Exar Kun vs. Yoda

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Hmm lets see.. Keywords are our friends.. Things like "Yoda could possibly block the amulet blast". That indicates that he might able to or he might not. "Yoda could possibly dodge the blast". That implies that Yoda could possibly dodge it or not. Now when you have 2 saber gods going at it, possibly stalemating or what not, a piece of metal using sith alchemy could be the deciding factor could it not Nai? Logic anybody?

Lmao. Or the deciding factor could be that one of the two had 900 years to amass force knowledge, multiple times the lightsaber combat experience, destroyed Dark Siders before, basically defeated two Sith Lords in direct confrontation and was able to dodge attacks by three Jedi at once effortless, crushed entire armies and kept an army of nice duellists under his belt.

But nooooo...the deciding factor must be the Amulet which is possibly able to floor Yoda for 2 seconds if Kun would be ever able to hit him. Especially since I totally see Kun, with his two handed fighting style, take away one hand from his saber while having Yoda rain down strikes on his defences - when Yoda is able to simply avoid Kun's lightsaber attacks without even a need to parry them - unless of course you want to tell me that Kun can aim more attacks at Yoda than 3 Jedi including one Vaapad master. Hm.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
The funnier thing is that I never said Simus was powerful as a head, as opposed to him being a full body, so the fact that you can't acknowledge the fact that I never said that, is humorous in itself. So you don't to show me your midichlorian logic as you're stating the obvious. So before you want to start teaching logical deduction, start learning reading comprehension.

Maybe you should start learning some reading comprehension or start keeping in mind what you write down yourself. You said Simus as a head was still powerful and I've shown you why this clearly couldn't have been the case. So what ?

Originally posted by Borbarad
Lmao. Or the deciding factor could be that one of the two had 900 years to amass force knowledge, multiple times the lightsaber combat experience, destroyed Dark Siders before, basically defeated two Sith Lords in direct confrontation and was able to dodge attacks by three Jedi at once effortless, crushed entire armies and kept an army of nice duellists under his belt.

But nooooo...the deciding factor must be the Amulet which is possibly able to floor Yoda for 2 seconds if Kun would be ever able to hit him. Especially since I totally see Kun, with his two handed fighting style, take away one hand from his saber while having Yoda rain down strikes on his defences - when Yoda is able to simply avoid Kun's lightsaber attacks without even a need to parry them - unless of course you want to tell me that Kun can aim more attacks at Yoda than 3 Jedi including one Vaapad master. Hm.

One day you'll have to learn the difference between COULD and MUST. Perhaps you would like to quantify Yoda's knowledge? Hmm? When did he defeat 2 sith lords at once(I don't remember it therefore I'm curious"? And Kun's amulet could floor Yoda for 2 seconds, could do nothing, or could drive a hole through him. Unless of course Yoda is made from different material than the sith wyrm? You do realize that the only part of the force attack is the channeling right? Once the blast leaves the amulet, there is very little Yoda can do. Let's assume he can't destroy the amulet, he's going to withstand a blast that killed a wyrm? Let me guess Nai, Ulic's amulet=Kun's amulet? They do the same thing? Same scale? Hm..

Yoda can simply avoid Kun's attacks without the need to parry them? Oh, like he did against Sidious, like he did against Dooku, people thought to be inferior to Kun in saber combat. Hm....

Originally posted by Borbarad
Maybe you should start learning some reading comprehension or start keeping in mind what you write down yourself. You said Simus as a head was still powerful and I've shown you why this clearly couldn't have been the case. So what ?

Or perhaps I said they saw his power when he remained alive as a head, and respected him? hmm

These are the SITH we're talking about?
Respecting someone for power alone wouldn't amount to grief at his death

Originally posted by Lightsnake
These are the SITH we're talking about?
Respecting someone for power alone wouldn't amount to grief at his death

uh what? What are you droning about now lightsnake?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
One day you'll have to learn the difference between COULD and MUST.

One day you'll have to learn the difference between "debate" and "sophism".

Perhaps you would like to quantify Yoda's knowledge? Hmm?

What about "everything available" ?

When did he defeat 2 sith lords at once(I don't remember it therefore I'm curious"?

When did I say he defeated 2 Sith Lords at once ? What did you write about reading comprehension, troll ?

You do realize that the only part of the force attack is the channeling right?

Oh this is great. Finally we've found somebody that can exactly explain the fundamental workings of Sith amulets. They just channel power ? Great...

Once the blast leaves the amulet, there is very little Yoda can do.

Except dodge it, deflect it, redirect it ? Didn't I allready mention we've seen minor Jedi moving faster than blaster bolts. Until you have proof that Kun's amulet blasts exceed the velocity of blaster bolts you have some problem here.

Let's assume he can't destroy the amulet, he's going to withstand a blast that killed a wyrm?

Nice logic there. DE Luke could withstand fire from an AT-AT that vaporized a generator building in ESB. We've seen quite some people deflecting fire from space ships that normally would have left some nice chasms in the ground with their bare hands. I wonder what this "argument" is good for...

Let me guess Nai, Ulic's amulet=Kun's amulet? They do the same thing? Same scale? Hm..

No of course not. Just because it's stated that they are similar they don't have to be similar.

Yoda can simply avoid Kun's attacks without the need to parry them? Oh, like he did against Sidious, like he did against Dooku, people thought to be inferior to Kun in saber combat. Hm....

Have a close look at the duel between Dooku and Yoda in AotC - there isn't a single strike that Yoda did have to parry. He dodges most attacks and the strikes he "parries" were missing him anyway. Same thing is happening in his duel against Sidious.
And yes...sorry...EU says he was able to dodge the attacks of three Jedi effortless and given what he shows in the films I don't know why I should doubt this statement.

What about "everything available" ?

When did I say he defeated 2 Sith Lords at once ? What did you write about reading comprehension, troll ?

Except dodge it, deflect it, redirect it ? Didn't I allready mention we've seen minor Jedi moving faster than blaster bolts. Until you have proof that Kun's amulet blasts exceed the velocity of blaster bolts you have some problem here.

And of course, we only have proof of DE Luke being able to block something considerably powerful. But then again, the energy of Kun's blasts are amplified by his anger.

Everything else makes sense so I don't argue with it.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
What exactly is everything available Nai hmm? There's a difference between "everything", and "everything available". I would assume that doesn't count for something that was unavailable?

Every single force technique Jedi have shown so far. Since I don't want to type it down just have a look at the core / universal and light powers sited at your beloved wikipedia.

Oh, so everybody on this forum uses the term "Troll" freely when theyre angry? Explain how I'm a troll when I've been in this thread from day 1.

No. I use the term "troll" for people who think they are the epitome of maturity and debating ability despite the fact that they manage to do 100 posts per day in an online forum and fail to use some logic on every single occassion. Yes, sir...you're a troll.

Perhaps you should learn the concept of logic before preaching it, and while you're at it I was asking to show me where Yoda defeated 2 sith lords, since I don't recall it. If you wrote it great, if you didn't let me know, but don't let your apparent anger let you use terminology out of context. Thanks.

Damn. I have learned the concept of logic - something that is clearly beyond somebody who bases "logical deduction" on "opinions". And "anger" ? Sorry...I'm rather amused by your complete inability to keep your own statements in mind, kid.

"When did he defeat 2 sith lords at once...?"
Your own words. I'm sorry...should I have missinterpretated the "at once" as "at the same time" ? Then I'm asking myself what would be the right interpretation in this case.
Aside of this Yoda defeated Dooku twice (forcing him to retreat) and technically defeated Sidious too (stalemate because of position advantage from Sidious). And since he knows about the rule of two it's pretty likely that he had some confrontation with one of the Sith of Bane's order in his past.

Ah, so you have proof that blaster bolts=Kun's amulet blasts?

Excuse me. Did I start with the illogical reasoning here that, because Kun could blast through a Sith wyrm, he would be able to blast through a force user when we saw that said force user was able to block massive amounts of force energy ? I think that was you.

Considering the fact that Kun can unleash them in terms of his rage multiplying 10 times, 100 times, 100,000 times? Unless of course you think it's the same powered amulet blast even as his anger is multiplied. Right Nai.

Kun's anger increases with every pulse of the amulet. How often do you think he would be able to shoot at Yoda, huh ? Once ? Then we won't have any "multiplication".
Aside of this we have seen people blocking broadsides from a Stardestroyer. So until you show me that a blast of Kun's amulet desintegrates some cubic-kilometere of a planatary surface I have to say that the blasts are blockable. It's not as if Kun carries the firepower of a Death Star around his wrist.

And of course, we only have proof of DE Luke being able to block something considerably powerful. But then again, the energy of Kun's blasts are amplified by his anger.

Wow. Amplification by anger trumps everything. As we've seen Kun somehow did manage not to blast through a temple wall using his amulet. Even when he's angry the amulet doesn't cause destruction to a scale that "conventional" weapons in the SW universe were able to do. Did he bring down an entire building with an amulet blast ? Did he tear some mountain apart ? No. We've seen people able to deflect or dissipate energy of weapons able to do exactly this - so what ?

By the things displayed so far, Yoda can cause much more destruction with his own force abilities than Kun can cause using his amulets.

Originally posted by Borbarad
[B]Every single force technique Jedi have shown so far. Since I don't want to type it down just have a look at the core / universal and light powers sited at your beloved wikipedia.

No. I use the term "troll" for people who think they are the epitome of maturity and debating ability despite the fact that they manage to do 100 posts per day in an online forum and fail to use some logic on every single occassion. Yes, sir...you're a troll.

Hmm last time I checked Nai, I'm not a troll, so please get your terminology correct. When did I think I was the epitome of maturity, and debating ability? I think I can debate better than others, considering my not so extensive SW knowledge. 100 posts a day? Hardly, but thanks for the baseless accusations/personal attacks.

Damn. I have learned the concept of logic - something that is clearly beyond somebody who bases "logical deduction" on "opinions". And "anger" ? Sorry...I'm rather amused by your complete inability to keep your own statements in mind, kid.

"When did he defeat 2 sith lords at once...?"
Your own words. I'm sorry...should I have missinterpretated the "at once" as "at the same time" ? Then I'm asking myself what would be the right interpretation in this case.
Aside of this Yoda defeated Dooku twice (forcing him to retreat) and technically defeated Sidious too (stalemate because of position advantage from Sidious). And since he knows about the rule of two it's pretty likely that he had some confrontation with one of the Sith of Bane's order in his past.

Excuse me. Did I start with the illogical reasoning here that, because Kun could blast through a Sith wyrm, he would be able to blast through a force user when we saw that said force user was able to block massive amounts of force energy ? I think that was you.

Please list me the people that were known to block huge amounts of force energy, besides DE Luke. And by your calculation again, blast bolts=amulet blasts. While you're at it, please explain to me what great destruction Yoda is going to cause in a 1 on 1 duel, since Yoda is clearly the uber god and can tool Kun in no time.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Would this include amulet blasts Nai? Hmm... Or not?

Would this include absorbation and dissipation of force energy (such as Kun's amulet blasts) ? Yes ! Thanks...

An "Internet troll" or "Forum Troll" is a person who posts outrageous message to bait people to answer. Forum Troll delights in sowing discord on the forums. A troll is someone who inspires flaming rhetoric, someone who is purposely provoking and pulling people into flaming discussion. Flaming discussions usually end with name calling and a flame war

Oh sorry. Given that you really have a definition for the term "troll" you aren't a troll but a nerd. Thanks for clarification and the nice self-ownage. Great...rofl...

Hmm last time I checked Nai, I'm not a troll, so please get your terminology correct.

Sorry nerd...I don't have the time to get my "internet forum insult terminology" correct and since I don't care about things like this I can't care less. Last time I checked a "troll" was some sort of fantasy creature with a lack of brainpower - a description that fits you quite well.

When did I think I was the epitome of maturity, and debating ability?

When telling other people that they don't have an argument while presenting no arguments yourself. When telling people you use "logical deduction" and base the entire "deduction" on some opinion. Or when you consequantly told Lightsnake that he is 15 years old...oh yes...

100 posts a day? Hardly, but thanks for the baseless accusations/personal attacks.

Oh. Math isn't your favourite subject either, hmm ? Have a look on your profile. It says you have registered yourself at July 13th, correct ? And since then (11 days) you have posted 1015 times. Damn. Can it be that this means you have done more than 92 posts here per day ? Yes ? When I last checked (before posting) it were 1000 post on 10 days which would be - damn it ? - 100 posts per day ? Thanks...

THis coming from someone who has repeatedly shown the inability to read and understand certain posts.

No. This is coming from the guy that curpstombs you with every posts while you just seem to forget what you have typed here 10 minutes ago. Can that be ? Let me see...

I base logical deduction on opinions? Wow Nai where'd you come up with that one. I'm glad this isn't reality according to Nai.

I'm glad this is reality and not Darth Sexy's interpretation of it. So let me just quote yourself:

Sama you seem to be capable of deductive reasoning, so let me ask you something..

Yoda stalemated a not so powerful Sidious, while Kun I gues "tooled" Vodo, who was considered to be Yoda's equal or superior(this reading from previous threads). Kun also displayed far more force abilities while Sidious and Yoda displayed far less. Deductive reasoning states that Yoda wasn't able to beat a somewhat old Sidious in a saber duel(granted he probably would have if it lasted longer), what makes you think he can contend with a YOUNGER, more POWERFUL lightsaber prodigy who has the secrets of the ancient sith, and had no equal in his time?

There. So called "deductive reasoning" based on the opinion / assumption that Vodo is Yoda's equal / superior. Thanks for owning yourself again, dude.

You're amused by my inability to keep my own statements in mind? Like what, telling you to read a post before responding? Telling you you're angry when you constantly throw out the retarded "kid" personal attacks? Brilliant, simply brilliant. You're right, you're not angry, you're amused..

Yes. Kids are always amusing me and I use to call them "kids".

Wow Nai, notice how you said he defeated two sith lords at once?

Wow, Darth Sexy. Notice how I didn't say that...to quote myself:
"basically defeated two Sith Lords in direct confrontation". Where do you see the "at once" here ? Is it typed down in invisible letters to fool anybody else except you ? Or can it be that somebody here just doesn't want to look as dumb as he is ? Ups...

Again, perhaps you should do less preaching and focus more on what you type. There's a difference between being superior to Dooku and Sidious while not defeating them, and defeating two sith lords at the same time. Forgive me if I had no idea what context your ridiculous text was in.

There's a difference between me typing that he "basically defeated two Sith Lords" and your interpretation of this words that he "clearly defeated two Sith Lords at once". Maybe you should do less preaching and focus on what you read instead so that I don't have to destroy the BS comments you make up to cover up your own lack of reading comprehension.

Please list me the people that were known to block huge amounts of force energy, besides DE Luke.

Where did DE Luke block "force energy", huh ? We were talking about "normal" energy and the list is pretty long.

And by your calculation again, blast bolts=amulet blasts. While you're at it, please explain to me what great destruction Yoda is going to cause in a 1 on 1 duel, since Yoda is clearly the uber god and can tool Kun in no time.

Irrelevant missdirection. You were talking about the destructive abilities of the amulet blasts and I did show you that we've seen people blocking far more destructive things with their force powers. So thanks for talking out of your ass again.

Yoda causing destruction ? Let me see: He and his "equal" Sidious destroyed basically the entire Senate chamber during their fight. Yoda can lift enormous objects with the force and tear down mountain tops and - according to Mace - cause, control and stop avalanches. Let me think what kind of destruction Yoda could cause...perhabs collapse a building they're fighting in on Kun or pimpslap him with the arena ?

May I point out once more that all you've said in favor for Kun so far is that "Kun has his amulets" and draw your attention to the fact that multiple people told you several pages ago that you have been outdebated already ? But well...what should we expect from somebody who is To Dumb To Die and calls himself "Darth Sexy" ?

Geez, Nai's in a vicious debate and it's not with me....I feel like I've been cheated on

[QUOTE=6980908]Originally posted by Borbarad

Your novel is so boring and uninspiring that I decided to delete it entirely in my post. So wait, because of your inability to comprehend the term "troll", I'm a nerd who pwned myself? Way to live in reality Nai, apparently youre NOT an imbecile for throwing out baseless insults/accusations and making yourself retarded. Now the rest of your nonsense was more petty and immature personal attacks so yawn at that. Um who told me that I was outdebated here, or is this another one of those "reality according to Nai" things? Weird.. You certainly do have more knowledge about SW than me, I don't dispute that, nor do I throw a hissy fit like an angry nerd. So do a lot of others on this forum, however you look like an angry child, throwing out insults, and bickering pointlessly when I could care less about how angry you are..

'But well...what should we expect from somebody who is To Dumb To Die and calls himself "Darth Sexy"?'

lmao 😆

That was the best burn I've ever seen on this forum.

Actually that was one of the dumbest things I've seen. But rest assured, I don't expect much from the majority of the people here, especially when anger rears its ugly head. It is amusing on my side reading crap like that though, knowing people get angry over little things, and i'm sure it is as equally amusing for others.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Your novel is so boring and uninspiring that I decided to delete it entirely in my post.

Translation: "Damn. What a total smackdown. I'm totally inable to say anything against it because you are perfectly right."

So wait, because of your inability to comprehend the term "troll", I'm a nerd who pwned myself?

No. Because you can give me a three sentence definition of the term "troll" as it's used in internet communities, you have proven yourself to be a nerd. Somebody who cares about certain interests (online forum terms) more than about skills useful in a social setting. "Geek" would be some other description that fits I guess...

Way to live in reality Nai, apparently youre NOT an imbecile for throwing out baseless insults/accusations and making yourself retarded.

I love how facts can be "baseless accusations". Sorry...you post here more than 90 times a day. Fact. Anything to say ? No ? Good.

Now the rest of your nonsense was more petty and immature personal attacks so yawn at that.

Lovely how you're ignoring my arguments...I guess you can't simply answer, correct ? Thanks.

Um who told me that I was outdebated here, or is this another one of those "reality according to Nai" things?

No. This is the real reality where people like Motoko Sama, Swirly Girl, Arcana, Generic Hero and aside of them Lightsnake and myself told you you're arguing a lost cause. So ?

Weird.. You certainly do have more knowledge about SW than me, I don't dispute that, nor do I throw a hissy fit like an angry nerd. So do a lot of others on this forum, however you look like an angry child, throwing out insults, and bickering pointlessly when I could care less about how angry you are..

Yes. You care so little about how angry I am that you constantly ignore my comments how I'm laughing my ass off because of you poor debating attempts instead of "being angry". Why should I be angry - because I'm wasting my time with you ?
Aside of this you did throw out nice little insults at various persons here so don't play the innocent victim.

@Lightsnake

Geez, Nai's in a vicious debate and it's not with me....I feel like I've been cheated on

Lmao. What can I say ?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Yeah, Nai really owns.

😛

Originally posted by Borbarad
Translation: "Damn. What a total smackdown. I'm totally inable to say anything against it because you are perfectly right."

No. Because you can give me a three sentence definition of the term "troll" as it's used in internet communities, you have proven yourself to be a nerd. Somebody who cares about certain interests (online forum terms) more than about skills useful in a social setting. "Geek" would be some other description that fits I guess...

I love how facts can be "baseless accusations". Sorry...you post here more than 90 times a day. Fact. Anything to say ? No ? Good.

Lovely how you're ignoring my arguments...I guess you can't simply answer, correct ? Thanks.

No. This is the real reality where people like Motoko Sama, Swirly Girl, Arcana, Generic Hero and aside of them Lightsnake and myself told you you're arguing a lost cause. So ?

Yes. You care so little about how angry I am that you constantly ignore my comments how I'm laughing my ass off because of you poor debating attempts instead of "being angry". Why should I be angry - because I'm wasting my time with you ?
Aside of this you did throw out nice little insults at various persons here so don't play the innocent victim.

@Lightsnake

Lmao. What can I say ?

😛

Yes Nai, we know the mentality of the common internet user. As usual, anybody who is making the personal insults, and fuming over comments, is NOT angry, but "laughing his ass off". You don't need to convince me of that one Nai.. I get 5-10 people a day telling me they're really laughing while going apeshit over something.. On another note, I love how your stupidity and inability to comprehend simple words makes you normal, while I'm a geek for pointing out your inability to comprehend the term troll. That was truly priceless. On another note, nobody was telling me I was arguing a lost cause, because if you actually read this thread and not made a fool out of yourself acting like an immature little child everytime I accidentally diminish your favorite character, you'd see that I was arguing with lightsnake over a quote, and the quote was accurate. Nobody has told me I was outdebated, nobody, so making shit up to make yourself feel better doesn't really work here does it? On another note, which is it... Do I post 100 times a day or 90? Or maybe 75 the next time you write a testy little rebuttal full of your indignant ramblings? And please don't point out how you keep wasting your time, because you make the effort to write full novels about how I fail to use "Logic". Let me make it clear to you that I have shown that I can debate, and I debate based on what I know. If there is something I am NOT familiar with, that doesn't make me illogical, so don't come here spewing your "logical argument" crap because it has no bearing on what's going on. And a total smackdown? I've had you rant on incoherently like a little child about how I'm a nerd, illogical, etc. If anything is funny, it is just that. I chuckle to myself how angry internet kids get.

Since when've you shown you were able to debate? I haven't seen one member of this forum that can stand you.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Yes Nai, we know the mentality of the common internet user.
As usual, anybody who is making the personal insults, and fuming over comments, is NOT angry, but "laughing his ass off". You don't need to convince me of that one Nai.. I get 5-10 people a day telling me they're really laughing while going apeshit over something..

Wow. I love how you fail to see that I don't have anything to be angry about. Face it: I've destroyed all of your so called "arguments" and exposed you to ridicule. If anybody has a reason to be angry here, it's you. If anybody has a reason here to laugh, it's me. See ? It's really that easy.

On another note, I love how your stupidity and inability to comprehend simple words makes you normal, while I'm a geek for pointing out your inability to comprehend the term troll. That was truly priceless.

No. Priceless is the term that can be used to descripe that somebody wants to point out an "inability to comprehend a term" and than does anything to perfectly fit his own description of the word "troll". The word "priceless" can also be used for your attempts to prolong this debate with irrelevant posts. To quote yourself: "If you don't have to say anything about the topic, keep your mouth shut."

On another note, nobody was telling me I was arguing a lost cause,

No, of course not.

Arcana:
"Really Sexy (tdtd) with every post you make you climb one more rung down the latter of intelligence. At this point you must be nearing the bottom, since you have quite a few posts." (page 16)

"You are in denial... I suggest you get out." (page 17)

Swirly Girl:
"To be honest tdtd, you've effectively been out debated." (page 16)

Generic Hero:
"Sexy, you're clinging to logical deduction when factual evidence (From the mouth of the co-creator himself) points to Yoda being on par with Exar Kun and the Ancient Sith." (page 17)

Sama:
"I haven't seen anything firmly supporting Kun > Yoda" (page 14)

Shall I go on ?

because if you actually read this thread and not made a fool out of yourself acting like an immature little child everytime I accidentally diminish your favorite character, you'd see that I was arguing with lightsnake over a quote, and the quote was accurate. Nobody has told me I was outdebated, nobody, so making shit up to make yourself feel better doesn't really work here does it?

Where did you diminish my favourite character exactly ? Aside of the fact that Yoda isn't my favourite character where have you posted something that even came close to "diminish" him ? All I have from you is "Kun's amulet will be the deciding factor" and that's it. Even more funny that you continued this debate after agreeing with me that this won't be the case. Alzheimer much ?

On another note, which is it... Do I post 100 times a day or 90? Or maybe 75 the next time you write a testy little rebuttal full of your indignant ramblings?

Do I really care how often you do post here ? The single fact that you managed to push your posting counter over 1000 in the matter of 10 days says enough.

And please don't point out how you keep wasting your time, because you make the effort to write full novels about how I fail to use "Logic". Let me make it clear to you that I have shown that I can debate, and I debate based on what I know.

Excuse me: Wasting my time with you is clearly my decission, so no reason to cry because I was pointing out that a "discussion" with you is a waste of time. Let me make clear to you that your self-estimated ability to debate so far was limited to argue in circles against facts and when being caught in that act come up with some ridiculous comments.

"This is a frog"
"No. It is not"
"Of course it is !"
"No !"
"Here I have proof that this is a frog !"
"I've never said it's not a frog. Your inability to understand what I'm saying is hilarious."

If there is something I am NOT familiar with, that doesn't make me illogical, so don't come here spewing your "logical argument" crap because it has no bearing on what's going on.

Hilarious. So...let me clearly rephrase this: You're basically trying to tell me that you have no idea what you're talking about but that little fact doesn't keep you from arguing a topic that you - according to your own words - don't know anything about ? Then aside of this, despite the fact that you are "new" on this boards you already knew what was the common "view" of a certain versus fight (Vodo vs Yoda) around here - well enough to use this as a base for some "logical deduction" ?
And to trump it all: That you can't base "logical deduction" on an opinion should be quite obvious for somebody who is familiar with the concept of logic and despite of this you still did it. So...what do you want ? You made a mistake I've pointed that out and that's it.

And a total smackdown? I've had you rant on incoherently like a little child about how I'm a nerd, illogical, etc. If anything is funny, it is just that. I chuckle to myself how angry internet kids get.

Nope, my friend. You had me acting like a "vicious cynic" (as Lightsnake put it once). I'm awfully sorry for being completely right in my judgement about you - something you proof with every post. And by the way, dude: "I get 5-10 people a day telling me they chuckle to theirselves how angry internet kids get while going apeshit over the fact that said internet kids are kicking their ass on some unimportant SW versus forum". Does that sound familiar ? Ah well...a last thing: Wasn't that you who told me that calling other persons "kid" is retarted ? Welcome to the club, dude.

Wow.. Testy Nai.. Firstly, it is funny how you constantly attempt to insult me for pointing out your continuous inability to understand certain terms. So no "dude", I don't fit the description of a troll, or perhaps you would like for me to repost the definition so you can get a clear understanding of the word? Also, should I explain to you the context into which everyone said I got outdebated, since you love to take it out of context to prove your point? Did you happen to conveniently forget that it was purely and ONLY talking about my argument with lightsnake about a specific quote, which I later said that he was right, or are you going to continue to ATTEMPT to ridicule me? I'm glad you have to point out to yourself how I am getting ridiculed, and how I am supposedly getting my ass kicked daily on a SW forum. Considering the fact that other than you, Escape, and Sama, nobody on here seems to debate or know how, so your illogical assumption about how "I get my ass kicked every day" is invalid. And again, I argue from what I know, so if you prove me otherwise you don't see me crying over it, or personally attacking you like a middle school social outcast(which is exactly what you are doing). I had no knowledge of events like Yoda living an avalanche, Yoda taking the Darkside out of something, etc. So if you're going to tell me I lack the arguing abilities to events I know, maybe you should reread these arguments instead of busying yourself with futile attempts to "ridicule" me, "Dude".