Originally posted by Xepeyon
YOU'RE Not getting my POINT! Anakin had intercource, the Force didn't. Anakin shared his genes, the Force didn't. The Force created his life, But anakin mixed his genes. Why can't you understand that?
You can't really use that logic in Star Wars, it goes against Science in so many instances - if Lucas stated it, then it must be so.
No, YOU are... He said that Anakin would be the strongest, and that was during the PT, before Luke was born. Lucas has said IN INTERVIEWS that Luke became what Anakin WOULD have become if he got full potential. So no, you are arguing against Lucas.....
And you're arguing exactly like everyone did with Ragnos. They're argument was, "Ragnos was THE sith lord, which means he is above Sidious". But it was only in his time...
Originally posted by kamikz
No, YOU are... He said that Anakin would be the strongest, and that was during the PT, before Luke was born. Lucas has said IN INTERVIEWS that Luke became what Anakin WOULD have become if he got full potential. So no, you are arguing against Lucas.....And you're arguing exactly like everyone did with Ragnos. They're argument was, "Ragnos was THE sith lord, which means he is above Sidious". But it was only in his time...
anakin would have become the strongest until the end? do u get it? no so ill explain, he would have killed sidious, killed luke and became what luke had become in NJO and he would have crushed the rebels and the yuuzhan vong wouldnt dare to go against the empire.
Also its u whos argueing with GL. he said the strongest force user OF ALL TIME, yes luke became what he was suppose to become but anakin is THE CHOSEN ONE not luke and would have learned much more than luke.
NJO luke and FULL anakin are equal in power BUT because anakin is in the darkside and rage is his strength he would use his hatred AND anger to crush any 1 who opposes him, he would have Crushed Marka Ragnos
Originally posted by kamikz
Up til that time. Luke wasn't even born when GL said he would become the most powerful. So, allow me to say SURPRISE!!!!
and GL said that already when luke came out in the OT what the hell are you talking about. clearly GL said he would be because he would have killed Luke, killed sidious .
having the same potential doesnt mean the same powers nor the strength
and read the first page of this thread please, 2 good debators are giving good arguements,
Uh, Vader would have killed Luke AS A KID, that's what it meant. And it was in a more recent interview that he said Luke was equal to Anakin. If GL decides to change the whole OT, he can and then the old one is un-canon. GL has stated Luke is what Anakin would have become, GET OVER IT!!!
And if anyone would be superior it would be Luke. Luke has been taught things from DE Sidious, who had much more superior knowledge than PT/OT Sidious, and Luke has experienced ´the Yuuzhan Vong, which gave him alot of more pure saber skills, and able to reach WHOLE NEW LEVELS of the force, techniques Anakin would never have learned...
Of course. In the Strongest Jedi/Sith thread, I ranked DE Sidious above him. Of course I am going to edit that list again and make Ragnos second. Yes, kamikz, perhaps a Sith in the future might be more powerful (though I doubt it). But he is very strong and I wouldn't be surprised if he was the strongest Sith of all time.