Is God...?

Started by Red Two23 pages

This is the Firs Thread Were Lord Urizen doesent such stupid shit as Im Eating shit or Can you pee in my mouth

Originally posted by debbiejo
😂

True enough. 😆

Originally posted by Madman_V3N0M
God sees porn he does not watch it 😛

What's the difference ?

Originally posted by BackFire
No, he makes porn. Angel porn, mmm mmm mmm.

droolioOH YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

Originally posted by Red Two
This is the Firs Thread Were Lord Urizen doesent such stupid shit as Im Eating shit or Can you pee in my mouth

Hey ! Those were VALID THREADS ! PEE AND FECES ARE DELICIOUS ! droolio

No but seriously, enough with the exxagerations.

Why can't you just answer the question at stake here ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
What's the difference ?

If you watch you make the choice to look at and think about and comprehend it.

Like...you watch Goats ****ing, while I only see your idiotic posts (cause you choose to post them all over the Forum while you actually make the effort to find goats that ****, cause you are sick).

Originally posted by Eis
If only I had your come back skills.

U jealous ?

OH YEAH ! OH YEAH !

Originally posted by Eis
Why do you think pornography is "outlawed" in Christianity? Because it sexually arouses people and make them unclean, however that's besides the point.

Christianity condemns Pornography in general. Just because the Bible makes no mention of pornography, the same way it makes no mention of Gay Marriage, doesn't mean it's not against the topic here.

Much of Christianity is not based on the Bible, and this is one of those things.

Originally posted by Eis
A sin is an offense against the law set by God. Somehow I don't recall it being in the Bible that God has to follow his own laws or he'll go to hell.
And either way, the context in which one isn't supposed to be watching porn is completely different from God's all seeing eye. Shouldn't take too many of your scrambled brains to figure that out.

The context is irrelevant. Whether you watch porn for personal pleasure, because someone forces you to, because you are curious, because you are doing "research", or for whatever reason, it is still watching porn.

If God watches all, then he watches porn as well, and he is doing something that he tells us not to do.....hypocritical.

Originally posted by Eis
And I would hardly call "I drink Jesus' Sperm", "Jesus Is Inside Me" and "The Bible Is Boring" critique.
Also, check your dictionary, vendetta doesn't necessarily mean blood feud, you imbecile.

Those are jokes dude, you need to get that cactus out of your ass and lighten up.

A vendetta at its most basic is a grudge or malevolent stigma towards something.

i would hardly call my criticisms or times I poke fun at Christianity a vendetta either way.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Man, Urizen, it's so pathetic. You get pwned by 14 year olds day in, day out now, aren't you?

Bardock is calling me pathetic ?

Sh*t, you know you SUNK LOW when Bardock, the embodyment of pointlessness, critisizes you that way.

That's kind of like Hitler calling me a racist 😆

Originally posted by Bardock42
If you watch you make the choice to look at and think about and comprehend it.

Like...you watch Goats ****ing, while I only see your idiotic posts (cause you choose to post them all over the Forum while you actually make the effort to find goats that ****, cause you are sick).

Another pathetic attempt at an insult ❌

When are you going to realize Bardock that your criticism of me equals cat feces in my eyes. Your random insults only serve as my entertainment,

Thanks for the laugh 👆

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
[b]Bardock is calling me pathetic ?

Sh*t, you know you SUNK LOW when Bardock, the embodyment of pointlessness, critisizes you that way.

That's kind of like Hitler calling me a racist 😆 [/B]

Haha, you are stupid, childish, pointless and can't hold yourself in a debate against 14 year olds. STFU.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Haha, you are stupid, childish, pointless and can't hold yourself in a debate against 14 year olds. STFU.

Someone needs a blowjob ✅

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Another pathetic attempt at an insult ❌

When are you going to realize Bardock that your criticism of me equals cat feces in my eyes. Your random insults only serve as my entertainment,

Thanks for the laugh 👆

Urizen, I explained the difference between watching and seeing something to you, since you do not grasp it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Urizen, I explained the difference between watching and seeing something to you, since you do not grasp it.

Yes, and your explanation implies that God just accidently happens to stumble upon pornography.

If God doesn't intentionally see pornography, then he cannot help being "all seeing" and his ability of perceptions is beyond his control.

That presents a flaw, since God should be able to choose what he sees....

I assumed he can easily choose not to look....

do you see the dilemma ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Yes, and your explanation implies that God just accidently happens to stumble upon pornography.

If God doesn't intentionally see pornography, then he cannot help being "all seeing" and his ability of perceptions is beyond his control.

That presents a flaw, since God should be able to choose what he sees....

I assumed he can easily choose not to look....

do you see the dilemma ?

No. It is of no matter if God sees everything. He does not watch you. Whether he can help it or not is also not important. If you want to say there is a flaw with an all-powerful, all-good, all-seeing God then yes, that is true. But God does not watch porn (if he exists). That is a wrong usage of the term.

The context is irrelevant. Whether you watch porn for personal pleasure, because someone forces you to, because you are curious, because you are doing "research", or for whatever reason, it is still watching porn.

If God watches all, then he watches porn as well, and he is doing something that he tells us not to do.....hypocritical.


Somehow I doubt if someone's tied to a chair and forced to see pictures of naked women the pope will be yelling for that someone to burn.
Of course the context matters.

As for the rest of your post, grow up.

Originally posted by Eis
Of course the context matters.

So if you watch porn as a "documentary" then it's not a sin ? It's somehow better ? 🙄

Originally posted by Eis
As for the rest of your post, grow up.

I did. Another inch baby 😄

So if you watch porn as a "documentary" then it's not a sin ? It's somehow better ?

Your idiocy knows no borders. People would still be sexually aroused, whether it's in a documentary or a playboy magazine. The lust is the real sin.

Re: Does God Watch Porn ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Okay, Seriously..think about this for a second.

Moderators, before you consider moving this to the Off-Topic Thread, and fellow posters before you consider bashing this another "pointless" thread, please read the following:

Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike claim that Pornography in general is a sin. We already had a thread about that, so i won't go too much into it. It is clear that Pornography is not condoned by any mainstream, monotheistic religion.

Supposedly, God says it's a sin for us to watch "pornography" because it is "immoral" for whatever reason.

So If it is truly immoral, and [b]"ungodly" to watch Porn, does God watch it ?

Now, beleivers claim that God is ALL SEEING. If this is true, which both the BIBLE and Christian Faith supports.....then God surely MUST WATCH PORN.

Do you guys get that? If he is ALL SEEING, then he SEES PORNOGRAPHY as well, and therefore TECHNICALLY he WATCHES PORN TO !

There's no way around it....now, what's my point ?

Well.....If it is "immoral" , "sinful" or "UNGODLY" to watch Porn, then how come it's okay when GOD DOES IT ?

How come it's okay for GOD to do something UNGODLY ?

Honestly, does this not sound hypocritical to you guys ?
Why is it okay for GOD TO SIN, but it's bad when WE do it ?

Can anyone clear this contradiction for me please ? [/B]

What makes porn porn? Porn is porn because it titilates, it makes the watcher contemplate sexual relations in a manner that is prohibited. Can man produce material that elicits such a response in God? No, I believe such cannot occur. Thus, by my definition, God does not watch porn, due to its subjective nature.

Classic theism has always postulated a non-material, disembodied divinity. Any direct experiential knowledge of this sort would thus be problematic, at best, God can know what it’ s like for others to watch porn.

Quality of threads is so much more satisfying than quantity. But alas...

Originally posted by Eis
Your idiocy knows no borders. People would still be sexually aroused, whether it's in a documentary or a playboy magazine. The lust is the real sin.

Let's take this a little further. Recently, a woman was thrown in jail for a year for making false accusations of rape. She claimed that she had been abducted at gunpoint and raped by four men. Only, there was a videotape made of the sexual act, and it clearly showed the woman not only consenting to the sex, but actually directing the men.

Whoops.

Now, that video tape is pornagraphic. And yet, I don't thing there's anybody in the world who would imply that the police officers in charge of the case shouldn't have watched it. Why? Because, Urizan, you twit, the context in which they watched the tape was one wherein they had no prurient motivations; the context of the action did indeed make every difference in the world.