LL, the fact that you chose to follow this hilariously incompetent clown instead of reading the discussion, says volumes about you. Again, amusing and sad at the same time.
Also little boy:
Since I never said anything resembling that
Originally posted by psmith81992
LL, the fact that you chose to follow this hilariously incompetent clown instead of reading the discussion, says volumes about you. Again, amusing and sad at the same time.Also little boy:
That is a straight answer. It means no. But no has no room for expansion. I know this is beyond you but that's ok.
It would be straight if it wasn't more b*llshit, Mr. Trainer.
Originally posted by psmith81992
Hahah I just realized that's Sorgo. I've never spoken to you, child but I do recall stories of how you were either banned from this forum, or got laughed off, both of which are consistent with your intelligence🙂
My story is one of redemption. Yours is of consistent failure.
Yes, I've had enemies, as we all have had. I also have a great deal of close friends that roam these forums.
Where's the U, Mr. Trainer?
Getting laughed at and getting banned from forums are not characteristics of unintelligence, which shouldn't even have to be explained.
My story is one of redemption. Yours is of consistent failure.
Getting laughed at and getting banned from forums are not characteristics of unintelligence, which shouldn't even have to be explained
Originally posted by The RenegadeYeah I'm getting that. Like I said, he's... odd. But it's raining out, so I'll bite.
Notice how you're not really getting a straight answer. Mr. Trainer has perfected this into rarely useful, outrageously common art.
His comment about the "law of averages" regarding poor people is pretty insightful to his paradigm. He doesn't think every poor person is a deadbeat, and he doesn't think every rich person has earned it, but on average they are and do.
And he seems to think that poor people are at the very least partially at fault for being poor. Circumstances of birth or an a-symmetric playing field be damned. He also seems to think that the reason Jews are rich is because they all work hard, circumstances of birth or a-symmetric playing field be damned. That one is either his supremacist views regarding Jews (irony overload), or his analogy for hard work=wealth, bar few exceptions.
Trainer also seems to be of the mindset that because hard work paid off for his family, that it must be a perfect solution to all, circumstances and unforeesable variables be damned. Essentially if you Train enough, you'll be wealthy. No possibility for any other outcome.
And he seems to think that poor people are at the very least partially at fault for being poor
He also seems to think that the reason Jews are rich is because they all work hard, circumstances of birth or a-symmetric playing field be damned. That one is either his supremacist views regarding Jews (irony overload), or his analogy for hard work=wealth, bar few exceptions.
Trainer also seems to be of the mindset that because hard work paid off for his family, that it must be a perfect solution to all, circumstances and unforeesable variables be damned. Essentially if you Train enough, you'll be wealthy. No possibility for any other outcome.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Palpatine isn't particularly interesting. Entertaining perhaps, but not that interesting or deep of a character.Vitiate is a bit more interesting imo just because theres so much we don't know about him.
lolplz
Palpatine is consistently referred to as a compelling aspect of the story, even by people who hate the prequels (I refer you to TheNostalgiaCritic or RedLetterMedia).
Has Vitiate ever received critical or public acclaim?
Of course he hasn't. Because no one cares about him and the only one who would dare say otherwise are TOR fanboys.
Palpatine > Vitiate, bro.
Originally posted by psmith81992That's true. But you followed up those assessments with your "law of averages" phrase. What did you mean with that?
That was in response to the claim that rich people don't get there through hard work. And yes, a LARGE number of people are lazy deadbeats. Just like a LARGE number of rich people didn't deserve their wealth. Hardly black and white isn't it?
Originally posted by psmith81992Did you? Page 1798, about 3/5 of the way down, you said, verbatim "And there are no poor Jews because Jews work their asses off." Why did you say that without any qualifier as to the amount? Do you think all Jews work harder than most non-Jews? Is that due to the circumstances of their birth, being more in to what you see as a superior race? Or is it because you equate "no poor[ness]" with hard work? And only hard work?
This is where your reading comprehension fails you. I mentioned Jews that I specifically knew. Immigrant Jews. SO that entire paragraph is one epic fail on Sorgo's level.
Originally posted by psmith81992You don't seem to be very good at communicating your thoughts and intentions. Keep it up, with practise it'll become easier.
And the failure to read and analyze properly is complete. Good try though.
Originally posted by The_Tempestlolplz
Palpatine is consistently referred to as a compelling aspect of the story, even by people who hate the prequels (I refer you to TheNostalgiaCritic or RedLetterMedia).
Because he's entertaining, not because he's interesting. His manic hamminess in RotS was the only bit of genuine energy and liveliness in the movie, something it badly needed. But its not as if anyone went 'man, I really want to know what makes him tick!'
Originally posted by The_Tempest
Has Vitiate ever received critical or public acclaim?Of course he hasn't. Because no one cares about him and the only one who would dare say otherwise are TOR fanboys.
Palpatine > Vitiate, bro.
Hmmmm, I'd say so. Even people who say the Jedi Knight campaign is flat say that it picks up when you go after the Emperor.
That's true. But you followed up those assessments with your "law of averages" phrase. What did you mean with that?
Did you? Page 1798, about 3/5 of the way down, you said, verbatim "And there are no poor Jews because Jews work their asses off." Why did you say that without any qualifier as to the amount? Do you think all Jews work harder than most non-Jews? Is that due to the circumstances of their birth, being more in to what you see as a superior race? Or is it because you equate "no poor[ness]" with hard work? And only hard work?
You don't seem to be very good at communicating your thoughts and intentions. Keep it up, with practise it'll become easier.
I'm still waiting on you to show me where exactly I said people get paid more because they work harder. And if you're referring to the "Jews work their asses off", even Janus didn't have a problem with that comment because I think you're the only one who didn't "get it". But that's ok, debating helps reading comprehension.
No, and we never will. Could get Ylvis to write a song about it.
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Did you? Page 1798, about 3/5 of the way down, you said, verbatim "[b]And there are no poor Jews because Jews work their asses off." Why did you say that without any qualifier as to the amount? Do you think all Jews work harder than most non-Jews? Is that due to the circumstances of their birth, being more in to what you see as a superior race? Or is it because you equate "no poor[ness]" with hard work? And only hard work?
[/B]
He didn't say that because, AGAIN, Mr. Trainer is full of sh*t. I don't buy anything he says now, after his massive display of horse crap. This is what I meant when I said this shattered his credibility. In the future, his intent will always be questioned due to his lying.
Lying is poisonous, as Mr. Trainer will find out.
Originally posted by NemeBro
Were we ever given a satisfactory answer on where the U went?
We never will.
He didn't say that because, AGAIN, Mr. Trainer is full of sh*t. I don't buy anything he says now, after his massive display of horse crap. This is what I meant when I said this shattered his credibility. In the future, his intent will always be questioned due to his lying.Lying is poisonous, as Mr. Trainer will find out.
Originally posted by psmith81992But you do think that people in the poverty demographic are at fault for being there? Amongst various factors, you feel that the most serious one is that the poor aren't doing enough to become, well... less poor? That, sure, the "fault" can lie with some of the douchebag rich people, and sure, the system isn't geared toward making everybody well off. But for the most part, on average, those with few resources only have themselves to blame for having so few resources?
I need to look at what I said. The whole response was regarding the sentiment that in general, poor people don't deserve to be poor and rich people don't deserve to be rich.That particular quote was a sarcastic response to Janus' "there are no poor jews". If you look further along in the argument, I qualified the answer with "Jews I know" and "my parents and their friends".
Or is it possible that your reading comprehension skills need work? There are books on that, you know.
I really need to you to clarify this for me. As you can probably tell, my reading comprehension skills kinda suck.