Originally posted by ThePittman
Way to gloss over the post, it is man that determines that a book is to be part of the canon so it is man with his flaws is to say what the word of God is, you don’t see a problem with this? The other issue is that these are “inspired” writings of God, so man again with his flaws wrote the words of God, you don’t see a problem with this?You say that I have to interrupt the meaning of the scriptures, this lead only too many different variations of it so who version is correct and why not take it as it is written?
So why did they need this rule? Why did women have these questions? We they dumb and couldn’t control themselves and me could?
I didn't gloss over anything, I answered each one of your statements one-by-one.
No, I don't see a problem with that.
I never said anything about you interrupting anything.