srankmissingnin
VP of Comic Knowledge
Ever heard of a hyperbole? Head down to chapters and pick up a dictionary of literary terms 'champ. If Riceroost actually though Wolverine could dodge five Spider-man all day, I'm pretty sure he would have given him better odds against one. He was exaggerating to make his point more effective, nothing more.
And Wolverine has shown an amazing vertical leap (although I hesitate to say in the order of 50 feet). Riceroost wasn't condoning the fact just stating that it has happened, more then once, and he is right.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Funny man, trying to beat me with inferior rhetoric. Let me help you child.
I understand you wanted the throw the word rhetoric into your post somewhere but couldn't you have fought a better quote to use? Me calling you bias and delusional was a simple statement, blunt and to the point with no attempt to persuaded you into believing it.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
If I was truly delusional (which is actually you since I’ve thrown overwhelming facts in the contrary to you and your homoerotic supporters), I would be mentally ill and perceiving everything as fact and perfectly normal. As opposed to…
You read the Wolverine threads you posted and the Spider-man threads I posted and came to the conclusion that Wolverine supporters were seriously arguing in favour of Wolverine over the likes of Superman, while the Spider-man fans were all joke threads. How is that not delusion? 99% of the people posting in those threads are schmucks who post Wolverine wins as a joke... and then someone like you brings it up latter in an attempt to incriminate (which is odd since a lot of those stupid posts are your handy work). There is also the fact that you have said, several times, that Spider-man is a more consistent character then Wolverine that hasn't had changed since his creation... but I guess Spider-man is a class two character with a vague ringing noise in his head to alert him of danger huh?
And what are this facts you've thrown at me? There aren't any and the idea that you think there is cements the fact that your delusional. Just because you call something a fact doesn't make it one CM. You pawn off your twisted opinion as "facts" nothing more then that... and worst of all you seem to think it is effective.
You "facts" are like your "logic", flawed, full of holes and they only make sense to you.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Baised is me tending to go one way or another based on my preference, we are all biased to a degree, but I have no problem admitting Spiderman loses, in fact I do it more than I’d say he wins. So much for that, mentally ill friend, or mentally challenged at least. Now, for more of your lesson…
Of course every one has their own set of bias believes. Anyone can tell you that I favor Wolverine over Spiderman, massively so, but I still think Spiderman beats Wolverine the high majority. And yet I still have to sit here read the rantings of Spider-man fanboys who have the nerve to question my credibility because I don't think ol' Petey is Quicksilver. But how about examples of you putting your biases aside? What was it you said the last time this was brought up? "I don't think Spider-man can beat Thor". Was that it? Well gee, I'm so glad you were able to bypass your bias and over come adversity to come to that startling conclusion! You are a real hero CM.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Try again, I just quoted my title and didn’t bother fixing it. Because I don’t need to. As long as guys like you are around I’ll always have tons of funny quotes and spite threads directed at me since you guys can’t actually win an argument in the first place
What title... you gave an account of your current activities. Which apparently involved "swatting haters". Now shall we look at the some facts?
1. You posted from a computer, most likely a home computer
2. You are a Wolverine hater
3. You were likely alone while posting
It stands to reason that you were swatting your self... but what ever you are into I guess.
And I get the joke so lets not waste anymore time on your "title" in future posts. Besides I don't care what you call your self while you are pumping my gas, just remember my car takes premium and lets avoid the small talk. 😎
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Oh really, and what feats are those pray tell? I thought you said earlier that I went off of nothing but handbook evidence before, and now you switch and say I use only high end feats. Please tell me where I sit and post high end feats, that is not in an attempt to debunk others using high end feats to show them how utterly pointless that feat wars are.
I never said you posted Spider-man feats I said you uses his high end feats as the foundation of your argument. Your opinion of what Spider-man is capable of is in line with all of Spider-man high end shows. I don't need you tell me this, anyone with basic reasoning skill can figure it out. There has to be some reason to your madness. I had assumed you read a significant number of Spider-man issues and decided what level you think Spider-man operates on. Or did I give you too much credit? Maybe you did just read the 03' Spider-man Handbook, his article of Wiki and decided you knew enough about the character to debate with others.
But don't worry CM I didn't forget that a large portion of your argument relies heavily on titles, random stats and the ability to disregard the abilities of other characters. Hey, its what you do after all.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
You, my hypocritical friend, use NOTHING but high end feats, all of the time, that suit your argument. You will never argue Wolverine getting hurt by anything under Hulk level, you will argue him in his few exceptions lifting ridiculous things as opposed to the contrary, and you’ll argue him, along with other fanboys who use nothing but high end feats, breaking the sound barrier, and jumping several stories in the air. I have no time for such idiocy, which is why I avoid feat wars in general. But I dare you to come up with a consistent list of Spiderman’s high end feats, and if I did use them, why in the **** would I not be backing them up if everyone knows they happened. Sounds like a copout to others because they have no other way around the argument regardless. You do not debate logically, nor do you take PIS into account with anything when it comes to Wolverine, there is no disputing Wolverine feats with you. Not once have you ever said wolverine has a crap feat, but you seem to have no problem bitching about Spiderman and Deathstroke. Typical fanboy irony.
Are you unable to understand the difference in power between Spider-man and the Hulk? There is a lot of space between Spider-man on a power scale and Hulk. How does thinking Spider-man can't ko Wolverine with brute force equate to everyone below the Hulk? That is ridiculous. A glancing blow from the Hulk would do more damage in an instant then Spider-man could build up over twelve hours. The force of Hulk waving his arms widely alone would be more damaging then an extent barrage from an angry Spider-man.
Wolverine shrugging off hits from the bricks is the norm, its who he is, it is the middle ground between his high-end and low-end feats. Do you want me to use Wolverine's high-end feats? Then we are dealing with a guy who single handedly beat, in a few panels, an ancient demon who owned the entire x-men, with his bare hands (and with out getting hit) beat the tar out of the leader of the Neo who shrugged of Colossus' best attacks and soloed the x-men, has gotten into and one bar room slug feasts with Asguardian Trolls, She-Hulk has has trouble restraining, oneshotted Rogue through several walls in the Pentagon, took a blast from Firelord with out being singed, regenerated from a skeleton in a few panels, survived a nuke point black and walked around burning at a temperature so hot that he was melting steel in seconds after a nuclear reactor vented over top of him. I don't use examples of PIS in any facet in my argument.
Wolverine strength feats are limited in number. Why? Because strength isn't a major part of his character but when have they ever been contradicted? Can you show me even one example of Wolverine saying "I'm not strong enough to lift this"? The fact of the matter is that the only time Wolverine ever struggled with a weight he was holding an elevator with one arm. Well Wolverine's strength feats are limited they are all constant and place in a similar strength category; the lowest of which (when he was carrying an Moose slung over one shoulder like it was nothing) places him well above the 800lbs limit set for him in the Hand Books.
But maybe I should say this in a way you can understand. Logically if Wolverine can shrug off even the most liberal of attacks form the Hulk, Spider-man wouldn't be able to put him down with brute strength. See how that works? Logically if Wolverine can hit Night Crawler/Beast/Venom/Puma(/Speed Demon!) then he would have no problem hitting Spider-man. I did it again! We really need either of those though since both have already been shown to be true. Your logic forces people to disregard facts (keep in mind we are talking real facts not your fabricated ones) and subscribe to a notion that has no backing and is contradictory by it's very nature.