Prove creationism...I'll shut up!

Blue Nocturne> I have answered your questions - more than once actually. You ignoring the answers and claiming you have not received them is becoming a little boring in fact.

Captain Falcon> I see...
Well, then. Why do Creationists not understand, that you will not proove theory B, by disproving theory A?

Originally posted by The Omega
Blue Nocturne> I have answered your questions - more than once actually. You ignoring the answers and claiming you have not received them is becoming a little boring in fact.

Captain Falcon> I see...
Well, then. Why do Creationists not understand, that you will not proove theory B, by disproving theory A?

That's not how science works.

I really don't know how people can argue so foolishly; if you try and attack the weakest points of B, you don't prove A since there IS no proof for A.

Originally posted by Wesker
I really don't know how people can argue so foolishly; if you try and attack the weakest points of B, you don't prove A since there IS no proof for A.

I'm just baffled that people can be that self-contradictory and not know it.

Originally posted by The Omega
Blue Nocturne> I have answered your questions - more than once actually. You ignoring the answers and claiming you have not received them is becoming a little boring in fact.

Captain Falcon> I see...
Well, then. Why do Creationists not understand, that you will not proove theory B, by disproving theory A?

I don't know I'm not a creationist.

Originally posted by Wesker
I'm just baffled that people can be that self-contradictory and not know it.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
I don't know I'm not a creationist.

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
✅

But you're still stupid. It's okay to not like evolution and think it's a dumb theory, but ignoring the facts and making up others is bullshit. Just say what you think, if you're skeptical on the evolution theory, that's fine but, what do you think happened is probably more interesting.

Falcon What facts have I ignore, please list them

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Falcon What facts have I ignore, please list them

Do you really care about facts, I don't think so. However, I could be wrong, but so far you have pushed aside all the facts by saying show me the facts. No one can show a blind man anything.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Do you really care about facts, I don't think so. However, I could be wrong, but so far you have pushed aside all the facts by saying show me the facts. No one can show a blind man anything.

My friend what solid facts have you claimed that I have ignored?

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
My friend what solid facts have you claimed that I have ignored?

There you go again. I'm not talking about facts, I'm talking about attitude. Maybe you don't see it, if that is the case, then I can't help you.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There you go again. I'm not talking about facts, I'm talking about attitude. Maybe you don't see it, if that is the case, then I can't help you.

How do you know my attitude if were not talking in person?

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
How do you know my attitude if were not talking in person?

I only know what I read, so I am only talking about what you have written.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I only know what I read, so I am only talking about what you have written.

Man, I read everyones rebuttals and responded, yet I get accused of ignoring them when they don't even answer mine.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Man, I read everyones rebuttals and responded, yet I get accused of ignoring them when they don't even answer mine.

I have tried to be careful in my response.

Because your stance is thus: evolution seemingly has "problems", therefore, it is not true.

And what you fail to realize is that evolution is a scientific theory (Read: best possible hypothesis on current evidence and information) that is verified and sworn by by people who far outrank yourself in terms of understanding of the concept and many other natural concepts.

You claim you're not arguing for Creationism, and you claim you're liking ID but you can't argue ID. No one understands what it is you're trying to prove, and how.

Originally posted by Wesker
Because your stance is thus: evolution seemingly has "problems", therefore, it is not true.

And what you fail to realize is that evolution is a scientific theory (Read: best possible hypothesis on current evidence and information) that is verified and sworn by by people who far outrank yourself in terms of understanding of the concept and many other natural concepts.

You claim you're not arguing for Creationism, and you claim you're liking ID but you can't argue ID. No one understands what it is you're trying to prove, and how.

Evolution being accepted by high ranking people doesn't mean squat if test and data contradict that, there are scientist that disagree with it my point is the theory doesn't hold up.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I have tried to be careful in my response.

your the only one 😆

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Evolution being accepted by high ranking people doesn't mean squat if test and data contradict that, there are scientist that disagree with it my point is the theory doesn't hold up.

And my point is your opinion on what holds up isn't fact, and certainly hasn't been "proved" by your posts. You're just detracting from evolution because you're an ID sympathesizer.

Originally posted by Wesker
And my point is your opinion on what holds up isn't fact

Here's a claim from darwinsit:

Random muations add new traits to the gene pool, please tell me how this is possible.