Scantily dressed=****?

Originally posted by silver_tears
I depends how it's done.
There's a classy way to dress revealing skin, and then of course there's a trashy way. I mean if you're wearing latex, vinyl, leather, there's straps digging into your skin, things are hanging out that's trashy.

Social construct.

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
^ ✅ I remember that skit.

Ladies, I know choosing to wear scant clothing don't make you a ho and men shouldn't assume that, but you in a ho's unifom and that shit is confusing as hell. That would be like if I were to wear a cop's uniform, walk down a street, and if some one were to come up to me and say "Officer, I need help!"--"Nope sorry, not a cop, just felt like wearing this uniform today!"

-Dave Chappell ^ fact

Isn't this typical, a man decides what is appropriate for a woman to wear, and what isn't.

Besides, that analogy is so stupid its hardly worth commenting on.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Isn't this typical, a man decides what is appropriate for a woman to wear, and what isn't.

Besides, that analogy is so stupid its hardly worth commenting on.

Pretty much.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Social construct.

Exactly! Social construct...which is why people find it hard to accept and respect anything that is outside of that social 'norm'.

If I read it correctly, he said that dressing like a ho doesn't make you one and men don't have the right to assume so.

The joke (note that) was that it's confusing. It was a joke. He's not saying "You are a ho if you dress like one."

...or not.

-AC

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Isn't this typical, a man decides what is appropriate for a woman to wear, and what isn't.

Besides, that analogy is so stupid its hardly worth commenting on.

Well...it is a joke after all.

Didn't you get the memo, Bardock?

Men making sexist jokes about females isn't allowed anymore. Females can still do it though. They get the "YOU GO GIRL!" chants.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
If I read it correctly, he said that dressing like a ho doesn't make you one and men don't have the right to assume so.

The joke (note that) was that it's confusing. It was a joke. He's not saying "You are a ho if you dress like one."

...or not.

-AC

Yeah, of course. But the fact that you can 'confuse' whores from those who are not whores based on how they are dressed still stands in the joke. Which was what I refered to.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Yeah, of course. But the fact that you can 'confuse' whores from those who are not whores based on how they are dressed still stands in the joke. Which was what I refered to.

Yeah, but it's also a joke. That's the whole point. It's a joke.

"I find it confusing" is the joke. He doesn't actually find it confusing, he's using that to illustrate his point. You know, exaggerating it so that it's funny.

He's a comedian.

-AC

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Isn't this typical, a man decides what is appropriate for a woman to wear, and what isn't.

Besides, that analogy is so stupid its hardly worth commenting on.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't women decide what men should wear?

Only if you live under an extremely large digit on your hand that is not classed as a 'finger'.

Originally posted by docb77
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't women decide what men should wear?

Yes but that's because some women simply have to have a good looking piece of manly, muscular, good looking meat on their arms.

Not that there's any hypocricy there.

-AC

Originally posted by docb77
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't women decide what men should wear?

quite directly in fact.

"that's what you're going to wear?"

[translation: get that ****ing getup off and put some decent cloths on or i will b!tch you out for the next week!!!!!!!!!!]

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Yeah, of course. But the fact that you can 'confuse' whores from those who are not whores based on how they are dressed still stands in the joke. Which was what I refered to.

If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it's reasonable to assume that it's a duck.

If some girl is walking with her **** pushed up under her chin while wearing a skirt that is showing the bottom portion of her ass, IE dressed like a street walker, then it's reasonable to assume that she's a whore/****/easy/attention whore.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
This is something that has been bothering me for a while, why is when a women is dressed in revieling clothing she is automatically refered to as a ****. I find it a stupid generalization

Originally posted by PVS
quite directly in fact.

"that's what you're going to wear?"

[translation: get that ****ing getup off and put some decent cloths on or i will b!tch you out for the next week!!!!!!!!!!]

The problem is: I can understand why women would want their partners to look nice out, although it does get taken too far.

I just don't understand why it's wrong for a man to suggest the same.

-AC

I'll let a woman dress me when I get to dress her. That's my stance. And most women know better than to let me dress them up how I like.

oh...........It's all animal instinct anyway...It's all a game......

Watch BackFire somehow land a model girlfriend, somehow.

Somehow his grotesque, "Dress like a porn star, b*tch" ways will come across as loveable to some mental female.

I just have a feeling.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Watch BackFire somehow land a model girlfriend, somehow.

Somehow his grotesque, "Dress like a porn star, b*tch" ways will come across as loveable to some mental female.

I just have a feeling.

-AC

I just need money, and it won't be a problem. Money > all when luring girls.