UN Global Gun Ban?

Started by debbiejo41 pages

Originally posted by Bardock42
But you put yourself in danger...god..are you blind?

Well, hunting is not a necessity nowadays though.

I was only kidding about the nukes ya know..........but some bazookas would be nice...............and yes.........people like to hunt. It's a sport, and many people really fill their refrigerators with the stuff.........mmmm yummy!!

The US is big for hunters..

Originally posted by debbiejo
I was only kidding about the nukes ya know..........but some bazookas would be nice...............and yes.........people like to hunt. It's a sport, and many people really fill their refrigerators with the stuff.........mmmm yummy!!

The US is big for hunters..

Yeah, and gang wars...and gun deaths.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, and gang wars...and gun deaths.

with most of that being caused by the use of illegal fire arms.

Originally posted by Soleran
with most of that being caused by the use of illegal fire arms.

Yeah, but also enough with legal ones.

Originally posted by Soleran
with most of that being caused by the use of illegal fire arms.
yep, not us common citizens.........common people don't go around and shoot people with AK47's

Most gun owners arn't a problem. It's the gang members that cause trouble.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, but also enough with legal ones.

Which also happens everywhere else in the World. So in the USA people get shot we are uncivilised and the world cries foul.

Militaries in Africa (with legal fire arms) slaugher thousands in a day and people want to make a discussion of banning fire arms in the USA 😕

Not gonna happen cause we're 😖mart:

We know our history of the world..........

Originally posted by Soleran
Which also happens everywhere else in the World. So in the USA people get shot we are uncivilised and the world cries foul.

Militaries in Africa (with legal fire arms) slaugher thousands in a day and people want to make a discussion of banning fire arms in the USA 😕

I like you..so I will make this thread a little more obvious to you: "UN Global Gun Ban"

And although I have no figures for it, I will just say it is highly likely that in the US more people are killed with legal guns than in Germany altogether with guns ....(maybe even percentage wise)

Originally posted by debbiejo
yep, not us common citizens.........common people don't go around and shoot people with AK47's

Let me guess...the definition of a "common citizen" is that "they don't go around and shoot people with AK47's" ....how convenient.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I like you..so I will make this thread a little more obvious to you: "UN [b]Global Gun Ban"

And although I have no figures for it, I will just say it is highly likely that in the US more people are killed with legal guns than in Germany altogether with guns ....(maybe even percentage wise) [/B]

The global piece is nice however several people have focused on the USA and the gun ban has been addressed. If everyone and I stress everyone gives up guns sure. Until that that time the UN Global Gun ban isn't really a global gun ban. Its a gun ban for people that aren't in the military or police forces respectively. Its not a gun ban but a way to control alot of people rather easily.

Regardless of what guns do or how they are used in whatever society the UN Global Gun ban is shit

Never give your rights or authority over you to another!! ...IMO

Originally posted by Soleran
The global piece is nice however several people have focused on the USA and the gun ban has been addressed. If everyone and I stress [B]everyone gives up guns sure. Until that that time the UN Global Gun ban isn't really a global gun ban. Its a gun ban for people that aren't in the military or police forces respectively. Its not a gun ban but a way to control alot of people rather easily.

Regardless of what guns do or how they are used in whatever society the UN Global Gun ban is shit [/B]

Yes, that is the point...people that are not in the military or in the police don't need guns...and if they wouldn't have any the world would be a safer place.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes, that is the point...people that are not in the military or in the police don't need guns...and if they wouldn't have any the world would be a safer place.

The citizens of the World would be much easier to control is a better way to describe it.

How about arm all the citizens in Africa and see how many warlords spring up then and push them around and slaughter them.

You certainly see the world through some pretty glass's Bardock.

Originally posted by Soleran
The citizens of the World would be much easier to control is a better way to describe it.

How about arm all the citizens in Africa and see how many warlords spring up then and push them around and slaughter them.

You certainly see the world through some pretty glass's Bardock.

I think you see it through some violent, barbaric one....

Problem is...you can't trust "the citizens of the world" as far as you can spit a rat...the warlords you are talking about is a good example..if they wouldn't have guns we'd have a problem less.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think you see it through some violent, barbaric one....

Problem is...you can't trust "the citizens of the world" as far as you can spit a rat...the warlords you are talking about is a good example..if they wouldn't have guns we'd have a problem less.

Yes but they are supplying themselves with arms. Its not like they are going down to a local hardware shop and picking up assault rifles there.

And the so called "citizens of the world" where would you place the UN and military and police forces? Are they not citizens of the world as well, if so why do you trust them so much more implicitly?

Originally posted by Soleran
Yes but they are supplying themselves with arms. Its not like they are going down to a local hardware shop and picking up assault rifles there.

And the so called "citizens of the world" where would you place the UN and military and police forces? Are they not citizens of the world as well, if so why do you trust them so much more implicitly?

Well, I doubt they produce the weapons themself...they probably by them....and that is another problem that needs to eb taken care of. But jsut because there are other problems that are not possible to be controlled at the moment doesn't mean that a minor problem (guns of citizens) should be left aside. One has to start somewhere.

Well, I don't trust them but as I see it at the momehnt the people in charge are rather sane people. With acceptable views...

OK..........let's have all the big government have all the weapons in the world and leave the common folk unarmed............sounds like a plan............NOT

HISTORY!!

I think there should be stricter guns laws but guns should always be there for law abiding citizens. It's simply in our constitution like free speech.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I don't trust them but as I see it at the momehnt the people in charge are rather sane people. With acceptable views...

History shows us that acceptable views today can change tomorrow, no need to get caught with your pants down so to speak. Heck Native Americans and the US govt showed us that as well as with Germany and Jewish folks. Anyway as I said the Global UN gun ban is retarded it gives away any and all control to 2 small a group of people.

Originally posted by Soleran
History shows us that acceptable views today can change tomorrow, no need to get caught with your pants down so to speak. Heck Native Americans and the US govt showed us that as well as with Germany and Jewish folks. Anyway as I said the Global UN gun ban is retarded it gives away any and all control to 2 small a group of people.
yep............

*just reading now*