Rots Sids vs. Treya · Star Wars Versus Forum

Count Kent Restricted

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/member.php?s=&action=getinfo&userid=79224

Jonathan Mark Unknown

Originally posted by Xavius
What the hell is an IKC?

I believe he is referring to the fact that you act like IKC...

Count Kent Restricted

Not that he acts like him. He is IKC.

Jonathan Mark Unknown

Originally posted by Count Kent
Not that he acts like him. He is IKC.

No... because IKC is back and IKC is a much better debater than Xavius. If Xavius wasn't a friend of DarkC I might say more, but DarkC pwns so I'll say nothing.

Count Kent Restricted

I hate DarkC. He's a noob. And guess what. IKC was also friends with DarkC.

Xavius Restricted

Originally posted by Jonathan Mark
No... because IKC is back and IKC is a much better debater than Xavius. If Xavius wasn't a friend of DarkC I might say more, but DarkC pwns so I'll say nothing.

You can say what you want to me, but don't expect me to sit here and take your shit.

I'm all ears, JM.

Xavius Restricted

Originally posted by Count Kent
I hate DarkC. He's a noob. And guess what. IKC was also friends with DarkC.

You're the last person who should be calling anybody a Noob.

Jonathan Mark Unknown

Originally posted by Xavius
You can say what you want to me, but don't expect me to sit here and take your shit.
I'm all ears, JM.

I'd feel weird insulting a grown man who is an M.D and undoubtedly has a much better education than I do... what bothers me about you is you're rudeness.

e.l,m,t,i,(r k) Restricted

Originally posted by Count Kent
I hate DarkC. He's a noob. And guess what. IKC was also friends with DarkC.

STFU NOOB

Xavius Restricted

I wasn't being rude, I was being blunt. You decided to be rude first, actually.

If Xavius wasn't a friend of DarkC I might say more, but DarkC pwns so I'll say nothing.

What is that? If you want to say something to me, say it.

Jonathan Mark Unknown

Originally posted by Xavius
I wasn't being rude, I was being blunt. You decided to be rude first, actually.
What is that? If you want to say something to me, say it.

Ok let me put it this way... you're aggressive in you're arguments. In this way you are like IKC. Motoko didn't agree with you so you hammer her with unneeded insults. It's both annoying and stupid.

Great Vengeance Senior Member

Originally posted by Xavius

No, your wrong, and you hardly even make sense. Your an M.D. ? I very much doubt that.

Your analogy is virtually false, seeing as it does not fit into the perimeters of this argument and skepticism is not always the correct position within the Laws of debating.

My analogy is not false, because you have as much proof of saying 'Traya can instakill Sids' as you do of saying 'reindeers can fly'. True, skepticism isnt always correct, but you have to prove us wrong first. If you have no proof, then I am naturally correct because your the one that made a positive statement, Im just being skeptical.

I feel like I am repeating myself....

Because in itself, if you found the other side to be wrong, the skeptical side would basically be a flaw within itself to be correct without proper evidence. So, the skeptical side cannot be correct all the time or Skepticism would not be used.

This doesnt even make sense.

We are disagreeing here. It's that simple.

You are the one that made a positive statement, only you have no proof to back it up. Please dont waste my time, Im just repeating an established law of reason, if you argue against it than you are a fool.

Especially concerning this issue. Either side has proof so both sides stick to their opinions. That's rationally correct. Saying that the negatory side automatically throws over because of lack of proof is basically complete fallacy. Besides, you cannot challenge a position to proof if you do not contain proof within your own garrison. If you were to, it would be . . .

No, you dont have proof.

Traya has only shown her instakill ability works against some jedi masters, this is no proof that it would work on somone like Sidious who has considerably more knowledge and power.

I have no proof that you are wrong, but that doesnt matter. Unless you can back up your claim, your whole point is moot. I dont see why you cant get this through your head.

mikester Member

Originally posted by DE Luke
Show me where.Show me some 'real' proof.Oh right,there isn't!Only your illogical opinion!Who's the fool again?Oh yeah,you.

play battlefront 1. all the jedi can block missles

Legion_of_Maul Cool Joe.

what
not in BFII, and that is better than battlefront one.

e.l,m,t,i,(r k) Restricted

Originally posted by Legion_of_Maul
what
not in BFII, and that is better than battlefront one.

actaully they can block wrist launched rockets they've blocked jango's and boba's (trust me i've done this)

Legion_of_Maul Cool Joe.

yeah, but not full blow ultra rocket launchers, or just regular rocket launchers.

e.l,m,t,i,(r k) Restricted

Originally posted by Legion_of_Maul
yeah, but not full blow ultra rocket launchers, or just regular rocket launchers.

true... but when i'm playing a jedi or sith i just jump out the damn way

Legion_of_Maul Cool Joe.

haha, i don't get shot, my average kills per game is 348 because i jack up the reinforcements to 500, haha.

e.l,m,t,i,(r k) Restricted

Originally posted by Legion_of_Maul
haha, i don't get shot, my average kills per game is 348 because i jack up the reinforcements to 500, haha.

i dont need reinforcments to kill the entire army singlehandely i may be a noob at this forum but i am a god in bf2

Xavius Restricted

Originally posted by Jonathan Mark
Ok let me put it this way... you're aggressive in you're arguments. In this way you are like IKC. Motoko didn't agree with you so you hammer her with unneeded insults. It's both annoying and stupid.

What . . . Yah like her or something?

What is it that you do around here?