Is Bush The Worst U.S. President Ever?

Started by docb7732 pages
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Yeah, Gore would have allowed the attacks on Sept 11th? But, I'm willing to bet that he wouldn't have sat motionless for 7 minutes after being informed teh country was under attack. I also find the excuse that "I'm disappointed in Bush, but couldn't make a better choice" absurd. The very people who laugh at a third, forth or even fifth party idea, are the very same people who laugh at the notion and dismiss their candidates so easily.

I haven't heard what Gore did when he heard the news, but I did hear that Kerry sat there looking dumb at some other senators who were doing the same for upwards of 30 min. That Micheal Moore movie has already been proven to be nothing more than Anti-Bush propaganda, Lies and misrepresentations. I'm wondering what Roosevelt did when he heard about Pearl Harbor or what Lincoln did when he heard about Fort Sumter. Reflection and calm isn't a bad thing. If he were as bad as the Liberal Left make him out to be he would have bombed bagdad right then.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
"Both parties" is the problem. "Both" implies a limitation on options. When "both parties" are controlled by the same special intrest minorities, then there will never be a true democracy. Which would imply something if we lived in a democracy. But we don't. We live in a republic. A republic which is just as easily subverted as the Roman repbulic.

Hey, If I were old enough I probably would have voted for Perot. I haven't seen any really viable 3rd party candidates since then though. I kind of wish someone would step forward.

Originally posted by docb77
I haven't heard what Gore did when he heard the news, but I did hear that Kerry sat there looking dumb at some other senators who were doing the same for upwards of 30 min. That Micheal Moore movie has already been proven to be nothing more than Anti-Bush propaganda, Lies and misrepresentations. I'm wondering what Roosevelt did when he heard about Pearl Harbor or what Lincoln did when he heard about Fort Sumter. Reflection and calm isn't a bad thing. If he were as bad as the Liberal Left make him out to be he would have bombed bagdad right then.

Hey, If I were old enough I probably would have voted for Perot. I haven't seen any really viable 3rd party candidates since then though. I kind of wish someone would step forward.

Yeah, I'm sure. It's just too bad that it's Bush's JOB to do something else. Michael Moore is a turd. If you'd been around long enough to know how I feel, you would know that. It's just too bad that the only anti-Bush 9/11 conspiracy you've been exposed to is Michael Moore...in fact, it's ill-informed and irresponsible of you. Unless you're a member of a personality cult that tells you there's only one voice of opposition. Reflection is not a bad thing, but in the nuclear age, CALM is. It's irresponsible to sit in a Florida class room for 7 minutes while you're aware the country is under attack...being the PRESIDENT and all.

if you were old enough, you'd know it had two 'r's. And the only reason you don't think there's a viable 3rd party, is because you've been fooled into thinking that 2 is enough. You sit there and say you would have voted for Perrot, but do nothing about the limitation of options. Don't be a hypocrit.

Originally posted by Black Rob
Bush is the best president since Clinton
he's the only president after clinton.

Originally posted by docb77
I haven't heard what Gore did when he heard the news, but I did hear that Kerry sat there looking dumb at some other senators who were doing the same for upwards of 30 min. That Micheal Moore movie has already been proven to be nothing more than Anti-Bush propaganda, Lies and misrepresentations. I'm wondering what Roosevelt did when he heard about Pearl Harbor or what Lincoln did when he heard about Fort Sumter. Reflection and calm isn't a bad thing.

That has to be one of the most ridiculous attempts at an explanation as to why he sat there like a lemon that I've ever read.

Originally posted by docb77
If he were as bad as the Liberal Left make him out to be he would have bombed bagdad right then.

How naive! For all intents and purposes he did.

Originally posted by soleran30
So basically your saying republicans and democrats need to STFU and we need better choices!

I dont know what he thinks on that but I will say that we for sure need to get a third party started but the republicans and democrats are all in it together,they sleep together.not literally mind you 😉 but Clinton and Bush have been long time friends with each other and both have stong connections to the CIA.There needs to be a thrid party started to represent the people because neither one of the parties with we have now do.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I dont know what he thinks on that but I will say that we for sure need to get a third party started but the republicans and democrats are all in it together,they sleep together.not literally mind you 😉 but Clinton and Bush have been long time friends with each other and both have stong connections to the CIA.There needs to be a thrid party started to represent the people because neither one of the parties with we have now do.

Adding a third party won't truly resolve this issue it just adds layers to a cake. I will say that regardless I do prefer the US govt to a great many if not all other govt's in the world, none are perfect.

Ross Perot only has one r. My bad. 😮

If only Ross Perot had been elected back in 96 when he was running against Clinton and Doe. 🙁 the truth is the country would not be in the mess it is now with 9-11,oklahoma city bombing,ect.Perot is not connected with any government agency like Clinton and the Bushs are so I knew it would never come to pass.

Originally posted by Captain Falcon
he's the only president after clinton.
Does anyone else feel pain because of this answer?

I think he's using 'after' in the sequential sense. Some smart kid said "Bush is the best president since Clinton", a page before...

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
I think he's using 'after' in the sequential sense. Some smart kid said "Bush is the best president since Clinton", a page before...

Yes, he said that in a response to that...it's like explaining a joke, just with more ignorance to it.

Oh...Just like I did?

It's always the most sophisticated jokes that get me.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Oh...Just like I did?

It's always the most sophisticated jokes that get me.

Yeah, I know, was a great one...well thought through and all that...easy to miss if you don't have the mental capacities...

Ahh whats funnier the pervasive wit or the critics of humor....................lol................is Bush the worst president ever?

Probably not, every president has their haters screaming from the balconies.

Bush is another in a on going line of bull-shit presidents. However, others haven't been as influential. But, anyone who wants to pretend that he doesn't have an agenda, is fooling themselves. 9/11, the war in Iraq, foreign policy, etc, etc....

I would shit my pants over a president that "got the joke"

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Bush is another in a on going line of bull-shit presidents. However, others haven't been as influential. But, anyone who wants to pretend that he doesn't have an agenda, is fooling themselves. 9/11, the war in Iraq, foreign policy, etc, etc....

I would shit my pants over a president that "got the joke"

😕 You really dont know anything about government and politics do you? You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Prove your points; all of them.

Everyone has an agenda.................Bush is no different.

Originally posted by soleran30

Probably not, every president has their haters screaming from the balconies.

👆

Originally posted by soleran30
Everyone has an agenda.................Bush is no different.

👆

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
😕 You really dont know anything about government and politics do you? You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Prove your points; all of them.

Disprove my points, all of them. You can't honestly say that a man elected to teh office of president is infallible. All you do is prove my points about people who subscribe to the idea of personality cults. Explain to me one thing that the "re-born" christian, George W. Bush has doen that's christian, and everyone can laugh at you ignorant logic.

Originally posted by The Black Ghost
😕 You really dont know anything about government and politics do you? You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Prove your points; all of them.

No HE does.YOU clearly are clueless about it though. 🙄 the proof is out there,you just dont want to see it because it frightens you too much. 🙄