Exar Kun vs NJO Luke and DE Sidious

How can you even argue that Kun wins?

Sometimes I wonder if Carthage is necessary evil.

It's threads like these that make me realise the KMC of today isn't so bad. 🙂

In fairness, the pre-'10 era on pretty much all boards was like this. We had Traya beating Yoda/Sidious in the Force, Vrook being assumed to be Mace's equal because of his position on the Council (and Vandar being assumed to be Yoda's equal for the same reason), Obi-Wan being fodder, and even Sion beating the likes of Maul with ease just because he's from the OR era.

Sometimes the OR era gets mocked pretty hard these days, but when you think about it, it's kind of deserved, given the unabashed fanwanking of those early days.

Exar Kun force choked trainees and paralyzed a bunch of non force sensitives, even though the Jedi were entirely unharmed. Feats for Luke or Sidious that compare to siphoning off nexus energies/the temple/students and killing Odan Urr?

Exar can choke Sidious out

Originally posted by SunRazer
In fairness, the pre-'10 era on pretty much all boards was like this. We had Traya beating Yoda/Sidious in the Force, Vrook being assumed to be Mace's equal because of his position on the Council (and Vandar being assumed to be Yoda's equal for the same reason), Obi-Wan being fodder, and even Sion beating the likes of Maul with ease just because he's from the OR era.

Sometimes the OR era gets mocked pretty hard these days, but when you think about it, it's kind of deserved, given the unabashed fanwanking of those early days.

Oh, and of course, back then, Bane was widely regarded to be Sidious's better. Almost nobody took any of the "most powerful" quotes into consideration - actually, it seems like most people didn't even know about them.

Obviously the team wins, but nice analysis of the senate there.

The logic that feats don't matter makes no sense to mean, but they're using feats to try and say why Kun>Luke like wtf.