DE Sidious & Ludo Kressh vs. Marka Ragnos & Naga Sadow

Started by Escape8114 pages
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Escape, I don't know how you are sitting here telling me Lightsnake telling me "Oh well emailed me and told me blah blah blah", is a canon source.. I mean I don't expect much from a star wars forums but there is a fine line between bullshit and fact.

And you cross it time and time again.

These are emails from the authors who created your freaking Ancient Sith. The ones who know more about them than you.

I DID post the exact email, moron. Like I said, the originals are gone as the topics they were in got purged.
Who says they agree with every word I say? I thought Kun was weaker than the Ancients.

And these questions you sent to Kevin, what are they? See, you're a liar, so you'll excuse my skepticism. Maybe you missed it, but I posted scans. And from what Nebaris posted in TEXT from DE, this should practically be done.

Sorry, baby, but I posted scans, I've proven my argument and I'm afraid I'm done with you, you lose. Unlike your Wiki-which is generally accurate- fallacy, I don't see one place on Wookiepedia where it says Marka died of Old Age, it's just been assumed.

See where I posted the emails? Mind telling me how I faked those return addresses? It's funny, Ragnos boy

We see him use the tools and canon information says he used the tools to do what he did. If he didn't need them, he wouldn't use 'em

Originally posted by Lightsnake
I DID post the exact email, moron. Like I said, the originals are gone as the topics they were in got purged.
Who says they agree with every word I say? I thought Kun was weaker than the Ancients.

And these questions you sent to Kevin, what are they? See, you're a liar, so you'll excuse my skepticism. Maybe you missed it, but I posted scans. And from what Nebaris posted in TEXT from DE, this should practically be done.

Sorry, baby, but I posted scans, I've proven my argument and I'm afraid I'm done with you, you lose. Unlike your Wiki-which is generally accurate- fallacy, I don't see one place on Wookiepedia where it says Marka died of Old Age, it's just been assumed.

See where I posted the emails? Mind telling me how I faked those return addresses? It's funny, Ragnos boy

Wookiepedia doesn't say Ragnos died of old age? What a brilliant liar you are.. I'm reading it now, and answers.com and Wikipedia. And I did email Kevin, and I will show you the scans unlike you. I wasn't around for your emails but i'm supposed to take your word for it? No thanks Sidious fanboy.

Originally posted by Escape81
And you cross it time and time again.

These are emails from the authors who [B]created your freaking Ancient Sith. The ones who know more about them than you. [/B]

WHERE are these emails for the last time?

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ragnos

the details of his century-long reign are few, although his death marked the end of the high point of the Sith Empire, despite his reluctance to continue expansion. Immediately following his funeral, a schism erupted between the leaders of the Sith, and further events led to a major war with the Galactic Republic and, because the schism was never healed, ultimately the end of their interstellar empire.

His death resulted in the rise of another Sith Lord, Naga Sadow, shortly before the Great Hyperspace War. His spirit lingered in the Valley of the Dark Lords on Korriban, long after his death.

There is nothing about old age in that article and it was debated among Wookiepedia users whether to add it or not...it was vetoed because no canon source stated that's how he died...watch, I'll add 'he died of old age'...watch it get taken down

And do you have the internet version of selective hearing? I POSTED THE EMAILS IN THE OTHER TOPIC

You weren't around? Big deal! The Antediluvians, Nai and Escape WERE...the fact that Nai is accepting them means NOTHING to you? That guy is a vicious cynic and he attacks ANY source viciously until he sees proof, you REALLY think, since you cling to Nai's coattails so much I could put anything past him?

In which thread did you shut this Nai up exactly? No really I'd like to know... I'm assuming Nai is Borbarad, who has provided plenty of good posts to counter your Sidious nonsense..
http://www.answers.com/topic/marka-ragnos

Yeah, and you missed all my counter arguments. We've both given ground..

And oh, answers.com is sooooo much better than the Star Wars Wiki! Which conveniently states Marka Ragnos dying of old age= fanon

ohhh I see, so the more canon source is the one that best fits your argument. Bravo lightsnake, Bravo.

I'm sorry: I trust the Star Wars Wiki more than I trust answers.com, especially as it states on Marka's page that there is no source for him having died of old age

Originally posted by Lightsnake
I'm sorry: I trust the Star Wars Wiki more than I trust answers.com, especially as it states on Marka's page that there is no source for him having died of old age

I'm sure you trust it more because it helps your argument.. Obviously. But rest assured, that was one of the questions I emailed Anderson with, so we will see. There is no record of Ragnos ever getting killed either, but of course that hurts your argument so that doesn't make sense right?

What were the other questions, now I'm curious.

I'm not saying a thing about how Ragnos died. I'm just calling into question some of these irritating queries

I asked him who was the most powerful sith lord of all time, who HE thought was the most powerful, did Ragnos die of old age, did the ancient sith need their amulets and all that or not. I also explained that that 50-50 go to Palpatine/Ragnos in terms of most powerful, and to clear that up.. That's about it.

Give it up, I asked him the same stuff. If you ever get a response, he'll give you the same exact answer he gave me, because more ore less, that's EXACTLY what I asked him.

he's gonna tell you he can't say on some issues...he just put Palpatine and Exar on the top and said he couldn't truly compare power levels

I just read your email Lightsnake, go to the other forum. If you interpret that as "Kun and Palpy are at the top", then you are mentally unstable.
I won't even repeat that it wasn't written by Kevin since "kevin has been busy writing".

And this is all before I ask for a more definitive scan, like the to and from in the email address, not just the text which is incredibly easy to manipulate(not saying you did). I know all about aol so that's very far from conclusive, but that doesn't even matter since the email doesn't prove anything.

Ummm, no, it said ;sorry for the long wait, Kevin's been busy' and then
anderzone told me Kevin replied and they were gonna give me his responses. This is just sour grapes, you whining and sobbing and refusing to accept what's there. It's hilarious.

I'm gonna get Venificus down here to verify what I've said is true as he's seen the emails...just to shut you up. And Escape verified it...and Nai accepts it...but screw them, hm?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Ummm, no, it said ;sorry for the long wait, Kevin's been busy' and then
anderzone told me Kevin replied and they were gonna give me his responses. This is just sour grapes, you whining and sobbing and refusing to accept what's there. It's hilarious.

I'm gonna get Venificus down here to verify what I've said is true as he's seen the emails...just to shut you up. And Escape verified it...and Nai accepts it...but screw them, hm?

What's hilarious is the "he told me blah blah blah but it isn't conveniently in the scans". That is a riot, and so is your whining and projection. But sure, get someone to verify your bullshit, even Nai will do. Until then shut up, you're getting annoying.

It's ok, Td...those grapes were probably sour anyways

Again with the td insult. It's ok lightsnake. The fact that you're crying over lack of evidence after you've tried so hard, is admirable.. I'm sure the respected members will start believing you once you stop trying so hard.

I'm putting you on ignore, you whiny little brat