Originally posted by CreshoskThis is really no different than saying, "strawman" or "ad hominem" and leaving it there.
lol .. no. Doesn't work like that.
Originally posted by CreshoskIt wasn't a dismissal just the fact that they pop up when you have nothing else to argue, you spend more time arguing semantics than the actual debate, as proven.
That's rich. Seeing as how you try to dismiss what I say as "odd words".
And it's really no different than "strawman, fallacy" or "doesn't work like that".
How about "pot to the kettle".
All just accusations and not a solid argument. If I ask you to answer a question you'll only use jargon.
Originally posted by CreshoskWhy is that? I can't wait for more of your contradiction.
Uhh.. . I never vote.
Originally posted by CreshoskBecause you said it, that makes it true.
less valid than 0 validity?
Originally posted by Creshosk
And the fact that this is what you're talking about?
Originally posted by CreshoskI mean even continuing to pick on irrelevant points shows you out.
I mean hell even dismissing my arguments as "odd words" showed you were out.
Originally posted by Creshosk
I didn't say to shut up.
Originally posted by Creshosk
You're imagining thing, but your ad hominem continues...
Originally posted by CreshoskLike the thread you pulled up, I was just waiting for you to see that.
ad populem. 😉
Originally posted by Creshosk
The Earth is flat isn't it?
Wolverine is hated on a thread isn't he? Oh wait, since it suits your argument it works right?
Originally posted by Creshosk
I don't claim to leave and then . . don't.
Originally posted by Creshosk"Exagregating".... right, are you sure you don't have a comprehension problem? 😆
Exagrerating...
Originally posted by Creshosk
So? I never claimed to leave. You did...
Originally posted by Creshosk
Is it possible for you to not appeal to the populous? you keep going, this pperson or that person or the whole forum...None of which is bvalid.. Ad populem you know?
You mean like that thread... oh wait that suited you, so it counts just fine, I would say your hypocrisy is ironic, but I've rather come to expect it.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Now you're outright lying.
Originally posted by CreshoskSame thing can be said about your accusation of being a hater. Really you're just proving my point to me whenever you run to defend the balls of Wolverine in any given thread.
Yeah, I'm a fanboy. 🙄 because I don't agree with you that makes me a fanboy... uh huh...😆 Riiight...
Originally posted by CreshoskBecause it really isn't an argument.
And there's a lovely little strawman. Hello straman. How are you?Of Course C-Master will just dismiss this (🙄) like he did before.
I could just say wrong, but you would ask why. That would make it my job to answer, of course you never follow through on your accusations as proved last week, you simply go and interpret what you want in people's posts.
Originally posted by CreshoskBack when popularity never played a big factor.
No you couldn't. 😆 You can post a scan of Thing knocking Wolverine out once out of the multiple times they've encountered each other.
Originally posted by CreshoskLike you cropped that thread had the same people voting.
You'll probably even crop out Mr. fantastic pointing out that Wolverine was already messed up.
Originally posted by CreshoskWhy would I force a fanboy to swallow anything, they're too busy swallowing the manjuice of Wolverine.
But oh those are excuses as to why we don't swallow your hater crap. 🙄
Originally posted by bigbranNope, he justifies them.
Actually, you think those feats, of wolverine getting taken down, were pis, don't you?
Originally posted by bigbranOnly if you meet the same circumstances... which are removed for these fights.
But because you haven't called pis....
Ok, then if those feats aren't pis, then Wolverine did get taken down, by a bat to the nuts, And he did get taken down by Daredevil.
One low showing is going to ruin hundreds of high showings.
Originally posted by bigbranOne question I have for you is... what plot point did it further along? what did this acheive?
Wolverine stabbing Thanos is pis. Thanos, not putting up a sheild is pis.
Thanos not batting him a way, before Wolverine got to him is pis.
The whole idea behind it is pis.
Originally posted by CreshoskI am backing up my character. That's all I'm doing.
Nope, he justifies them.Only if you meet the same circumstances... which are removed for these fights.
One question I have for you is... what plot point did it further along? what did this acheive?
Originally posted by Psyquis52Huh?
This thread has officially become scary.I don't think anyone in their right mind would say one way or the other at this point.
Originally posted by Psyquis52But this time, I'm on a character I like and know a lot about!
How should I explain it? To anybody who doesn't want to engage in a debate as long as the state of California, this thread is intimidating.
Oh ya Thing probably loses, 6/10.
Originally posted by CreshoskSo you just edited, that huge post?!?!?!?
What does any of that have to do with Wolverine or thing C? Nothing. I'm not falling for your red herring trolling anymore.
Originally posted by CreshoskEvery thread goes off topic.
What does thanos who has a higher durabiltiy than thing have anything to do here?
Originally posted by bigbranYup, it was just me defending myself against one of his ad hominem attacks . . . again.
So you just edited, that huge post?!?!?!?
Having nothing to do with the topic it just would have continued. I decided to put my foot down and not let his hypocrisy get to me.
Originally posted by bigbranOff topic with friendly banter is better than off topic arguing. I am already pretty steamed at his insensitive remarks.
Every thread goes off topic.
But this arguement has been settled. So unless someone else comes in here and says Thing wins, then what is the point of the thread?
Anyways, Wolverine wins. 6/10