The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Dr McBeefington3,287 pages
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
They are. Every single person who subscribes to a religion is doing so to reach a goal. Just as every single person who goes to scratch an itch is doing so to reach a goal.

This is incorrect. You don't speak for the religious, the ones who actually believe in God and have a basis for doing so. Religious people (such as religious jews) don't use religion to reach a goal. For them, there is God and Judaism and that's it. If people choose to call it a religion and claim they use it to get closer to god, that's your prerogative but that's not really how we classify it.

Your a jew...?

Damn...

Yes.. You couldn't tell by my penchant for money and lack of patience for homosexuality and all things not holy?

That and your crazy food laws. Sooo.. Is it true that christians are annoyed because the Jewish court basically sentenced Jesus to death?

Originally posted by UltimateAnomaly
That and your crazy food laws. Sooo.. Is it true that christians are annoyed because the Jewish court basically sentenced Jesus to death?

No but Christians have been riding the "you killed jesus" genocidal train since the crusades so it's not likely to stop anytime soon.

I wish all religion could just co-exist peacefully. I mean, Christianity uses the Old Testament. Hell, Islamic stories are like exactly the same as the Jewish ones.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
This is incorrect. You don't speak for the religious, the ones who actually believe in God and have a basis for doing so. Religious people (such as religious jews) don't use religion to reach a goal. For them, there is God and Judaism and that's it. If people choose to call it a religion and claim they use it to get closer to god, that's your prerogative but that's not really how we classify it.
It's not about getting closer to God. Getting closer to God is a tool that reaches the exact same goal that religion in general does. Or eating a food you like. Or playing a game you like. Everything humans knowingly do, whether it be physical and mundane, or spiritual and meaningful, is a tool.

Every single conscious action, by every single human, who has ever lived, was done on the conscious, semi-conscious, or unconscious feeling that doing so will bring us a measure of satisfaction. The tiniest iota of pleasure, or relief, is a "profit". A "gain". The acquisition of those gains is the goal. It is a constant, universal human trait, regardless of culture or time. Everything we ever do, say or decide is 100% "right" the very instant it's done. Even if we later regard that action as "wrong", the decision to label it so is "right". Everything we do on a day-to-day basis, regardless of how much "sense" it makes, is done with that goal of satisfaction in mind. Religion, faith, politics, ideologies, positions, jobs, recreation, whatever. We need to satisfy ourselves and our base demands. We need comfort and shelter. We need to feel strong and able. We need to feel we're right. We need to entertain ourselves. We need to ensure our survival. We need to feel good. We need many things.

God brings you comfort? Your political leaning makes sense to you? Football, not baseball? Propagation of the Master Race? Ice cream for dinner instead of a salad? Flagellate yourself? Tap your foot against the floor? Scratch your chin? Read the back of a pamphlet you found in the dentist's office? Murder a child on the orders of your commanding officer? Run a red light? Sacrifice your life to save another, reveling in your own selflessness seconds before regretting your stupid decision? Start humming a song? Judge something? Argue on the internet? Do the cinnamon challenge? Pray for forgiveness?

Satisfaction. All of it. Sating our wants and needs on every level imaginable. Literally everything we do is done for satisfaction. Or the attempt to attain it. Belief in your deity is no different.

^ So I can safely say, I believe what my friend said.
He finds happiness in 'knowing' that he will go to Heaven when he dies.

Originally posted by UltimateAnomaly
^ So I can safely say, I believe what my friend said.
He finds happiness in 'knowing' that he will go to Heaven when he dies.
He does. I find happiness in believing that Heaven is a myth. I also find happiness in getting that last achievement I need in Skyrim. My decision to waste precious hours of my life trying to get it is the right decision.

I find happiness in my love of science and particle physics. When I watch an hour long QnA session with Michio Kaku who co-founded String Field Theory, I feel happy that we've come a long way from beating rocks together.
We don't do things to hurt ourselves, mostly. I see religion as a tool which wants to make /LOADS/ of people happy, and a way to unite and bring people together in the happiness. Not that it always turns out like that.

I believe in morals based on common sense. Religion teaches morals. But too much morals goes against common sense and as the result against happiness.
Happened to live in a place with diverse religious groups and see all the disadvantages this diversity brings.

Originally posted by Arhael
I believe in morals based on common sense. Religion teaches morals. But too much morals goes against common sense and as the result against happiness.
Happened to live in a place with diverse religious groups and see all the disadvantages this diversity brings.

Thats a fair point. Having to learn morals from a book or scripture seems wrong. You shouldn't need to be told by a higher being or a prophet that killing or something is wrong. You should learn as you go through life. IMO

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
It's not about getting closer to God. Getting closer to God is a tool that reaches the exact same goal that religion in general does. Or eating a food you like. Or playing a game you like. Everything humans knowingly do, whether it be physical and mundane, or spiritual and meaningful, is a tool.
Sure, but that's semantics of the highest order, to the point where it's not even really relevent. It's like pointing out that the correct answer to any question is "everything is relative". True, but also largely irrelevent to the question.

Originally posted by Arhael
I believe in morals based on common sense. Religion teaches morals. But too much morals goes against common sense and as the result against happiness.
Happened to live in a place with diverse religious groups and see all the disadvantages this diversity brings.

Hitler and Stalin also believed in morals based on "common sense". LL, I don't need validation of a heaven, God, or afterlife to be happy or live my life. I'm not sure your example applies to most religious people.

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Sure, but that's semantics of the highest order, to the point where it's not even really relevent. It's like pointing out that the correct answer to any question is "everything is relative". True, but also largely irrelevent to the question.
I'm not really interested in answering the specifics of people's preferences. If DS wants a Jewish God, by all means...

What matters to me is that he wants a god at all. And that's where what I said above comes in. I hear (read) answers ranging from "Morality" to "I'm just used to it" to "It provides answers" to "I feel it". And every time it boils down to "Because it comforts me." For varying reasons and in different ways, people's faiths comfort them, via the sense of a greater presence who cares for them, or providing answers to questions they can't themselves answer. Religion/faith are useful tools for providing satisfaction.

Substitute 'religion' for any umbrella term and the answer's always the same. Humans want satisfaction, and we spend our days getting it however we're able. I think what you guys want is the reasons behind the picking of specific methods--religion/politics/recreation etc.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Hitler and Stalin also believed in morals based on "common sense". LL, I don't need validation of a heaven, God, or afterlife to be happy or live my life. I'm not sure your example applies to most religious people.
You've accepted faith for whatever reason you have, I won't claim to know the specifics. But the choice pleases you.

I'm not really interested in answering the specifics of people's preferences. If DS wants a Jewish God, by all means...

What do you mean I want a Jewish God? Lol


Substitute 'religion' for any umbrella term and the answers always the same. Humans want satisfaction, and we spend our days getting it however we're able. I think what you guys want is the reasons behind the picking of specific methods--religion/politics/recreation etc.

Substitute "religion" for moral relativism and you get the exact same conclusion, except I choose to look to a higher being instead of the idiocy of man.

You've accepted faith for whatever reason you have, I won't claim to know the specifics. But the choice pleases you.

You act as if my faith is blind. Do you actually believe that faith is blind by definition?

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Hitler and Stalin also believed in morals based on "common sense".

Edit: This argument is getting disturbingly close to an argument from Friends....

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
What do you mean I want a Jewish God? Lol

Substitute "religion" for moral relativism and you get the exact same conclusion, except I choose to look to a higher being instead of the idiocy of man.

You act as if my faith is blind. Do you actually believe that faith is blind by definition?

You're misreading me.

My point is that you will choose whatever faith/philosophy/ideology etc. that you like. You'll think you're right/justified/sensible. You'll use your knowledge and experience to settle on a choice and it will feel good. You'll defend it and you'll feel right. Your faith/beliefs/ideas are comforting to you. Doesn't matter what they are or what specific tenets you support.

What you believe in pleases you. What you do in life you do to satisfy yourself. Literally every action. Choosing to maintain a faith is but one of countless things you do every day that pleases you. You'll justify/rationalize/modify as needed to maintain what you've chosen. If you choose to disregard any of it, then that will be the right choice to make, and doing so will please you. Your present action will never be wrong because you've chosen it. And you chose it to satisfy yourself.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
My point is that you will choose whatever faith/philosophy/ideology etc. that you like. You'll think you're right/justified/sensible. You'll use your knowledge and experience to settle on a choice and it will feel good. You'll defend it and you'll feel right. Your faith/beliefs/ideas are comforting to you. Doesn't matter what they are or what specific tenets you support.

You're still not grasping. I don't choose to believe in God because it makes me all warm and fuzzy. I believe in God based on things I've experienced, mixed with very convincing Judaic arguments. Do I know God exists? Absolutely not. Do I think I'm right? For me and nobody else. I don't need to defend religion because it's not for everybody. Not every has the same experiences or the same kind of knowledge. Most people are ignorant and close minded, whether religious people or atheists. I'm not sure how you can say my beliefs are comforting to me. To state that implies I choose something based on comfort level, an argument I've addressed above.

What you believe in pleases you. What you do in life you do to satisfy yourself. Literally every action. Choosing to maintain a faith is but one of countless things you do every day that pleases you. You'll justify/rationalize/modify as needed to maintain what you've chosen. If you choose to disregard any of it, then that will be the right choice to make, and doing so will please you. Your present action will never be wrong because you've chosen it. And you chose it to satisfy yourself. [/B]

What I believe doesn't please me because I believe it based on what I perceive to be certain facts or at least, damning evidence. I don't "choose" to maintain my belief in god, it just is. If there was damning evidence that God didn't exist, I would accept that evidence all the same, so there's no need to rationalize anything. None of what you said has the least bit of accuracy to it. I think you made one generalized argument and stuck with it.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
Hitler and Stalin also believed in morals based on "common sense". LL, I don't need validation of a heaven, God, or afterlife to be happy or live my life. I'm not sure your example applies to most religious people.

It was their twisted opinion and, while for them it is common sense, for majority it is nonsense and atrocity. The simple truth is that, if person is evil by nature, he will be evil no matter what the believes are.
Obviously my example doesn't apply to most religious people because every person believes his own way and makes decisions according to their logic influenced by various factors. However, things happen that what is defined to be good by a book is not always good.
Here is one of examples with common scenario.
Boy and girl start dating each other. Their bond becomes so strong that they can't leave without each other and bless god for finding each other.
He happened to be jewish, she - muslim. I think there is no need to list all the possible consequences.
But aren't they both human? Aren't they both beings of the god? Why can't they be happy like everyone else?