Full potential anakin vs Marka ragnos

Started by Quinlan_Vos5 pages
He's asking for the actual quote, which I'd like to see, too.

Bump, I wish to see it as well.

Me too. Prove up Lightsnake. Prove up.

It's in a magazine, and I don't have a webcam. I think LS has it though, so if he wants to he can probably show it.

And I think just looking at Luke's progress describes that he is at least as strong as Vader.

Vader comments that he is probably as strong if not stronger than he once was.
Vader later says "someone so young SHOULD NOT BE so powerful".
Luke in 6 months got pretty close to Anakin with 13 years.
Luke got a whole different level of experience. He has faced Vong, which REQUIRED him to get a much better swordsmanship, and he even discovered new areas in the force, which were devistatingly powerful...

Not only did he grow faster, but he also evolved alot more than Anakin did. Anakin was said to become twice as powerful as Sidious (ROTS that is) if he did not lose his potential, and we have all agreed that NJO Luke would WTF pwn DE SIDIOUS! DE Sidious is easily around 150 or 200% as good as the normal, if not even more. If there would be no evidence that Luke and Anakin had the same potential, then it is safe to assume that Luke is stronger than Anakin. Anakin being the strongest is only said by GL during the PT, in which Luke was not yet born...

While we're at it, where is the quote from GL saying Anakin would become the most powerful again? (I have forgot where he said it, though I know it's around the PT time).

And if we think about it, Anakin lost half his arm to Dooku, while Luke only lost his hand. Shouldn't that give Luke more potential than Anakin? (Though we are arguing full potential)

The name of the topic and the subject of the topic ar eway off.

Marka has been so forgotten and replaced by "who's better? Luke or Anakin AT FULL POWER!!!?"

Infinity and ESB Vader bring it up NON STOP, it's pretty impossible to keep it back.

kamikz im listening to your opinions,

NJO luke became powerful as he went down the path of a jedi master.
anakin therefore we havnt seen yet, he is unknown but GL said they were somewhatequal as you told me kamikz, then it is possible that anakin could have done the things luke did.

i have no proof to this however.

but lets put it this way, i know kamikz you are getting a little bit annoyed.
since GL words said anakin = luke lets keep it that way, full anakin = njo luke

Lucas didn't state shit until I see that quote. Everyone throws it around, but where is the source? I've yet to see the actual quote, date & issue, or a scan.

Why do people keep claiming Luke = Anakin when we're just taking someone's word? Produce proof that Anakin's potential is equivalent to Luke's, or quite simply - it's not, and don't say it.

well still lucas said anakin would have been the most powerful force user who ever lived.

note the word "who ever lived" and that means SW from the beginning to the very end.

im kind of being ignorant, sigh people say this and i follow /slap me

so for marka vs anakin,

i would say anakin because at his peak he could have done things better than njo luke, maybe some power we havnt seen (my opinion)