Originally posted by Captain Falcon
Penn: okay so here's my point. As Charles Darwin wrote, it is interestingly to contomplate an intangled bank, clothes with many plants of any kind, with birds singing in the bushes, and various insects fliding about, and with worms crawling about in the damp earth, and to reflect, that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from another, and yet so dependant on eachother in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us, thus, from the war of nature; From famine and death. The most exulted object we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of higher animals, directly follows. There's a grandure in this view of life. Richard Dawkins short description is: Life results from the non-random survival, of randomly varying replicators. Okay, now what's the creatinoist argument?*Teller hits him with a bible*
Falcon, with all seriousness the theory of evolution is a dud, there no valid transitional forms found( Despite the fact there should be millions if evolution is real), Mutations cannot create new traits, as much as they've tried it's never happened, and natural selection has never been observed to produce new species.
Science comes the Latin word "scientia" which means to know, Science is about questioning and experimenting, Not accepting theories blindly Darwinism doesn't hold up, in all honesty have you ever tested any of the theories you've learned or have just accepted them as true because you were told?