The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by ares8343,287 pages

Finally the answer to the question we have all been wondering! Why do the prequals suck?

YouTube video

I seriously lol'd.

Goodie, phazeddl didn't even provide an activation code for crysis 2.

Also:
http://dailyreckoning.com/the-true-products-of-quantitative-easing/

Don't go to grad school kids!

Dadudeman is almost as stupid as RJ these days. Its pretty sad, he used to be nice, now he's just dumb.

'The shield has shown no upper limit THEREFORE IT IS LIMITLESS!!!'

facepalm

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Same. But without the guilt. I was an unabashed Kim Possible fan. Drakken FTW.

Drakken was awesome. Hilariously incompetent, but awesome.

I always had a Perverse Sexual Lust for Shego.

Originally posted by Lucius
Drakken was awesome. Hilariously incompetent, but awesome.

I always had a Perverse Sexual Lust for Shego.

Not being a follower of mainstream television, this is what immediately came to mind:

Er, close enough.

Originally posted by Lucius

I always had a Perverse Sexual Lust for Shego.

You know, I kind of did too.

Actually thinking about it. All the major females in that show were pretty attractive, for cartoon characters*. Shego, Kim, and Bonnie.

*?

Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
You know, I kind of did too.

Actually thinking about it. All the major females in that show were pretty attractive, for cartoon characters*. Shego, Kim, and Bonnie.

*?

I thought so. Maybe it's the art style.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Dadudeman is almost as stupid as RJ these days. Its pretty sad, he used to be nice, now he's just dumb.

'The shield has shown no upper limit [b]THEREFORE IT IS LIMITLESS!!!'

facepalm [/B]

He's pulling the No Laser Fallacy? From RJ I expect it, but not DDM. Stop lieing, Neph!

His argument is that I can't prove the barrier has an upper limit, or that it can be broken through with physical attacks. By assuming that the barrier has a limit I am performing what he has pulled out of his ass invented as the 'Limits fallacy', the fallacy wherein you assume that something isn't infinately strong and unbrakable.

To which I am replying that its fvcking stupid to assume that something which has stopped nothing greater than literal smoke can stop mother****ing Superman when it hasn't shown capable of doing any such thing. I've also asked him why he thinks the barrier can't be broken with physical attacks to which he replied 'fvck you.' Finally I replied that if thats the way he wants to play it then Superman/Hancock punches the ground and vaporises planet Earth. Their strength has never been shown to have a limit, so by his logic, it doesn't have one.

WOOOOO what a comeback!! Dallas does it again. It's their title to lose now.

Damn, if they always play like that, shits really gonna hit the fan, huh?

It's the biggest comeback in NBA finals history. Alternatively, it's also the biggest choke.

Yeah. It must be really fvcking brutal to be that close to victory only to screw up and have it snatched from under you at the last moment. Ouch.

That's what you get for bragging in front of the other team's bench. Great job Wade!

Originally posted by Nephthys
His argument is that I can't prove the barrier has an upper limit, or that it can be broken through with physical attacks. By assuming that the barrier has a limit I am performing what he has pulled out of his ass invented as the 'Limits fallacy', the fallacy wherein you assume that something isn't infinately strong and unbrakable.

To which I am replying that its fvcking stupid to assume that something which has stopped nothing greater than literal smoke can stop mother****ing Superman when it hasn't shown capable of doing any such thing. I've also asked him why he thinks the barrier can't be broken with physical attacks to which he replied 'fvck you.' Finally I replied that if thats the way he wants to play it then Superman/Hancock punches the ground and vaporises planet Earth. Their strength has never been shown to have a limit, so by his logic, it doesn't have one.

Wait, where is this now?

Originally posted by Nephthys
His argument is that I can't prove the barrier has an upper limit, or that it can be broken through with physical attacks. By assuming that the barrier has a limit I am performing what he has pulled out of his ass invented as the 'Limits fallacy', the fallacy wherein you assume that something isn't infinately strong and unbrakable.

To which I am replying that its fvcking stupid to assume that something which has stopped nothing greater than literal smoke can stop mother****ing Superman when it hasn't shown capable of doing any such thing. I've also asked him why he thinks the barrier can't be broken with physical attacks to which he replied 'fvck you.' Finally I replied that if thats the way he wants to play it then Superman/Hancock punches the ground and vaporises planet Earth. Their strength has never been shown to have a limit, so by his logic, it doesn't have one.

This is why I gave up on the Movie vs. I understand preference and bias perfectly well, but the level of Harry Potter worship in there is astounding. It clouds judgement, if you will.

On an unrelated note, the comparative awesomeness of season 3 of The Clone Wars has been halted by my just having watched Count Dooku sip from a cup that was conjured in front of him out of a glowing green vapor.

Wha-?

So he's a wizard now too?