DARTH POWER
^ This is exactly my point. What the heck was it Prequel or Remake?
It's functionally a reboot in that it takes existing characters and "resets" them,
but only to (and for) the audience; we are not looking at the same Captain Kirk in 2009 as people were in 1966, younger or otherwise. You shouldn't be calling
Ultimate Spider-Man a prequel to
The Amazing Spider-Man (comic, not film), for example, despite the fact that they technically take place in the same multiverse and have even had their own crossover. Likewise,
Ultimate introduces a new continuity and interpretation of the character's universe, but in the canon it runs alongside the mainstream MU.
Yes, Star Trek features a younger incarnation of the classic crew, but in a set of climates, relationships, and adventures that are not meant to relate congruently to whatever those histories - the life events of Spock Prime, etc. at that age - may have been in the original series. If your confusion derives from the fact that they share a continuity, even then we're working with future!Spock Prime in this timeline (which itself only exists because of events that occur in the far future of the original).
So perish these thoughts. It was a good movie that brought in a new audience (me, us) and revitalized the franchise, and probably helped motivate the Powers That Be to kickstart Star Wars again.
DARTH POWER
The rest of the arc for me was "Whatever.. When's Darth Maul coming back?"
also this.