The thing is, they have no talent outside of Rando, Garnett, Pierce and Allen. They gave all thier young guys away.
Allen and Garnett are 32,31 while Pierce is 29. In a couple of years, they'll be 2-3 years older and well, they could possible have a chance that they wont be as good as they are now. Because they gave away any talent that they had, they'll be screwed if they dont win.
Originally posted by Smasandian
The thing is, they have no talent outside of Rando, Garnett, Pierce and Allen. They gave all thier young guys away.Allen and Garnett are 32,31 while Pierce is 29. In a couple of years, they'll be 2-3 years older and well, they could possible have a chance that they wont be as good as they are now. Because they gave away any talent that they had, they'll be screwed if they dont win.
I would take that risk if was a GM though.
Originally posted by vandalworks
garnett to the celts. didnt see that coming i must be honest.they've been trying teh get a young team thing for a while though, so it makes sense to bring some veteran superstars in. mite do them well.
If I'm not mistaken, they dont have young guys anymore. They traded them all away, and I think they're draft picks.