Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Lets drop this, ok?
I knew it. I did absolutely nothing wrong.
My heart was in the right place the whole time that I read the article and then posted it. I was not thinking attack, wishing attack, or intending attack. But then out of nowhere I get slammed with an unjust accusation. With sincere inquiry I asked you Shak. where, how, when did I attack anyone let alone Jehovah's Witnesses and you couldn't explain your charge to me. I wanted to know why I was accused of such a serious charge. Shak. this is the real me. My words and intention get miscontrued all of the time (mostly by you). If I say anything contrary to what you believe Shak. then it must obviously be an attack. It is not a difference of opinion it is an outright attack. Just yesterday it seemed that the conversation was light, congenial, and fun. I was calling you mother hen and all that. But today is like a bad dream. If I attacked JWs then simply substantiate it, but if not then just be more careful about accusing someone. I told you a couple of days ago in another post that you were impetuous and that it seems that you don't think first before you speak. Can't you see what I mean in light of all of this? I was not criticizing you I was making an observation and yet it appears to be true of you.
JIA, I don't know if you noticed, but I substantiated it for him.
If you want to continue this conversation with shak, please do it by PM. it is clear to people on this forum that you posted an article that attacked JWs, so kindly don't further drag all this off-topic by continually denying that.
Thankyou.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I knew it. I did absolutely nothing wrong.My heart was in the right place the whole time that I read the article and then posted it. I was not thinking attack, wishing attack, or intending attack. But then out of nowhere I get slammed with an unjust accusation. With sincere inquiry I asked you Shak. where, how, when did I attack anyone let alone Jehovah's Witnesses and you couldn't explain your charge to me. I wanted to know why I was accused of such a serious charge. Shak. this is the real me. My words and intention get miscontrued all of the time (mostly by you). If say anything contrary to what you believe Shak. then it must obviously be an attack. It is not a difference of opinion it is an outright attack. Just yesterday it seemed that the conversation was light, congenial, and fun. I was calling you mother hen and all that. But today is like a bad dream. If I attacked JWs then simply substantiate it, but if not then just be more careful about accusing someone. I told you a couple of days ago in another post that you were impetuous and that it seems that you don't think first before you speak. Can't you see what I mean in light of all of this? I was not criticizing you I was making an observation and yet it appears to be true of you.
So, you want to keep going, after a MOD stepped in? Please if you must continue, do so with pm's.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
JIA, I don't know if you noticed, but I substantiated it for him.If you want to continue this conversation with shak, please do it by PM. it is clear to people on this forum that you posted an article that attacked JWs, so kindly don't further drag all this off-topic by continually denying that.
Thankyou.
I did not attack anyone let alone JWs. That person has the right to express their personal testimony as a Jehovah Witness. Don't accuse me of attacking JWs because I didn't.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
That;s a lie, JIA. You posted an article saying that they perpetuate a lie. That is an attack. Sorry, but it is, and your denials will not change that.Please return to topic.
I posted an article written by a former Jehovah Witness who said that. Don't confuse us two. If I had said that then you would have a case but I didn't say that.
Firm absis of law: Repeating an allegation is equivalent to making the accusation yourself.
As yu plasted in very big letters across the top of the post about a lie being exposed- a headline which you would have had to have deliberately enlarged for empahsis- your claim that you were merely impartially posting the article does not stand up to scrutiny.
That article was an attack. You posted it. Therefore you posted an attack. You did not post a different article in support in order to balance the view. You simply test everyone's patience in trying to wriggle out of what you did.
This is no longer a discussion. Return to topic, and if you want to keep arguing with Shak, do it my PM.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Firm absis of law: Repeating an allegation is equivalent to making the accusation yourself.As yu plasted in very big letters across the top of the post about a lie being exposed- a headline which you would have had to have deliberately enlarged for empahsis- your claim that you were merely impartially posting the article does not stand up to scrutiny.
That article was an attack. You posted it. Therefore you posted an attack. You did not post a different article in support in order to balance the view. You simply test everyone's patience in trying to wriggle out of what you did.
This is no longer a discussion. Return to topic, and if you want to keep arguing with Shak, do it my PM.
I wriggle out of nothing and no one especially you Usgarak. I will not now nor ever accept your characterization of my intentions.
Originally posted by Alliance😱 Alliance, that may explain the curt manner he by which he sometimes comes across...he has to share living quarters with you 😛 J/K 😉
Ha. Its also my roomates birthday...maybe he and Ush are the same person!
I can't imagine having to listen to you philosophize all day and all of the night, and then have to read it on the Internet as well 😉
Originally posted by Regret
😱 Alliance, that may explain the curt manner he by which he sometimes comes across...he has to share living quarters with you 😛 J/K 😉I can't imagine having to listen to you philosophize all day and all of the night, and then have to read it on the Internet as well 😉
If Ush and I lived together, we'd be at eachothers throats. I'd think he'd agree. We have had two major battles, neither resolved.
Originally posted by Alliance
If Ush and I lived together, we'd be at eachothers throats. I'd think he'd agree. We have had two major battles, neither resolved.
I can see it now Deathmatch: Alliance vs. Ushgarak battle of the KMC members that frequent the Religion Forum!!!! Next week stay tuned for Deathmatch: Peejayd vs. JesusIsAlive battle of the Bible quoter's extraordinare!!! The next week stay tuned for Deathmatch: Debbiejo vs. Debbiejo?