops using lightning, Mace gets hit by lightning on his left hand and drops it from the saber. Just at that moment, Sidious stops using lightning. Kaithen means that because Palpatine wasn't really weak, he could have continued firing lightning at that moment, and Mace with one hand would not be able to parry it...

There did that explain it?

1.) He sure did maybe thats the problem then.

2.) Well, you explain it much better than he did. I agree, that Sidious was definetly faking the part with lightning. I dont believe he used all the power he had, but the guy was frying up from all of the reflected energy. He could have died if he dident stop.

Which is why Anakin outdueled and killed Dooku, right? Anakin is placed on their terms in terms of dueling

Mace wins, too much experiance AND doesn't have Dooku's weakness of being old and weak (mace is probably a lot stronger physically than Anakin)

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Which is why Anakin outdueled and killed Dooku, right?

But Anakin did not outduel Dooku. He did not cut his hands off while they were engaged in blade to blade combat (as Dooku had done to him). He only cut Dooku's hands off after he grabbed Dooku's arms, immobilizing his lightsaber. That was the point the duel finished. Anakin was about 60 years younger than Dooku, so obviously the physically stronger man. It was when Anakin had physically overpowered Dooku that he then cut off his hands, and then killed him, when he was kneeling on the floor, unable to mount any defence. That does not constitute 'outduelling him', as he did not do so while they were still 'clashing blades'.

Originally posted by Admiral Akbar
1.) He sure did maybe thats the problem then.

2.) Well, you explain it much better than he did. I agree, that Sidious was definetly faking the part with lightning. I dont believe he used all the power he had, but the guy was frying up from all of the reflected energy. He could have died if he dident stop.

Hmm yeah. But we are talking seconds here, Mace would loose all balance with one hand plus he would only have half of the strenght to hold the lightning. He would be overwhealmed at once. And Sidious really didn't seem wounded at all, the lightning only melted his "mask" as far as I know of, and he didn't seem to get tired or anything. I belive he could have continued for at least 10 seconds.

And Anakin didn't overpower Dooku completely? I guess Mace didn't beat Sidious in combat either since he threw a kick

Originally posted by Lightsnake
And Anakin didn't overpower Dooku completely?

Yes, he did physically overpower him Dooku completely. That is not the same however, as outduelling him.

I guess Mace didn't beat Sidious in combat either since he threw a kick [/B]

A kick is a blow used in combat, so yes, Mace did beat Palpatine in combat.

No, actually it's using your advantage and style.

Grabbing someone is a combat move, so Dooku was beaten in combat

First, let me say that it is people like you, Pyro Tyrannus, and Rampant Ox that totally make me hate the almighty Count Dooku. You all completely ruin the character with your "Dooku owns alalll`~:~```" campaigns.

Yes, he did physically overpower him Dooku completely. That is not the same however, as outduelling him.

Rofl. . .

A kick is a blow used in combat, so yes, Mace did beat Palpatine in combat.

ROFL!!!!

ROFL!!!!

Wait, wait, wait . . . so, Anakin grabbing Dooku was cheating, but Mace kicking Palpatine in the face wasn't?

LOLOLOL.

This is what you call "double-standards".

Erm . . . no. By YOUR logic, Mace didn't do it fairly. He didn't outmaneuver Palpatine with his weapon - therefore, Mace didn't really win, and who is superior is really inconclusive, because Mace kicked him.

Yup.

The amazing borborad:
Dude. If you want to discuss swordfights with me please get yourself some knowledge about swordfighting instead of simply assuming that swordfighters won't fight serious from the first strike to the last. There is this funny moment in the fight where Anakin gives Dooku a two-handed swing and Obi-Wan is attackin him in the same moment and he blocks them with his blade horizontally above his head while handling his lightsaber one-handed.

Point being? They were slashing around a bit and they just stop attacking suddenly to let Dooku speak. It's not as if they immediately launched everything they got.
Anakin gives Dooku two-handed swings (form V) throughout the entire fight but suddenly he decides to...well...use more two-handed strikes and the very same form and overpowers him ? While we have seen Dooku blocking Anakin and Obi-Wan and once and toss them through the room with his force powers ?

Use some common sense. If Dooku can control Obi-Wan and Anakin at once why would he not be able to control Anakin alone. Because Anakin wasn't fighting serious before ? That's laughable. We see Anakin and Obi-Wan having quite some problems with Asajj Ventress quite close before ROTS when they were fighting serious - why shouldn't they have problems with Dooku who is far more powerful and a far better duellist then Asajj ?


Just hear yourself "That's laughable!!" By the way, I don't care about clone war stuff that was made later than the movies. Maybe he couldn't control Anakin because he just couldn't as in he wasn't good enough. (oh! I said it, what a sly devil I am!)

Again: You're talking about three trained warriors here. You don't enter swordfights and "get cocky" after decades of training. You don't go into a fight without fighting seriously. That might happen in some nice sparring session with toy sabers but it doesn't happen in a serious confrontation in the middle of a space-battle in a full scale war.

They were all fighting serious and Dooku took Obi-Wan out of the fight, then he taunted Anakin to use (instead of fight or control) his anger and has Anakin disarming him with a surprise action. That's it. And if Dooku wasn't allowed to kill Anakin (see the ROTS novel and the audio commentary where Lucas mentions that this scene should show that Sith Apprentices can recruit Jedi too), then he simply wasn't able to go all out against Anakin.


Oh, just hear Obi Wan say "Like whatever dude, sith are our specialty!!", they thought they improved enough to handle Dooku as if their victory was for sure.
And no, they didn't immediately get serious, they began, stopped, talked, went further on playing a bit (this is all doesn't last long) and Dooku punishes the fools. What we then see is Anakin and Dooku going all out. If holding back includes stop focusing on your opponent's actions and minimalizing your defenses then you are right about all of this.
I think it's very heroic that you tell yourself that but you don't really come across convincing here.
No. You don't have because you'd rather cry because of getting your pretty assertions exterminated every single post, right ?

Wow! You're like totally right, go celebrate! I tend to cry easily, don't I.
*Laughing the bumm off*
No. You aren't a "dumbass like we all". You are the King of Idiocy here. I'm making things up ? You mean like "Hey. We have three trained warrior entering a serious fight here. First they get cocky, then they try to test their opponent, not fighting serious until one of them decides to wipe the floor with his 2 opponents. And just after this the one opponent left decides that this might be the right moment to use everything he can against his enemy. This always happens in a 2vs1. Nobody fights seriously before the single person managed to take one of the other team out to make the fight at least look fair". That's what you try to tell us ? Uh-hu. This is especially nice against directs statements in the novel and from Lucas in the commentary - but nevermind. You must be right of course.

Are you playing games here? All your comments sounds so retarded.. King of idiocy after I state that at least I defend the one who has actually won? Go downstairs and ask your mom if that makes sense.
You keep forgetting that the beginning of the fight were they just get started is over pretty soon, you can prolongue that scene and tell yourself "OMG, he owned those suckers" but I frankly don't care. They mess around and talk a bit in the beginning and that is over soon, get over it.
What ? I did say that I don't believe that Anakin would win against Dooku everytime because Dooku was not using his force powers. Did you ever develop the idea that if Dooku can force choke Obi-Wan out of a duel situation without effort and we've seen Anakin stalemating Obi-Wan in their force push contest on Mustafar that he should be able to do the same thing to Anakin ? No...of course not.
The lightning was just another example.

Wow, that totally debased my response! Now, Dooku and Sidious still didn't use mighty powers to win every time they fought, now did they? Maybe because you have to wait for the right time? No, of course not, those mighty powers are insta-winners.
He did ? Watch Dooku vs Yoda and Dooku vs Anakin and Kenobi in AotC and RotS and then tell me that Mace looked as if he did the more impressive sabering. He and Sidious moved so freaking slow in their fight it's hilarious.

Impressive as in defeating Darth Sidious. That dumbass ataru fight in AotC wasn't impressive at all, Yoda made such useless moves and it basically didn't look practical or effective at all. Put Mace in that position and he'd hold off the green dwarve aswell.
And go watch ROTS again, it's actually a pretty fast fight until they back off, saberlock and switch to another scene. After we return, we see a lame ass ataru fight with some backflips and wide swings. We don't see much of what happens next (the camera moves in to their faces) but it's probably fast enough again.
Of course you tend to exagurate to what suits your case but I think you are bullshitting me.
What the...
Dooku took out Obi-Wan with a force TK attack. Dooku > Obi-Wan.
Anakin and Obi-Wan stalemated when trying to use force TK against each other. Anakin = Obi-Wan.
Can that mean that Dooku could do the same to Anakin ? Yes.

The point is that Anakin's force sensitivity means jack shit because he's lacking control and training. He couldn't overcome somebody with a far lesser force sensitivity or potential then Dooku because the guy had 25 years of training advantage. How would he be able to overcome somebody who had 70 years of training advantage and more force powers + aggressive force powers like Dooku in a sheer force contest. Exactly: He can't because he misses the control.


Oh yeah! Dooku did major awesome force tk bs so dooku > obi wan, cool! And Anakin lost focus and shit and is force tk anakin = obi! Wow, that means so little that it hurts. Dooku blasted off Obi Wan when he got the oppurtunity, please stop talking about force tk math from now on.
I'm talking reaction skills, not who has the more force powers such as lightning. Dooku could've had more experience and have been a master at some form, Anakin clearly had better reaction skills or whatever you may call it due to his being more in tune with the force. Anakin managed to outmanouver the count!
I hope that you aren't losing sleep over the fact that you can't proof Mace Windu is more powerful or a better swordsmen then Dooku. Dooku didn't have any need to develop an own style since his was the "ultimate refinement of lightsaber to lightsaber combat" while Mace style doesn't focus on this one single situation of fighting (lightsaber vs lightsaber) but created a more versatile form.
That doesn't make him stronger in lightsaber vs lightsaber combat - in fact we have seen that he wasn't able to defeat Dooku when he already used this style before. So what do you want ? The apprentice doesn't have to be a lesser skilled lightsaber combatant than his master just because he's the apprentice. See Anakin and Obi-Wan - even in AotC Anakin gave Dooku more trouble than Obi-Wan did before. And another theory getting destroyed. Ups.

Woah! Awesome comeback! You hope I don't lose sleep over that you I can't convince you! Well don't worry. I'm saying that the completion of Mace's vaapad was more important than the few new tricks Dooku learned. The movie kind of makes it clear. But what pointless stuff do you have to tell now? Dooku could be better in fighting than Sidious? Well, I don't see a brat just surprising Sidious who defeated multiple jedi masters in a mere matter of seconds.
So no, you don't destroy a theory. I think it's pretty logical that Dooku just never reached the level of Sidious by looking at the movie. Mace however did show that he could keep up with people like Sidious and Yoda.

Why are you arguing so desperately about this anyway? Do you honestly believe that Dooku is much better than what was shown and that Mace isn't as good as was shown in the movie? I don't think you actually can come up with good arguments to support this theory. Sorry, you just don't come across convincing..

Yes. Of course. Because Windu will suddenly completely change the style that he's using for almost 3 decades in 13 years. And we still know that Dooku was able to beat Mace why we have no proof that Mace would be able to defeat Dooku. So what do you want ? Playing the pathetic Dooku hater ?

Even if I hated Dooku for some strange reason, would that be pathetic? And you don't think fighting with an incomplete form is just not as effective as it could be?

You go by what ? You go by your own interpretation of the movies lacking any knowledge of swordfights, common sense and combat in general. And if you want to go by the movies Dooku was much more impressive (movement, speed) compared to Mace.

Hahaha!! I lack knowledge of swordfights? You believe opponents always immediately fly off full out in battle against each other! Why am I suddenly the one who is the fool!
But I guess you are just too full of pride to admit that Dooku didn't show impressive victories and that Mace only had one fight shown in the whole saga to look at.
But no, I do go by the movies instead of crazy interpretations. You accuse me of doing the same as you but you are wrong. I've seen a brat outmanouver Dooku who has still only managed to stay alive and I've seen Mace outduel Dooku's teacher.
You care as you were starting this pointless argument, correct ?

Uhmm.. No, you got all crazy and came by with enormous explanations for your theories for every sentance I said. I never asked for this much bullshit. This is your life, not mine.
LOL. Come back to me when you have learned to discuss a topic and give me some arguments. Saying "No matter what the in universe facts say, my opinion must be right" is no debating. Sorry to tell you.

This is what you say when I say that mace perhaps was a quick learner? And that his completion of Vaapad may have been the key to coming near the level of Yoda and Sidious? You sir are a genuine fool.
Pretty cool that you had to state that you were laughing out loud in the air because of this aswell. Maybe you're not one hundred percent..
I'm saying that you can't use the outcome of fights as they happened in the movie in certain situations with surprise elements (for the people who lost) to determine the outcome of other fights involving those persons with 100 % certainty if you change the situation.

If Mace and Sidious would go and fight in the Senate chamber - Mace might very likely use. If you replace Mace with Yoda in the scene where Mace fought Sidious - Yoda might clearly win this.


And I say that if I see Dooku get outmanouvered by Anakin, I say that my regard for Dooku's fighting abilities go a little bit down. And when I see Mace Windu defeat Yoda in a normal fighting surrounding, he goes up for me even though Yoda could've probably done the same thing. Again: What are you trying to say?
Now what ?
I place Anakin under Yoda, Dooku and Mace because he lacks experience, force control and the clear state of mind needed in a battle - hence Mace will beat him.

Now what!!
And I shift Dooku and Anakin around in wich place of the order you have them because I'm not a hopeless dreamer so then the thread is decided for us two, isn't it?
I don't get why you always have such a hard time explaining your thoughts and shit that you have to use so much text, but I guess that is because english isn't your native toungue or something.. But try in the future to write things down mentally and give a short but powerful presentation of your thoughts because I am stuck explaining stuff to you for a f*cking hour and although you may seem to think this is normal, I think it's a goddamn waste of my time.
Thank you.

Rofl . . .

Overlord, Nai's an exceptional debator - but you shouldn't argue with him about Yoda or Dooku. Those are touchy subjects for him. Hell, this is the guy who argued that Count Dooku was superior to Palpatine in the Force.

Originally posted by overlord
Hahaha!! I lack knowledge of swordfights? You believe opponents always immediately fly off full out in battle against each other! Why am I suddenly the one who is the fool!

No. I said you won't see a team of two people and trained warriors getting cocky and three trained warriors in a 2 vs 1 situation not fighting serious - until one of the pair gets manhandled. That's so stupid that if stupidity hurts you should lie on the ground and cry the entire day.
And especially outright offensive fighters like Anakin wouldn't do that. Obi-Wan maybe. Dooku possibly. But Anakin ?


But I guess you are just too full of pride to admit that Dooku didn't show impressive victories and that Mace only had one fight shown in the whole saga to look at.
But no, I do go by the movies instead of crazy interpretations. You accuse me of doing the same as you but you are wrong. I've seen a brat outmanouver Dooku who has still only managed to stay alive and I've seen Mace outduel Dooku's teacher.

As it seems you go by the movies only and ignore the EU.

Dooku:
- leveled Obi-Wan and Anakin in AotC
- wrecked Obi-Wan in ROTS
- tooled Asajj Ventress twice (force lightning, 10 second swordfight)
- trained Grievous and defeated him several times (and the dude killed how many Jedi ?)
- floored Sora Bulq
- and neither Mace nor Yoda were able to stop him in direct confrontation (although he escaped both times)

Mace:
- outduelled Sidious
- leveled Grievous
- defeated Depa Billaba
- defeated Kar Vastor (at least this wasn't done in melee combat)
- defeated Asajj Ventress
- killed Jango Fett

But of course. Those two can't be equal. Especially since Dooku defeated Jedi Masters and Council Members in lightsaber combat without using the force in any way (which is pretty impressive), was the Order's leading instructor and principal for advanced lightsaber combat and we know that he did beat Mace before.


This is what you say when I say that mace perhaps was a quick learner? And that his completion of Vaapad may have been the key to coming near the level of Yoda and Sidious? You sir are a genuine fool.
Pretty cool that you had to state that you were laughing out loud in the air because of this aswell. Maybe you're not one hundred percent..

It's getting hilarious, noob. I know that Mace was a quick learner because I stated it often enough myself. The point is that Dooku still had 30 years of training advantage and was one of two people that were ever able to defeat Mace Windu - because he was an outstanding duellist and force user on his own. As Jocasta Nu said:"He was one of the most brilliant Jedi I've ever had the privilege of knowing."


And I say that if I see Dooku get outmanouvered by Anakin, I say that my regard for Dooku's fighting abilities go a little bit down. And when I see Mace Windu defeat Yoda in a normal fighting surrounding, he goes up for me even though Yoda could've probably done the same thing. Again: What are you trying to say?

No...what you keep stating here is that Mace will definetly defeat Dooku in lightsaber combat without having any proof to say so. There is nothing to compare them. We never see them duelling until there is a victor. We never see Mace fight Yoda. We never see Dooku fight Sidious. We never see Mace fight Anakin.
And we can judge them from opponents they both faced (Grievous, Asajj) since Dooku controlled the first and faced Asajj when she was weaker then when Windu faced her. Do you see the problem now ?


Now what!!
And I shift Dooku and Anakin around in wich place of the order you have them because I'm not a hopeless dreamer so then the thread is decided for us two, isn't it?

Is this really so hard to understand ? You place Anakin above Dooku because he managed to surprise and thereby defeat Dooku once when all other instances say that Dooku was still superior to Anakin.

That's like saying Anakin must be superior to Sidious because he did manage to cut Mace hand off and Sidious didn't. Or he must be superior to Yoda because of that.


I don't get why you always have such a hard time explaining your thoughts and shit that you have to use so much text, but I guess that is because english isn't your native toungue or something.. But try in the future to write things down mentally and give a short but powerful presentation of your thoughts because I am stuck explaining stuff to you for a f*cking hour and although you may seem to think this is normal, I think it's a goddamn waste of my time.
Thank you.

Because I have to get them into your brain properly and you seem inable to just read what I'm writing and think two seconds before replying. Of course...I can use four letter words in every sentence and call that "powerful presentation" and think I'm doing a nice job in debating like you do. Not my style. If you don't "waste your time" simply don't read my post. That's so damn easy that even you should be able to figure this out.

@Escape:


Overlord, Nai's an exceptional debator - but you shouldn't argue with him about Yoda or Dooku. Those are touchy subjects for him. Hell, this is the guy who argued that Count Dooku was superior to Palpatine in the Force.

Oh come on, Escape. I said that Dooku might have more force mastery (especially light side techniques) for the single reason that he's 20 years older and hat a 70 year Jedi training advantage on Sidious and he was one of the most powerful individuals the order had seen in the last centuries.

Oh by the way. Since you prefer "powerful" and short presentations:

So. Those people aren't fighting serious while Dooku almost easily blocks them both at once with only one hand on his blade ? Nice that you told me...won't have been able to develop such an opinion seeing this picture... 🙄

ROTS novel explanation: They held back to trick him at the start.

And oh, come on...Dooku having more force mastery than mr "Embraced the Dark Side from birth?"

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Grabbing someone is a combat move, so Dooku was beaten in combat

Yes. He was not however, beaten in a duel, which people seem to insist that he was.