NFL Talk

Started by Cooper Klan Kid497 pages

i actually see the colts winning that game

The colts are 3 point underdogs for that game

I will give the Al Davis and the Raiders credit for hiring a new defensive coordinator for last Sunday's game:

even though davis is like 90

The Colts have done a better at stopping the run. Portis only ran for 43 yards and he is one of the best backs in the league. Maybe Dillion and the rookie can be shut down too.

I think New England will win, but I think if they do win, it aint Manning's fault, it will be the team's fault.

My prediction 31-28 for New England, with Vintenteri (sp) missing the game winning field goal, and goadgaojlakgasdlgkj kicking the game winning field goal with 0 seconds left. Thats my prediction.

Gostokowski is kinda amazing. I remember watching him in some of those college contests before the draft thinking NE needs to draft this kid.

colts did a decent job vs the run for one game. Denver took it to them BIG time on the ground. And Portis hurt himself on 2 seperate occasions that game.

I hope the Colts wreck the Patriots. I hate the Patriots.

Originally posted by Smasandian
The Colts have done a better at stopping the run. Portis only ran for 43 yards and he is one of the best backs in the league. .

He had 2 attempts in the second half and 12 overall. The score right after his last attempt (meaning, the next time he'd step on the field) was 33-14. Plus, he was slightly banged-up. The Colts' D did handle him in the first quarter, I'll give you that. As a team, the Redskins averaged 4.8 yards per rush.

I'm right there with the 31-28 prediction. Not sure about the Vinatieri miss, but that would be something else, wouldn't it?

Quote of the week:

Originally posted by Shawne Merriman
I'm not a cheater. I don't believe in cheating the game, I don't condone cheating the game, I have no reason to cheat the game. I'm about playing football and I'm a great football player. ... I will go out and be the best football player possible and be known as one of the best to ever play.

My opinion is, if the guy comes back and performs at the same All-Pro level, good for him. If not, hope he's ready to live with Broncos and Raiders fans calling him 'Steroid Shawne' for a long, long time.

he has tested clean 3 times since he tested dirty.

What a shocker!

I've been pulled for speeding a few times in my life, and I can pretty much guarantee you that I stayed within 10 MPH of the speed limit for a good two months after that.

well i dont know how long whatever he supposedly did stays in your system. Im not saying he didnt do it, but it is possible to have a false positive of some sort, and come back and take 3 new tests to show ur clean. Then people say why drop the appeal then? Well because he could get screwed worse missing some of the most important games of the year if he couldnt prove his case.

I agree. I'm pretty sure scheduling was a major factor in that decision.

Originally posted by DanZeke25
I hope the Colts wreck the Patriots. I hate the Patriots.

me too
stupid ass patriots 😠

Originally posted by forumcrew
well i dont know how long whatever he supposedly did stays in your system. Im not saying he didnt do it, but it is possible to have a false positive of some sort, and come back and take 3 new tests to show ur clean. Then people say why drop the appeal then? Well because he could get screwed worse missing some of the most important games of the year if he couldnt prove his case.

He tested dirty. There is nothing else.

I might be wrong, but he's reasoning for the appeal was that he didnt know that the stuff he took had steriods in it, but not that the test was wrong?

If thats the case, he's a moron for not looking up the ingredients in the pills, or look at the sheet that the NFL sends out that contains all the banned products.

Okay, got a "You be the coach" scenario I've often muddled over through the years. Anyone interested, take a shot.

RCA Dome
Indianapolis 26, Dallas 20
4th Quarter
1:57 remaining
Ball at Colts' 4-yard line, 1st and goal for the Cowboys.

While Parcells has used all his timeouts getting the 'Boys in scoring position, Dungy has mismanaged his timeouts. Both teams have zero.

From a coach's standpoint, what exactly do you call if you're Parcells?
Now Jim Nance would say, right off the bat, get the points! But it may not be that simple.

Considering the play clock is 40 seconds, what is your gameplan? And to add a twist, do you tell your players to purposively not score on 1st and 2nd down? Lots of factors.

I think many coaches would run, throw, throw, and throw, which if you scored on 2nd down would leave Manning about 65 seconds to try to get a GW field goal. When you think about it, the decision might come down to this: Is the probability of scoring a TD on 2 plays (3rd and 4th down) greater than stopping Peyton Manning's team with over a minute to work with, or possibly even a minute and forty!

kneel it on first down. Run it up the middle on second down and "try" to score. if you don't score.. on third down u run a fade to T.O. with a TE going to the back of the end zone as a back up to the fade. Fourth down... u run a roll-out option with romo and marion barber with someone leaking into the end zone( preferably glenn or witten. i don't trust T.O. on fourth down after his drop on 4th and 2.) Never.. and i mean NEVER give peyton more than 45 seconds when they only need a field goal, because all he has to do is get the ball to around the 40 to give vinetari a chance to win the game, and even if the fg is 57 or 58 yards, vinetari will nail it.

i think you have to score as soon as you can, the redzone is a hard place to score there is less room to run around and easier for the D to clamp down. Never take for granted that you can score. Now on the colts side if we are talking about this years D Id say let them walk in on first down when they try to run it, give manning his full arsenal of time cause id have no faith in them being able to stop them from running it in.

That's a point about being on the defensive side of it that I thought about adding to it as well. I would just rather give up the TD (despite the critics) and give my offense more time to work with rather than having to throw hail mary's with 20 seconds left after the other team finally crossed the goal line on fourth down.

Panthers got burned by leaving Brady too much time in Super Bowl XXXVIII. It's a sensitive issue because you'd never want to "take off" potential points, but the thought of the other team's drive has gotta be lurking in the back eof your mind when you score with 90+ seconds left.

Score as soon as possible. That's my reasoning. Let them try to beat you.

But it depends on how well the Boy's defense is playing. If the points were scored on them in the start of the game, but they have stopped them consistenly in the second half, then let the defense try to keep the game. If the other way around, then maybe try to whittle down the clock a bit.

My understanding is that you always try to score in the 2 minute period. You never know what might happened near the 20 second mark especially against the Colts. What could happen is that they hand it over to Barber and gets 2 yards on two carries. On third down, using the play to take down the play clock, you would roughly have to about 30 seconds or so. So what happens if you have to pass to either stop the clock or get the TD and you get sacked...they're goes 10 seconds just to get the ball back. So you have roughly 10 seconds to get the last play in, and because everybody is rushing everywhere to get into to place, the offense will probably screw up.

I say go get the TD and hope your defense shuts Manning down.

so this is the 12th thread i've posted in in about 2 hours .. without a response.. i'm bored. Someone argue with me about something.. colts patriots game... steelers broncos game.. something.