I don't think it should just be based on dominance though. Obviously, recent performance should be big factor, and none of the other 5 guys I listed higher have looked quite as badly in any of their recent fights as Anderson did in his first fight with Chael, or even the first round in the second. The other guys don;t lose 10-8 rounds... ever.
Also, you have to admit that most people would say that the competition that, at least Jones and GSP have been facing, would kill that of Anderson. And Jones has been doing it in quick succession.
But anyways, quetsion for Style this time:
Do you think that if Chael Sonnen actually had good GnP like people like Jones or Cain Velasquez, that he might have been able to finish the fight in the first?
Do you think that if Chael Sonnen didn;t have such bad recurring submission dfence, he would have ended up winning the first fight with at least a 6 point differential in probably the most one sided championship fight ever?
Ignore all the stuff about Anderson potentially cheating abd the stupid elbow or whatnot, do you think that if Chael actually had good standup, he would have been able to survive longer, and long enough to eventually land a TD in the second, and the other rounds as well?
How do you thnk Chael stacks up against GSP and Jones? Or even someone like Rashad?
If you answer these honestly, I;m sure you would have to admit that you can;t really consider Anderson Silva better than GSP or Jones, or even Dominick Cruz, P4P wise.