Creation vs Evolution

Started by AOR221 pages
Originally posted by Alliance
Then can I remind them that evolutoin does not say something came from nothing?

I don't understand this question. As a Catholic, along with many others, I believe that Evolution does not contradict the story of creation. If anything I think that evolution is a well proven theory than can scientifically (least to say factually) prove the origins of both plant and animals (humans alike). If that's what you're saying than good forget my comment...ermm

It might help if I spell checked...but what I'm saying is that the origin of the universe has no play on evolution.

Evolution and creation are prefectly compatible.

Evolution and creationism are not.

did anyone read the front page article in the new york times today (Feb. 12) about the guy who received his PhD in paleontology or something, but was a young earth creationist?

Originally posted by Alliance

Evolution and creation are prefectly compatible.

Evolution and creationism are not.

How is it not? How is it not compatible that a God created the laws of science from which evolution adhered to?

Originally posted by AOR
How is it not? How is it not compatible that a God created the laws of science from which evolution adhered to?

I think he means literalism.

http://www.livescience.com/mysteries/070215_humans_primates.html

Why Haven't All Primates Evolved into Humans?

February 15, 2007

Humans did not evolve from apes, gorillas or chimps. We are all modern species that have followed different evolutionary paths, though humans share a common ancestor with some primates, such as the African ape.

To say we are more "evolved" than our hairy cousins is just wrong. (See how long you last naked in the Congo Heartland, and then tell me who's got the evolutionary upper hand.)

Thinking that a species evolves in order to survive is to put the horse before the cart. Genetic mutations happen all the time, without fanfare and often without any measurable change in the organism's lifestyle. In general, the mutations most likely to be passed to future generations are those that prove useful to either individual or species survival.

The "usefulness" of a mutation depends largely on shifting environmental factors like those of food, predators, and climate, and also on social pressures. Evolution is a matter of filling ecological and social niches. African apes are still around because their environment has encouraged the reproductive success of individuals with different genetic material than ours.
Evolution is an ongoing process of trial and error, of which all modern primates are still a part.

I was not a monkey!

Originally posted by debbiejo
I was not a monkey!

Where did you come up with that?tohslaugh

European women are monkeys, they don't shave...... 😕

Originally posted by debbiejo
European women are monkeys, they don't shave...... 😕

😱

Originally posted by AOR
How is it not? How is it not compatible that a God created the laws of science from which evolution adhered to?

Reread what i wrote.

Evolution and creation are comapatible.

Evolution and creationism are not.

That would imply that creation is not equal to creationism and that they are different concepts. So, I already addressed your comments.

Originally posted by AOR
How is it not? How is it not compatible that a God created the laws of science from which evolution adhered to?
Creationism is not "God made the laws of Science which caused evolution." creationism is "evolution didn't happen, God did it."

Originally posted by lord xyz
Creationism is not "God made the laws of Science which caused evolution." creationism is "evolution didn't happen, God did it."
"God made the laws of Science which caused evolution" would be Intelligent Design. Creationism and Intelligent Design are totally different.

How can anyone possibly believe in evolution? The very idea of it is ridiculous. First off the big bang theory is laughable, everything: humans, nature, everything was created by an explosion...yeah...right. Look at how complicated a single human body is, how could an explosion could have created that? Seriously the idea is stupid. Sorry but it is.

Originally posted by Arctic
How can anyone possibly believe in evolution? The very idea of it is ridiculous. First off the big bang theory is laughable, everything: humans, nature, everything was created by an explosion...yeah...right. Look at how complicated a single human body is, how could an explosion could have created that? Seriously the idea is stupid. Sorry but it is.

What a fantastic display of ignorance.

What a fantastic display of trying to sound smarter than you really are. Get a grip.

Originally posted by Arctic
Thats what you think. nopity

I don't follow what you're saying.

Originally posted by Arctic
What a fantastic display of trying to sound smarter than you really are. Get a grip.

Do you want me to break it down for you?

Whats with the apostrophe in the word "want?"...no thanks I dont want anything broken down by someone so stupid.

Originally posted by Arctic
I dont want anything broken down by someone so stupid.

Since you clearly don't know what your talking about will explain it to you.

1) No explosion in the BigBang
2) The BigBang did not create anything even remotely complex
3) The BigBang is in no way related to evolution