NFL Talk

Originally posted by Lord Evolution
He hasn't shown much brilliance? Even Adrian Peterson is averaging over 20 attempts a game. And he is a rookie. So far I have him as my leading candidate for rookie of the year. But if he was only averaging 9 rushing attempts a game, like Bush, then their numbers would be the same, but Bush would most likely be averaging more than 90 yards a game on the ground if he was getting 21 rushing attempts. How do you expect a player to show "brilliance" only getting that many carries? I don't care what a damn "analyst" says. I know what I have seen, and I know what Bush is capable of. You have no proof to back of the statement that he can't carry the load, because the only game where he has had 20 carries, he had 120 yards and a TD. Those ARE good numbers aren't they?

I really don't understand what people are expecting out of Bush. Especially the Saints. You have to give the guy more attempts if you expect him to break off big plays and put up gaudy numbers. And the people saying that he has been a disappointment, what kind of numbers do you want? 9 carries and 200 yards? Even if he averages 5 yards per carry, that is only 45 yards.

The proof is in the games he has played. Bush is too small and not that durable. As for Peterson, he is totally different than Bush. He's used to carrying the load. Big things should be expected of Bush, he was a winner at USC and so far hasn't not delivered anything yet to the city of New Orleans. You are also forgetting that pro defenses are a whole lot different and better than college defenses.

Now were making things up? He's not durable? I guess USC shouldn't have had him playing kick returner, punt returner, half back and WR. Saints play him at all but KR. He's in on almost every play. When did durability ever become a factor? Size has nothing to do with it. Running backs are on average 6 feet and weigh just as much as Bush. He's the fastest running back in the league, He needs more carries. And don't give me that "big things were expected of him, he hasn't delivered" I'm going to ask again, what do you expect him to do with only 9 carries?

Originally posted by Lord Evolution
Now were making things up? He's not durable? I guess USC shouldn't have had him playing kick returner, punt returner, half back and WR. Saints play him at all but KR. He's in on almost every play. When did durability ever become a factor? Size has nothing to do with it. Running backs are on average 6 feet and weigh just as much as Bush. He's the fastest running back in the league, He needs more carries. And don't give me that "big things were expected of him, he hasn't delivered" I'm going to ask again, what do you expect him to do with only 9 carries?

I mean he is NOT durable to varry 25+ times a game. That is what star running backs do in the NFL. Joseph Addai. Walter Payton. Marcus Allen. Chris Brown. Edgerrin James when he was a Colt. Those are examples of durable running backs that can carry the load. Reggie can't, if he proves me wrong by the end of the season, then I'll send him an email.

Will you answer my question?

What do you expect him to do with only 9 carries?

And how exactly do you know he isn't durable to do that if he hasn't carried that many times so far, and the only time he even came close to that number was the game I keep mentioning? Durabilty is not and never will be a problem with Bush. I don't know where that came from, from teh ass maybe?

Originally posted by Lord Evolution
Will you answer my question?

What do you expect him to do with only 9 carries?

And how exactly do you know he isn't durable to do that if he hasn't carried that many times so far, and the only time he even came close to that number was the game I keep mentioning? Durabilty is not and never will be a problem with Bush. I don't know where that came from, from teh ass maybe?

Nine carries is good for someone that isn't expected to carry the ball 20+ times for sixteen weeks of football. I don't know about you, but I went to a lot of USC games. I saw him play in person as well as on television. The only way that Bush would change my mind would be to actually see him carry the ball that many times the next Saints game. Also durability means that the TB carries the ball well over 300 times in a 16 week schedule. Look at Larry Johnson, he's durable, but after 3 games he isn't doing so good. Look at LT, he is MR. EVERYTHING, but he is only averaging a great 2.1 yards a carry after the few games.

Who cares about Reggie BUsh? Let him do something worthwhile before we start kissing his poop shute.

Dont you understand, its not Bush's fault that the suppose genius can call plays.

Even though, he was perfectly alright last year and was felched as the next best coach.

The Saints and Reggie Bush being 0-3 is the least of my worries. The Bengals play the Patriots monday night. Although knowing the Bengals we will win and then procede to lose to the Kansas City Chiefs 2 weeks later....

Anyway I do think we have a shot, if we play mistake free football. But how likely is that? lol

Originally posted by Smasandian
Dont you understand, its not Bush's fault that the suppose genius can call plays.

Even though, he was perfectly alright last year and was felched as the next best coach.

He changed it up. Duece was getting more than 10 carries a game, Bush was getting more than 9. Their deep ball has been nonexistent,and their defense is on the field way too much, attribute that to the lack of a run game and a lot of 3 and outs.

Originally posted by Pezmerga
The Saints and Reggie Bush being 0-3 is the least of my worries. The Bengals play the Patriots monday night. Although knowing the Bengals we will win and then procede to lose to the Kansas City Chiefs 2 weeks later....

Anyway I do think we have a shot, if we play mistake free football. But how likely is that? lol

not sure about that shot. I dont see how the bengals defense will be able to stop NE at all. They couldnt stop the browns at all. No one could cover Nate Burelson, so whos gonna cover Moss, Stallworth, Welker, Watson, and then the trio of RB's that can all catch the ball out of the back field. I fully expect the Pats to put up at least 40 on them. Not to say Palmer wont get some but they have already shown that Palmer can throw for 300+ yards with TJ and Chad each having big games and they can still lose.

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Walter Payton. Marcus Allen. Chris Brown.

I had to do a double-take on this one.

Originally posted by forumcrew
not sure about that shot. I dont see how the bengals defense will be able to stop NE at all. They couldnt stop the browns at all. No one could cover Nate Burelson, so whos gonna cover Moss, Stallworth, Welker, Watson, and then the trio of RB's that can all catch the ball out of the back field. I fully expect the Pats to put up at least 40 on them. Not to say Palmer wont get some but they have already shown that Palmer can throw for 300+ yards with TJ and Chad each having big games and they can still lose.

I know that, but this is the NFL. Any team has a shot. (Also the browns are a divisional foe. It's not the first time we have had a shootout with the browns. The Seahawks are a better offense and they didnt put up 40+ on us)

Don't get me wrong though, I fully expect to lose. But one has to have some hope right? Otherwise what's the point in being a fan?

Originally posted by Pezmerga
I know that, but this is the NFL. Any team has a shot. (Also the browns are a divisional foe. It's not the first time we have had a shootout with the browns. The Seahawks are a better offense and they didnt put up 40+ on us)

Don't get me wrong though, I fully expect to lose. But one has to have some hope right? Otherwise what's the point in being a fan?

if nate burelson could catch they would have put up at least 35.

If the bengals could tackle then we would have beat the browns =P.

Originally posted by Pezmerga
If the bengals could tackle then we would have beat the browns =P.

And played DEFENSE also. The Bengals must play error free ball, thats the only way to win on monday. Otherwise I see The Patriots winning in a laugher.

Yeah but one of their biggest problems is tackling on defense.

And I agree. I know it has to be error free ball. That's what I said. Hopefully NE doesn't play error free. lol But they most likely will.

Originally posted by Pezmerga
Yeah but one of their biggest problems is tackling on defense.

And I agree. I know it has to be error free ball. That's what I said. Hopefully NE doesn't play error free. lol But they most likely will.

tackling would help but it doesnt matter if there is no one near the oppositions WR's.

Originally posted by Pezmerga
Yeah but one of their biggest problems is tackling on defense.

And I agree. I know it has to be error free ball. That's what I said. Hopefully NE doesn't play error free. lol But they most likely will.

Will anybody pressure Brady to throw picks?

I am late, but, to all of the san francisco fans. I am sorry that you had to watch your home team bent over and spanked by the PITTSBURGH STEELERS!!!. Hopefully your 9'ers will be able to remove the dildo the that STEELERS lodged up their ass during the rapping last Sunday and be able to pull off a win this week.

GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Will anybody pressure Brady to throw picks?

Yeah lol....Maybe the bookies.