Actually if you really read the comic carefully and examine it well, you will see that he witnesses the funeral and the events that take place, including Ragnos passing, but this does not necessarily mean that he FELT his passing. It would be kind of like if Yoda witnesses the duel between Ben Kenobi and Darth Vader on the death star. He would have witnessed the whole duel, he would have witnesses Ben Kenobi dying, but he wouldn't have necessarily felt his death through the force.
Originally posted by tdtd
I don't understand what you are saying. If he doesn't physically see something then he obviously both feels it and sees it in his dreams. He saw and more importantly felt the passing of Ragnos, which caused him to wake up from his nightmare.
Well technically he saw it as a vision through his dream and did not feel Ragnos passing through the force.
That's not actually right. You are saying that through the force he felt Ragnos' spirit fade away. The force actually showed him in his dream (through a vision) the events in the comic that proceeded Odun Urr waking up from his dream/force vision. That is basically what happened. He did not feel Ragnos' spirit fading away through the force.
tdtd, the skywalkers had the highest potential post Ruusan. Exar Kun, died half the age of DN Luke, it is logical to assume Kun had not achieved his full potential, nor full power, all Jedi and Sith, achieve their full power, as they age and gain experience, after their peak, their age gradually wears away their force potential, however Kun has displayed extraordinary powers, for a young Dark Lord, while the same Luke at the same age, displayed impressive skills, but none that equal Kun
Just like Sidious was revived, into a clone and moreso a younger body, he became much more powerful than his ROTJ counterpart. If Kun was the be revived, it can easily be concluded that he would be much more powerful than his former self, however since there is no proof of this, it cannot be counted more than speculation
However, you have effectively played feat wars with IKC, Kun drained the entire race of the Massassi, Luke cut down hundreds of Vong, including their leader. But draining thousands of lives, and causing their demise, is far more impressive than wielding a saber and cutting down Vong, whom were more powerful than your average soldier. Remeber Kun also defeated dark monsters, that were huge and created from Sith Alchemy, yet Kun's force powers, that came out as controlled beams out of the amulet were powerful enough to literally cut the Dark side monsters into pieces.
DN Luke has displayed impressive force abilities, at his full potential.
Exar Kun has displayed just as impressive abilities, during his younger age
Logic dictates that, Kun having reached the age of DN Luke, would be far more powerful than any incarntion of Luke.
Consider one last thing, tdtd, Kun had one comic written about him, Luke has almost 50 books, so for those who say that Luke has done more, he has only merely a full display of his power, unlike Kun who has very few feats to name, although impressive, so by bringing into the fight, so many feats, you have effectively displayed all of Luke's power, but you haven't proved that Kun is inferior to Luke.
Nor has anyone proved vice versa. Again I use the logic that Luke did things Sadow did, although not to the full degree, without a meditation sphere and an amulet, while Kun had an amulet. And the vong could take on the Jedi, especially the Supreme Overlord who could take on many Jedi at once, so I fail to see how you can call them better than average soldiers. And the fact that he cut down an army of Vong with just his saber is far more impressive than Kun using his trusty amulet to blast things. I agree with you that Luke was older, but we do not know how old Kun was exactly, and we do know Luke accomplished far more and showed more impressive force powers without the use of any tools like amulets and sith magic.
Originally posted by w00t2112
tdtd, the skywalkers had the highest potential post Ruusan. Exar Kun, died half the age of DN Luke, it is logical to assume Kun had not achieved his full potential, nor full power, all Jedi and Sith, achieve their full power, as they age and gain experience, after their peak, their age gradually wears away their force potential, however Kun has displayed extraordinary powers, for a young Dark Lord, while the same Luke at the same age, displayed impressive skills, but none that equal Kun
Originally posted by w00t2112
Just like Sidious was revived, into a clone and moreso a younger body, he became much more powerful than his ROTJ counterpart. If Kun was the be revived, it can easily be concluded that he would be much more powerful than his former self, however since there is no proof of this, it cannot be counted more than speculation
Originally posted by w00t2112
However, you have effectively played feat wars with IKC, Kun drained the entire race of the Massassi, Luke cut down hundreds of Vong, including their leader. But draining thousands of lives, and causing their demise, is far more impressive than wielding a saber and cutting down Vong, whom were more powerful than your average soldier. Remeber Kun also defeated dark monsters, that were huge and created from Sith Alchemy, yet Kun's force powers, that came out as controlled beams out of the amulet were powerful enough to literally cut the Dark side monsters into pieces.
Feat (from dictionary.com)
1. A notable act or deed, especially an act of courage; an exploit.
2. An act of skill, endurance, imagination, or strength; an achievement.
3. Obsolete. A specialized skill; a knack.
Saying that you cannot use feats in an argument is like saying that OT duelists are better than is seen because of 70s special effects. Granted there was only one comic on Kun. But that comic described and listed plenty of feats that Kun accomplished. Your trying to tell me that if there were more comics on Kun that he would have more powerful feats each comic? Fanboy garbage. What we have on Kun is plenty enough to give us a good idea of how powerful he is.
Originally posted by w00t2112
DN Luke has displayed impressive force abilities, at his full potential.
Exar Kun has displayed just as impressive abilities, during his younger age. Logic dictates that, Kun having reached the age of DN Luke, would be far more powerful than any incarntion of Luke.
Originally posted by w00t2112
Consider one last thing, tdtd, Kun had one comic written about him, Luke has almost 50 books, so for those who say that Luke has done more, he has only merely a full display of his power, unlike Kun who has very few feats to name, although impressive, so by bringing into the fight, so many feats, you have effectively displayed all of Luke's power, but you haven't proved that Kun is inferior to Luke.
Nai Fohl has already proved that DN Luke is more powerful than Kun. Assuming that if more Kun comics were made that he would display feats on Luke's level is crap. Thats total speculation. Again read my above argument.