Originally posted by Captain Falcon
http://images.google.co.uk/images?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&q=facts+of+intelligent+design&hl=en&btnG=Search+Images
HUH?
Originally posted by Mindship
As long as we're at it, since medicine hasn't found a cure for AIDs, cancer, and other diseases (due to gaps in knowledge), we had best start thinking of supplanting medical science with medical prayer.No doubt, a proponent of ID would prefer this, should their health start to seriously fail.
For the last time I'm not a creationist.
Originally posted by Mindship
As long as we're at it, since medicine hasn't found a cure for AIDs, cancer, and other diseases (due to gaps in knowledge), we had best start thinking of supplanting medical science with medical prayer.No doubt, a proponent of ID would prefer this, should their health start to seriously fail.
I get your point, but the problem is the placebo effect. Prayer can work.
Originally posted by Da preacher
It isn't because the Homo Habilis 'didn't' walk upright he can't be a linked to man. They used tools, were very similar in the way their body was built.Pikaia didn't walk upright, he didn't even have lungs, still he is seen as the first animal that can be linked to man.
(sorry, I don't really speak English that good).
Your English is fine, Homo habillis is similar to austalopithecine apes. They both have long arms,short legs and and similar skeletal structure.
Homo haballis had fingers and toes that were great for climbing and there jaws were similar to today's apes.Their 600 cc average cranial capacity similar ot austalopithecine.
EDIT: Homo haballis is more ape like and is no way related to man.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison😂
You sound like a Dem. "I know what you are doing is wrong, but I have no answers myself". 😆 jk
Originally posted by Blue nocturneErmm, do you know DNA is?
Your English is fine, Homo habillis is similar to austalopithecine apes. They both have long arms,short legs and and similar skeletal structure.
Homo haballis had fingers and toes that were great for climbing and there jaws were similar to today's apes.Their 600 cc average cranial capacity similar ot austalopithecine.EDIT: Homo haballis is more ape like and is no way related to man.
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Falcon you hate religion,so whatever BS theory some panel accepts you do to that is so illogical.
Penn: okay so here's my point. As Charles Darwin wrote, it is interestingly to contomplate an intangled bank, clothes with many plants of any kind, with birds singing in the bushes, and various insects fliding about, and with worms crawling about in the damp earth, and to reflect, that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from another, and yet so dependant on eachother in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us, thus, from the war of nature; From famine and death. The most exulted object we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of higher animals, directly follows. There's a grandure in this view of life. Richard Dawkins short description is: Life results from the non-random survival, of randomly varying replicators. Okay, now what's the creatinoist argument?
*Teller hits him with a bible*