You mean, degradation ? What the hell do you call stating I am a moron ? Hypocrite much?
Typo. 😛 I was typing far too fast.
Okay...Im sick of arguing this with you.burden of proof fallacy
You *cannot* turn over the burden of proof on *me*, to do so would be logical fallacy
Ironically, you stating you've won the argument when both opinions are heed against each other is Logical Fallacy in itself. You must provide proof to destroy my claim. I must do the same with you. That's . . . the PURPOSE . . . OF . . . D E B A T I N G .
Hypocrite much?
See above. It is still my responsibility to disprove your arguments, which I have been doing. But you cannot say that the debate is a stalemate because the negative fails to offer proof. That is called, the negative proof fallacy.
Of course it does! You don't win! If you challenge my opinion with another opinion and you fail to provide proof, you're honestly winning zero, GV.
Well first of all, I meant that example as an example of conflicting opinions. BOTH conclusions you could make, are invalid because it is not backed by proper logical reasoning or evidence. This example is unrelated to a proper debate.And you are equating the Pizza and Steak with :
'Traya can use the instakill on Sidious'
'Traya cannot use the instakill on Sidious'
That is fallacious, and you know it.
Fine:
George can put Olives on his Pizza.
George cannot put Olives on his Pizza.
^ You're saying you challenging my opinion with one just as open and fallacious grants you a certain victory? Logical Fallacy. Right there.
BTW, The previous analogy I did is perfectly equate to the Traya debate.
I have put your theory to shit, your argument is plagued with assumptions and speculation.To say it is a stalemate, because I cannot *prove* you are wrong, is the burden of proof fallacy.
The burden of proof also has another slate to it's theory, GV.
"Can you prove she CANNOT use her instakill?"
Just like Futurama:
"Can you prove it won't happen?"
You put my theory to shit? You have no evidence! You perpetually dance around the point and try to fall my side of the debate (WITHOUT ARGUING THE POINT) so you won't have to put up a fight against my claim.
First of all, force grip, push and drain doesnt instakill like Kreias move does. The entire problem of this, is you are just assuming Kreia can wave her hand and Sidious simply dies. That is a ridiculous assumption, being Sidious is far more knowledgable and powerful than some jedi masters.
Why are you ignoring what you said? You asked me "When have you seen a force power that couldn't be blocked?"
I answered you.
And, what the f*ck? How do you know Sidious possesses more knowledge than these Masters? You can't assume that. Hypocrite much, GV?
Kreia could force drain Sidious and he would die. What could stop her? How do you even KNOW he possesses knowledge of how to deal with that? It's a ridiculous assumption to assume that by the time of RotS he had knowledge of the Instakill. He would have used it if he knew it and there is no evidence that he can block it. That simple.
Even if they couldnt block it, your missing the point, where is the proof that *Sidious* cant block it? You have absolutely none.Kreias instakill, once again, is an unknown, that hasnt been properly defined yet, so we cant apply it in the context of this fight.
Three force sensitives, who have spent most of their life studying the guarding side of the force. The protective side of the force FELL to Traya's instakill.
Sidious, whom practices OFFENSIVE techniques and not very many defensive ones, is more vulnerable to this attack.
You seem to think Kreias ability has unlimited power, because you said 'it instantly kills' and expect that to apply to all situations. This is absurd. You have absolutely no proof or even support that it would work in all situations, all we have is that one instance it was used, when those jedi masters were killed. So now anything that is capable of killing is now an 'instakill'? Do you see the absurdity of your logic?
Wait . . . Did I say it could apply to all situations? You assuming again, GV? Yup.
Traya killed three Force Sensitive Humans INSTANTLY.
What would be the trouble with ONE force sensitive Human? Especially RotS Sidious, whom has alot of knowledge but not as much by that time.
Also, just an observation, if Kreias 'instakill' works in all situations then why didnt she use it to defeat the Exile? Why didnt she use it to defeat Sion & Nihilus when they attacked her on Malachor? Its 'instakill' right? Infallible?
Works in all situations? Once again, who said that?
She didn't want to kill the Exile, she didn't WANT to kill Sion and she may have not possessed the knowledge of Instakill by the time Nihilus and Sion betrayed her. Either that or she wanted to use them later on, seeing as she is so manipulative.
That much is obvious.
Your awful stupidity is obvious.