Originally posted by Lightsnake
It's a statement of fact that the authors are masturbating fanboys?
No, that's just my own opinion, I never actually said it was a fact...
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Mmmhmm, there goes your credibility.
You want to talk about credibility? Answer this question (Third time lucky), and then we'll discuss credibility:
When where the troopers in any way identified or adressed by their legion ID in the movie of RotS?
Originally posted by Lightsnake
And this is movie vs. movie?
So the first post said...
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Great, we can use EU pertaining to the movies to back it up, end of story. I believe those're the rules of the forum
That still does not mean that the EU reference is more canon than the movie reference though. It might 'back up' a point that the movie has already made, but it certainly does not add to or detract anything from the validity of the movie. Example: Vader striking down Obi-Wan in ANH. Regardless of what the novelization said, the movie did not show Obi-Wan having any great difficulty in defending himself against Vader (nor of Vader being able to best him) The movie did however, show Obi-Wan glance at Luke, give him a 'check this out' look, and then hold his saber to his face and close his eyes. That was clearly not a combative attitude, but one intentionally leaving him completely open to the attack. Given that he had been able to hold Vader off with no difficulty for the rest of the duel, there is no evidence to suggest that Vader could have over come him and struck him down, so the conclusion is that Obi-Wan let Vader strike him down, because he wanted to become one with the Force.