NFL Talk

Started by TaZ#12497 pages

I like the Titans but 9-10 games for me.

Something's fishy.

He gets interviewed by how many teams for the head coach position, then gets turned down by the Cowboys, and then gets released by the Bears (end of contract) as defensive coordinator, and then gets hired as an linebackers coach. What the hell? Is something wrong?

Personally, I dont really care if Rivera gets hired as linebackers coach. The defense is already great but losing Phillips is going to hurt.

The pats franchising Samual is surpraising but if you think about it, who else would replace him. Thier secondary is already weak, and losing thier best CB would be a bad move.

Originally posted by LORDSIDIOUS01
I thought this thread was about pro football?

...NFL...

Edit**

Lol I just seen what you were talking about!

The Rivera move is clearly a demotion but I think they are grooming him to take over the Bolts after Turner washes out in a year or so.

Why?

Why wouldnt they just hire him outright. I personally dont think he needs grooming to become an head coach.

That's the baffling part. I don't understand it, but it's the best I can interpret it.

Norv Turner is one sorry head coach. I seriously doubt that the Chargers will win a lot of games.

They'll win games on there talent alone, but come postseason, and games are decided by preparation, and coaching it should be interesting to say the least.

Tom Brady is gonna be a daddy. Or is he????? I think both knew,but only now its coming out that Tom is a father.

Still thinking 10 or 12 victories.

Maybe, the major reason Turner got hired is because of Rivers. Turner is very good in making good QB's and just one year in San Fran did wonders for Alex Smith.

Maybe thats the reason.

It's the same reason why Phillips was hired for Dallas. It was because he is like the granddaddy of 3-4 defenses and thats the main reason why he was hired, to fix the defense. It would be interesting to see how well the Dallas defense plays.

Originally posted by Smasandian
Maybe, the major reason Turner got hired is because of Rivers. Turner is very good in making good QB's and just one year in San Fran did wonders for Alex Smith.

Maybe thats the reason.

It's the same reason why Phillips was hired for Dallas. It was because he is like the granddaddy of 3-4 defenses and thats the main reason why he was hired, to fix the defense. It would be interesting to see how well the Dallas defense plays.

Maybe, but I doubt if the chargers will win a lot of games.

Why not?

Coaches make a difference, but not that big of a difference. They still have the players, and Norv Turner isnt that bad of an coach.

Originally posted by Smasandian
Why not?

Coaches make a difference, but not that big of a difference. They still have the players, and Norv Turner isnt that bad of an coach.

Sorry to disagree with you but Norv Turner makes a better offensive coordinator than a head coach. Remember just because he inherits a great offensive really doesn't mean much. They still have to play from week one to week sixteen and hope they win enough games to make the playoffs. Remember las season when they won 14 games, then laid an egg when it counted the most.

Could happen but I don't know.

So who says that Norv Turner cannot win alot of games?

Is it because of the Raiders (sorry, but the majority of mistakes were made personal wise and thats Al Davis era). He wasnt the best coach in the world, but I wouldnt count him out working with incredible players. It might work out. But I see the Chargers winning atleast 10 games.

We'll see what Norv can do this year and then critisize.

Originally posted by Smasandian
So who says that Norv Turner cannot win alot of games?

Is it because of the Raiders (sorry, but the majority of mistakes were made personal wise and thats Al Davis era). He wasnt the best coach in the world, but I wouldnt count him out working with incredible players. It might work out. But I see the Chargers winning atleast 10 games.

I think he'll win alteast 10, but like I said before, the real question is if he is going to do anything in the playoffs when coaching is just as crucial as talent.

Whatever.

I dont really care if the coach does well in the playoffs or not. It's the team that I care about, and its the team that wins playoffs. Coaching is crucial, but its more crucial on the personel side than coaching side.

I don't follow, you're saying that coaching is a vital part of winning but not as vital as the talent around the coaching?

If thats what your saying than I think the Patriots are a prime example that disputes that.