sithsaber408
Intelligently Designed
Well X,... I guess I'll have my humble pie in slices. 😛
It broke 200mil (internationaly, of course), but just barely.
To answer you, I do know what it takes to make a film a financial success, and what the studios look at. (and the difference between domestic and international sucess, and any combination therof.)
I'm in no way, shape, or form even trying to compare Superman Returns to POTC2.
One broke records all over the place and was a huge hit, the other is doing mariginally well (were it not for an inflated budget) and is limping along.
To me though, it won't be a failure if it cracks 200mil here, and makes another 50-60 mil abroad.
It went up against good competition, and wasn't marketed very well at all.
Maybe the positve reviews from established sources (TIME, Larry King, Premier, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, etc..) actually hurt it, since people seem to distrust them and shower box office on whatever the critics cite as ho-hum action movies. (see Dead Man's Chest, Xmen: Last Stand.)
In any event, if the film can make back most of its costs in theatres, then dvd's will provide the studios profits.
I am of the mind that a sequel is still coming, and that if they can make it for under 200 mil, then the studio will turn a better profit in 2009.
An article in Premier describing last years b.o. takes had this scale:
10-30 mil (bomb)
30-50 mil (misfire)
50-75 mil (sleeper)
100 mil+ (hit)
200 mil+ (blockbuster)
While you have to take in account budgets, I would say that Superman Returns is a hit, and may still make it to blockbuster status.
Currently, it needs another 36mil in the U.S. to do so:
Domestic: $164,316,103 68.1%
+ Foreign: $77,000,000 31.9%
= Worldwide: $241,316,103