maul vs dooku

Started by Janus Marius5 pages

Yeah TPM Anakin < Maul. I seen it with my own eyes.

lol.. Why would AOTC Anakin be above Maul? Unless of course AOTC Anakin>Qui Gon... AKA Wrong.

I thought you meant ROTS Anakin. My mistake.

No my love..

Dooku more or less wastes him.

or less......

Dooku should be able to defeat him with relative ease.

Personally i think count dooku would lose against Darth maul. Darth maul would have stuck dooku with his light saber and dooku would be dead. nonetheless i think it would be a great fight

Originally posted by MASTER OWENS
Personally i think count dooku would lose against Darth maul. Darth maul would have stuck dooku with his light saber and dooku would be dead. nonetheless i think it would be a great fight

WTF?!?! The Count is leagus above Maul. It would take seconds for the Count to win. All he has to do is find an opening and strike. This is the sort of thing Dooku has been trained for and is a master of. Whereas Maul is extremely good he simply doesnt stand a chance.

Padawan Kenobi > Maul

Dooku > Jedi Master Kenobi

^ Just thought I'd slip in an ABC for shits and giggles. Nothing written in stone here.

Maul gets curbstomped. He's nothing compared to Dooku, to be honest. Dooku was the more powerful Sith. By leagues, as the Dooku fanboy stated.

And can I just point at that Dooku wtf pwned jedi master Obi-Wan TWICE in like 20 seconds. And I would like to say Count Dooku rocks!!!

Originally posted by Rampant ox
And can I just point at that Dooku wtf pwned jedi master Obi-Wan TWICE in like 20 seconds. And I would like to say Count Dooku rocks!!!

Yes yes, we all know he kicked the shit out of Kenobi. Relax, dude.

Fanboyism killed the cat.

Yeah, Dooku wins, but TPM Obi-Wan doesn't > Maul. <Maul was pwning him for the first 1/2 of their duel, while fending off Qui-Gon, and even at the end, when Maul was tired from battling and killing Qui-Gon after fighting both Jedi at the same time, he still pushed Kenobi in the pit even though Kenobi was using the Dark Side. Obi-Wan won by luck, despte his claim that there's no such thing as luck. He was just messing with Han when he said that.

Maul is better than Padawan Obi, for reasons stated above. Also, Maul can withstand lightning, it just pisses him off more. In a saber fight it would be close, but when the force is involved, Dooku has a definite edge. Maul gives Dooku a good run, but Dooku has a solid win, I'd say.

And Rampant, calm down, we all know you're in love with Dooku. You don't need to stain your skivvies every time you see a thread with his name in it, okay?

How was Maul better than Kenobi? As a Padawan, he had been on par with Maul the entire fight and at the end he began to overpower him. He showed that by slicing Maul's Lightsaber in half. Maul got angry and force pushed Kenobi. Kenobi wasn't exactly outmaneuvered when it came to Lightsaber dueling.

"They will be no match for you."

Originally posted by Antediluvian
How was Maul better than Kenobi? As a Padawan, he had been on par with Maul the entire fight and at the end he began to overpower him. He showed that by slicing Maul's Lightsaber in half. Maul got angry and force pushed Kenobi. Kenobi wasn't exactly outmaneuvered when it came to Lightsaber dueling.

Maul kicked Kenobi aside to fight Qui Gon early on. He outclassed both at the same time. When it came down to things, Kenobi was left hanging in a pit. That's how.

Actually when it came down to it Maul was falling down the pit in two pieces. Obi-Wan won fair and square however he did have a considerable amount of luck on his side.

I'd like to point out that Kenobi was a Knight in AotC. Not that it matters, though.

Maul is a better combatant than both TPM Qui Gon and Obi Wan, that should be clear.