Originally posted by Nephthys
Surprisingly, I agree. If we could not start insulting religion that would be great.
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
"Your eyes saw even the embryo of me, and in your book all its parts were down in writing" -Psalm 139:16^^ DNA?
Aren't DNA a set of codes/information that make up who we are as individuals? It seems very likely that our codes were writting by an intelligent source (God) rather than by an unitelligent source. If I went to a remote island and seen "Sidious66" carved on a stone, I wouldn't assume that the information got there by accident. Same way with DNA, I do not believe it happened to write itself, which is why I believe in a creator
If you do not believe in God then that is your choice and right. You probably have reasons why you don't believe in him, just like others, such as myself, have reasons why they do believe in him. But when you compare one's belief in God to believing in a invisible pink unicorn, you come off as insulting.
The unicorn is Dawkins' shorthand for the analogy coined by Bertrand Russel comparing belief in a non-physical non-observable non-interacting deity with an invisible teapot orbiting somewhere between the Earth and Mars, with the idea being that the inability to disprove said teapot puts it at the same level of ontological validation (that is, existence) as God. No one is mocking religion, so much as referencing arguments of more experienced rhetoricians (which rarely descend into the realm of outright mockery. Satire is a valid form of discourse, after all.)
Sidious, there are many and varied reasons why inscriptions into a stone and patterns in DNA are different cases of "information." Ultimately, though, there are billions upon billions of dollars that are based on your being wrong and scientists being right. In terms of real-world-proof, I'm going to stick with the method that has made people money by being effective and right.
I'd be happy to point you toward some sources that integrate Christian belief and the scientific fact of evolution into a consistent worldview, if you're interested.